Literature DB >> 33565988

Acceptability, Validity, and Engagement With a Mobile App for Frequent, Continuous Multiyear Assessment of Youth Health Behaviors (mNCANDA): Mixed Methods Study.

Kevin M Cummins1,2,3, Ty Brumback4, Tammy Chung5, Raeanne C Moore2, Trevor Henthorn6, Sonja Eberson2, Alyssa Lopez7, Tatev Sarkissyan8, Kate B Nooner9, Sandra A Brown1,2, Susan F Tapert2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies of many health behaviors often rely on infrequent self-report assessments. The measurement of psychoactive substance use among youth is expected to improve with more frequent mobile assessments, which can reduce recall bias. Researchers have used mobile devices for longitudinal research, but studies that last years and assess youth continuously at a fine-grained, temporal level (eg, weekly) are rare. A tailored mobile app (mNCANDA [mobile National Consortium on Alcohol and Neurodevelopment in Adolescence]) and a brief assessment protocol were designed specifically to provide a feasible platform to elicit responses to health behavior assessments in longitudinal studies, including NCANDA (National Consortium on Alcohol and Neurodevelopment in Adolescence).
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether an acceptable mobile app system could provide repeatable and valid assessment of youth's health behaviors in different developmental stages over extended follow-up.
METHODS: Participants were recruited (n=534; aged 17-28 years) from a larger longitudinal study of neurodevelopment. Participants used mNCANDA to register reports of their behaviors for up to 18 months. Response rates as a function of time measured using mNCANDA and participant age were modeled using generalized estimating equations to evaluate response rate stability and age effects. Substance use reports captured using mNCANDA were compared with responses from standardized interviews to assess concurrent validity. Reactivity was assessed by evaluating patterns of change in substance use after participants initiated weekly reports via mNCANDA. Quantitative feedback about the app was obtained from the participants. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants who used the app for at least one month to obtain feedback on user experience, user-derived explanations of some quantitative results, and suggestions for system improvements.
RESULTS: The mNCANDA protocol adherence was high (mean response rate 82%, SD 27%) and stable over time across all age groups. The median time to complete each assessment was 51 s (mean response time 1.14, SD 1.03 min). Comparisons between mNCANDA and interview self-reports on recent (previous 30 days) alcohol and cannabis use days demonstrate close agreement (eg, within 1 day of reported use) for most observations. Models used to identify reactivity failed to detect changes in substance use patterns subsequent to enrolling in mNCANDA app assessments (P>.39). Most participants (64/76, 84%) across the age range reported finding the mNCANDA system acceptable. Participants provided recommendations for improving the system (eg, tailoring signaling times).
CONCLUSIONS: mNCANDA provides a feasible, multi-year, continuous, fine-grained (eg, weekly) assessment of health behaviors designed to minimize respondent burden and provides acceptable regimes for long-term self-reporting of health behaviors. Fine-grained characterization of variability in behaviors over relatively long periods (eg, up to 18 months) may, through the use of mNCANDA, improve our understanding of the relationship between substance use exposure and neurocognitive development. ©Kevin M Cummins, Ty Brumback, Tammy Chung, Raeanne C Moore, Trevor Henthorn, Sonja Eberson, Alyssa Lopez, Tatev Sarkissyan, Kate B Nooner, Sandra A Brown, Susan F Tapert. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 10.02.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol drinking; health behavior; illicit drugs; mobile applications; mobile phone; self-report; smartphone; underage drinking; young adults

Year:  2021        PMID: 33565988      PMCID: PMC7904399          DOI: 10.2196/24472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  45 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research.

Authors:  Frances K Del Boca; Jack Darkes
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Validity of adolescent self-report of substance use.

Authors:  Robert J Williams; Nadine Nowatzki
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  How many versus how much: 52 weeks of alcohol consumption in emerging adults.

Authors:  Mark S Goldman; Paul E Greenbaum; Jack Darkes; Karen Obremski Brandon; Frances K Del Boca
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-03

5.  Estimating under- and over-reporting of drinking in national surveys of alcohol consumption: identification of consistent biases across four English-speaking countries.

Authors:  Tim Stockwell; Jinhui Zhao; Thomas Greenfield; Jessica Li; Michael Livingston; Yang Meng
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Social contexts of momentary craving to smoke among Korean American emerging adults.

Authors:  Jimi Huh; Christian J Cerrada; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Genevieve Dunton; Adam M Leventhal
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Study Tobacco Behavior in Urban India: There's an App for That.

Authors:  Andrea Soong; Julia Cen Chen; Dina Lg Borzekowski
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-06-24

8.  Implementation of a Substance Use Recovery Support Mobile Phone App in Community Settings: Qualitative Study of Clinician and Staff Perspectives of Facilitators and Barriers.

Authors:  Sarah Lord; Sarah K Moore; Alex Ramsey; Susan Dinauer; Kimberly Johnson
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2016-06-28

9.  Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) for Usability Assessment of Mobile Health Technology: Validation Study.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Hwayoung Cho; Jianfang Liu
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Project CHOICE: Choosing healthy options in coping with emotions, an EMA/EMI plus in-person intervention for alcohol use.

Authors:  Claire E Blevins; Eliza L Marsh; Michael D Stein; Heather T Schatten; Ana M Abrantes
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.716

View more
  1 in total

1.  Chinese Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation.

Authors:  Shuqing Zhao; Yingjuan Cao; Heng Cao; Kao Liu; Xiaoyan Lv; Jinxin Zhang; Yuxin Li; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.