Literature DB >> 33566250

Understanding quality and equity: patient experiences with care in older adults diagnosed with hematologic malignancies.

Alex Fauer1,2, Sung Won Choi3,4, Lauren P Wallner3,5,4, Matthew A Davis6,3, Christopher R Friese6,5,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncology settings increasingly use patient experience data to evaluate clinical performance. Given that older patients with hematologic malignancies are a high-risk population, this study examined factors associated with patient-reported health care experiences during the first year of their cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study using the 2000-2015 SEER-CAHPS® data to examine patient experiences of Medicare enrollees with a primary diagnosis of leukemia or lymphoma. The primary outcomes were three CAHPS assessments: overall care, personal doctor, and health plan overall. We estimated case-mix adjusted and fully adjusted associations between factors (i.e., clinical and sociodemographic) and the CAHPS outcomes using bivariate statistical tests and multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: The final sample included 1,151 patients, with 431 diagnosed with leukemia and 720 diagnosed with lymphoma (median time from diagnosis to survey 6 months). Patients who completed the survey further apart from the diagnosis date reported significantly higher adjusted ratings of care overall (β .39, p = .008) than those closer to diagnosis. American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, and Pacific Islander patients had lower adjusted ratings of care overall (β - .73, p = .003) than Non-Hispanic white patients. Multimorbidity was significantly associated with higher adjusted personal doctor ratings (β .26, p = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable patient experiences among older adults diagnosed with hematologic malignancies warrant targeted efforts to measure and improve care quality. Future measurement of experiences of cancer care soon after diagnosis, coupled with careful sampling of high-priority populations, will inform oncology leaders and clinicians on strategies to improve care for high-risk, high-cost populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS); Health care quality; Hematologic diseases; Patient experience

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33566250      PMCID: PMC7946754          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01395-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  29 in total

1.  Differences in CAHPS adult survey reports and ratings by race and ethnicity: an analysis of the National CAHPS benchmarking data 1.0.

Authors:  L S Morales; M N Elliott; R Weech-Maldonado; K L Spritzer; R D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Thomas M Habermann; Edie A Weller; Vicki A Morrison; Randy D Gascoyne; Peter A Cassileth; Jeffrey B Cohn; Shaker R Dakhil; Bruce Woda; Richard I Fisher; Bruce A Peterson; Sandra J Horning
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; David E Kanouse; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Frailty and the management of hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Gregory A Abel; Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

6.  Examining urban and rural differences in perceived timeliness of care among cancer patients: A SEER-CAHPS study.

Authors:  Michelle A Mollica; Kathryn E Weaver; Timothy S McNeel; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Management of acute myelogenous leukemia in the elderly.

Authors:  Ramalingam Rathnasabapathy; Jeffrey E Lancet
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29

9.  The health care experience of patients with cancer during the last year of life: Analysis of the SEER-CAHPS data set.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Matthew P Urato; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Delays in referral and diagnosis for chronic hematologic malignancies: a literature review.

Authors:  Gregory A Abel; Christopher R Friese; Lysa S Magazu; Lisa C Richardson; Maria E Fernandez; Juan Jaime De Zengotita; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2008-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.

Authors:  Saleh A Alessy; Mohammed Alhajji; Janette Rawlinson; Matthew Baker; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

2.  Living with or beyond lymphoma: A rapid review of the unmet needs of lymphoma survivors.

Authors:  Vanessa Boland; Amanda Drury; Greg Sheaf; Anne-Marie Brady
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.955

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.