Jesús Fernández1, Beatriz Villanueva2, Miguel Angel Toro3. 1. Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain. jmj@inia.es. 2. Departamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain. 3. Departamento de Producción Agraria, ETSI Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, UPM, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In commercial fish, dominance effects could be exploited by predicting production abilities of the offspring that would be generated by different mating pairs and choosing those pairs that maximise the average offspring phenotype. Consequently, matings would be performed to reduce inbreeding depression. This can be achieved by applying mate selection (MS) that combines selection and mating decisions in a single step. An alternative strategy to MS would be to apply minimum coancestry mating (MCM) after selection based on estimated breeding values. The objective of this study was to evaluate, by computer simulations, the potential benefits that can be obtained by implementing MS or MCM based on genomic data for exploiting dominance effects when creating commercial fish populations that are derived from a breeding nucleus. METHODS: The selected trait was determined by a variable number of loci with additive and dominance effects. The population consisted of 50 full-sib families with 30 offspring each. Males and females with the highest estimated genomic breeding values were selected in the nucleus and paired using the MCM strategy. Both MCM and MS were used to create the commercial population. RESULTS: For a moderate number of SNPs, equal or even higher mean phenotypic values are obtained by selecting on genomic breeding values and then applying MCM than by using MS when the trait exhibited substantial inbreeding depression. This could be because MCM leads to high levels of heterozygosity across the whole genome, even for loci affecting the trait that are in linkage equilibrium with the SNPs. In contrast, MS specifically promotes heterozygosity for SNPs for which a dominance effect has been detected. CONCLUSIONS: In most scenarios, for the management of aquaculture breeding programs it seems advisable to follow the MCM strategy when creating the commercial population, especially for traits with large inbreeding depression. Moreover, MCM has the appealing property of reducing inbreeding levels, with a corresponding reduction in inbreeding depression for traits beyond those included in the selection objective.
BACKGROUND: In commercial fish, dominance effects could be exploited by predicting production abilities of the offspring that would be generated by different mating pairs and choosing those pairs that maximise the average offspring phenotype. Consequently, matings would be performed to reduce inbreeding depression. This can be achieved by applying mate selection (MS) that combines selection and mating decisions in a single step. An alternative strategy to MS would be to apply minimum coancestry mating (MCM) after selection based on estimated breeding values. The objective of this study was to evaluate, by computer simulations, the potential benefits that can be obtained by implementing MS or MCM based on genomic data for exploiting dominance effects when creating commercial fish populations that are derived from a breeding nucleus. METHODS: The selected trait was determined by a variable number of loci with additive and dominance effects. The population consisted of 50 full-sib families with 30 offspring each. Males and females with the highest estimated genomic breeding values were selected in the nucleus and paired using the MCM strategy. Both MCM and MS were used to create the commercial population. RESULTS: For a moderate number of SNPs, equal or even higher mean phenotypic values are obtained by selecting on genomic breeding values and then applying MCM than by using MS when the trait exhibited substantial inbreeding depression. This could be because MCM leads to high levels of heterozygosity across the whole genome, even for loci affecting the trait that are in linkage equilibrium with the SNPs. In contrast, MS specifically promotes heterozygosity for SNPs for which a dominance effect has been detected. CONCLUSIONS: In most scenarios, for the management of aquaculture breeding programs it seems advisable to follow the MCM strategy when creating the commercial population, especially for traits with large inbreeding depression. Moreover, MCM has the appealing property of reducing inbreeding levels, with a corresponding reduction in inbreeding depression for traits beyond those included in the selection objective.
Authors: Daniel Gianola; Gustavo de los Campos; William G Hill; Eduardo Manfredi; Rohan Fernando Journal: Genetics Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: María Saura; María J Carabaño; Almudena Fernández; Santiago Cabaleiro; Andrea B Doeschl-Wilson; Osvaldo Anacleto; Francesco Maroso; Adrián Millán; Miguel Hermida; Carlos Fernández; Paulino Martínez; Beatriz Villanueva Journal: Front Genet Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Johann Ertl; Andrés Legarra; Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Christian Edel; Reiner Emmerling; Kay-Uwe Götz Journal: Genet Sel Evol Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 4.297
Authors: Hassan Aliloo; Jennie E Pryce; Oscar González-Recio; Benjamin G Cocks; Ben J Hayes Journal: Genet Sel Evol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 4.297