Eva L K Voogt1, Jan M van Rees2, Jan A W Hagemans2, Joost Rothbarth2, Grad A P Nieuwenhuijzen3, Jeltsje S Cnossen4, Heike M U Peulen4, Wim J F Dries4, Joost Nuyttens5, Inger-Karine Kolkman-Deurloo5, Cornelis Verhoef2, Harm J T Rutten6, Jacobus W A Burger7. 1. Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Electronic address: eva.voogt@catharinaziekenhuis.nl. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), delivered by intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) or high-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy (HDR-IORT), may reduce the local recurrence rate in patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LARC and LRRC, respectively). The aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcomes between both IORT modalities in patients with LARC or LRRC who underwent a microscopic irradical (R1) resection. METHODS: All consecutive patients who received IORT because of an R1 resection of LARC or LRRC between 2000 and 2016 in two tertiary referral centers were included. In LARC, a resection margin of ≤2 mm was considered R1. A resection margin of 0 mm was considered R1 in LRRC. RESULTS: In total, 215 patients with LARC were included, of whom 151 (70%) received IOERT and 64 (30%) received HDR-IORT; in addition, 158 patients with LRRC were included, of whom 112 (71%) received IOERT and 46 (29%) received HDR-IORT. After multivariable analyses, the overall survival was not significantly different between the two IORT modalities. The local recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in patients treated with HDR-IORT, both in LARC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.496; 95% CI, 0.253-0.973; P = .041) and LRRC (HR, 0.567; 95% CI, 0.349-0.920; P = .021). In patients with LARC, major postoperative complications were similar for both IORT modalities (IOERT, 30%; HDR-IORT, 27%), whereas in patients with LRRC, the incidence of major postoperative complications was higher after HDR-IORT (IOERT, 26%; HDR-IORT, 46%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significantly better local recurrence-free survival in favor of HDR-IORT in patients with an R1 resection for LARC or LRRC. Optimization of the IOERT technique seems warranted.
PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), delivered by intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) or high-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy (HDR-IORT), may reduce the local recurrence rate in patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LARC and LRRC, respectively). The aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcomes between both IORT modalities in patients with LARC or LRRC who underwent a microscopic irradical (R1) resection. METHODS: All consecutive patients who received IORT because of an R1 resection of LARC or LRRC between 2000 and 2016 in two tertiary referral centers were included. In LARC, a resection margin of ≤2 mm was considered R1. A resection margin of 0 mm was considered R1 in LRRC. RESULTS: In total, 215 patients with LARC were included, of whom 151 (70%) received IOERT and 64 (30%) received HDR-IORT; in addition, 158 patients with LRRC were included, of whom 112 (71%) received IOERT and 46 (29%) received HDR-IORT. After multivariable analyses, the overall survival was not significantly different between the two IORT modalities. The local recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in patients treated with HDR-IORT, both in LARC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.496; 95% CI, 0.253-0.973; P = .041) and LRRC (HR, 0.567; 95% CI, 0.349-0.920; P = .021). In patients with LARC, major postoperative complications were similar for both IORT modalities (IOERT, 30%; HDR-IORT, 27%), whereas in patients with LRRC, the incidence of major postoperative complications was higher after HDR-IORT (IOERT, 26%; HDR-IORT, 46%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significantly better local recurrence-free survival in favor of HDR-IORT in patients with an R1 resection for LARC or LRRC. Optimization of the IOERT technique seems warranted.
Authors: An-Sofie E Verrijssen; Wim J F Dries; Jeltsje S Cnossen; Jacqueline Theuws; Heike M U Peulen; Hetty A van den Berg; Dorien C Rijkaart; Eva L K Voogt; Inger-Karine Kolkman-Deurloo; Joost Nuyttens; Harm J T Rutten; Jacobus W A Burger; Cathryn Huibregtse Bimmel-Nagel Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy Date: 2022-07-21