| Literature DB >> 33568638 |
Fabien Aubry1, Sofie Jacobs2, Maïlis Darmuzey3, Sebastian Lequime4,5, Leen Delang2, Albin Fontaine6,7,8, Natapong Jupatanakul1,9, Elliott F Miot1, Stéphanie Dabo1, Caroline Manet10, Xavier Montagutelli10, Artem Baidaliuk1,11, Fabiana Gámbaro11, Etienne Simon-Lorière11, Maxime Gilsoul3, Claudia M Romero-Vivas12, Van-Mai Cao-Lormeau13, Richard G Jarman14, Cheikh T Diagne15, Oumar Faye15, Ousmane Faye15, Amadou A Sall15, Johan Neyts2, Laurent Nguyen3, Suzanne J F Kaptein16, Louis Lambrechts17.
Abstract
The global emergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) revealed the unprecedented ability for a mosquito-borne virus to cause congenital birth defects. A puzzling aspect of ZIKV emergence is that all human outbreaks and birth defects to date have been exclusively associated with the Asian ZIKV lineage, despite a growing body of laboratory evidence pointing towards higher transmissibility and pathogenicity of the African ZIKV lineage. Whether this apparent paradox reflects the use of relatively old African ZIKV strains in most laboratory studies is unclear. Here, we experimentally compare seven low-passage ZIKV strains representing the recently circulating viral genetic diversity. We find that recent African ZIKV strains display higher transmissibility in mosquitoes and higher lethality in both adult and fetal mice than their Asian counterparts. We emphasize the high epidemic potential of African ZIKV strains and suggest that they could more easily go unnoticed by public health surveillance systems than Asian strains due to their propensity to cause fetal loss rather than birth defects.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33568638 PMCID: PMC7876148 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21199-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919