Literature DB >> 33567516

Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Rectal Cancer Staging: A Modern Multimodality Approach.

Alfonso Reginelli1, Alfredo Clemente1, Angelo Sangiovanni1, Valerio Nardone2, Francesco Selvaggi3, Guido Sciaudone3, Fortunato Ciardiello4, Erika Martinelli4, Roberto Grassi1, Salvatore Cappabianca1.   

Abstract

Preoperative staging represents a crucial point for the management, type of surgery, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy in patient with rectal cancer. The most recent clinical guidelines in oncology recommend an accurate preoperative evaluation in order to address early and advanced tumors to different therapeutic options. In particular, potential pitfalls may occur in the assessment of T3 tumors, which represents the most common stage at diagnosis. The depth of tumor invasion is known to be an important prognostic factor in rectal carcinoma; as a consequence, the T3 imaging classification has a substantial importance for treatment strategy and patient survival. However, the differentiation between tumor invasion of perirectal fat and mesorectal desmoplastic reactions remains a main goal for radiologists. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is actually considered as the best imaging modality for rectal cancer staging. Although the endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is the preferred staging method for early tumors, it could also be useful in identifying perirectal fat invasion. Moreover, the addiction of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) improves the diagnostic performance of MRI in rectal cancer staging by adding functional information about rectal tumor and adjacent mesorectal tissues. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of conventional MRI alone, in combination with the DWI technique and ERUS in order to assess the best diagnostic imaging combination for rectal cancer staging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endorectal ultrasonography; imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; rectal cancer; staging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33567516      PMCID: PMC7915333          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  46 in total

Review 1.  Imaging findings of unusual anorectal and perirectal pathology: a multi-modality approach.

Authors:  H C Rouse; M C B Godoy; W-K Lee; P T Phang; C J Brown; J A Brown
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 2.  MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; Camila Carlos Tavares Rocha; Brunna Clemente Oliveira; Iva Petkovska; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and recurrence after curative rectal cancer surgery in patients who are histologically node negative after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  D L H Baird; Q Denost; C Simillis; G Pellino; S Rasheed; C Kontovounisios; P P Tekkis; E Rullier
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Discrepancies between NCCN and ESMO guidelines in the management of anal cancer: a qualitative review.

Authors:  Natalie Johnson; Gianluca Pellino; Constantinos Simillis; Shengyang Qiu; Stella Nikolaou; Daniel L Baird; Shahnawaz Rasheed; Paris P Tekkis; Christos Kontovounisios
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-06-08

5.  The efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Shinya; Takamitsu Sasaki; Yoshifumi Nakagawa; Zhang Guiquing; Fumio Yamamoto; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

6.  Preoperative staging of patients with rectal tumors suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): comparison of endorectal ultrasound and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  Luigi Zorcolo; Giovanni Fantola; Francesco Cabras; Luigi Marongiu; Giuseppe D'Alia; Giuseppe Casula
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Perspective on the role of transrectal and transvaginal sonography of tumors of the rectum and anal canal.

Authors:  Francesca Berton; Giada Gola; Stephanie R Wilson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects.

Authors:  U Hildebrandt; G Feifel; H P Schwarz; O Scherr
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI.

Authors:  Christian Klessen; Patrik Rogalla; Matthias Taupitz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Overstaging: A Challenge in Rectal Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Jan Scheele; Stefan Andreas Schmidt; Sandra Tenzer; Doris Henne-Bruns; Marko Kornmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-07-31
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Towards personalized treatment of T2N0 rectal cancer: A systematic review of long-term oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy followed by local excision.

Authors:  Roberto Peltrini; Nicola Imperatore; Maria Michela Di Nuzzo; Gianluca Pellino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.369

2.  Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Is a Predictor for Complete Pathological Response in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Nir Horesh; Michael R Freund; Zoe Garoufalia; Rachel Gefen; Arun Nagarajan; Eva Suarez; Sameh Hany Emile; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Endorectal Ultrasonography and Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Show Similar Diagnostic Accuracy in Local Staging of Rectal Cancer: An Update Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Gianluca Pagano; Francesca Paola Tropeano; Eduardo Spina; Rosa Maione; Alessia Chini; Francesco Maione; Giuseppe Galloro; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.