Chien-Liang Fang1,2, Chong-Bin Tsai3,4, Ming-Shan Chen5,6, Hsin-Yi Yang7, Kai-Jan Fang8. 1. Division of Plastic and Reconstruction Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan. 2. Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan. 4. Department of Optometry, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan. 6. Department of Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan. 7. Clinical Medical Research Center, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi City, Taiwan. 8. Concordia Middle School, Chia-Yi County, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Suction-curettage using an arthroscopic shaver is the most effective surgical treatment for bromhidrosis; however, information regarding the procedure is limited. This study investigated the factors that affect the efficacy of suction-curettage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data for 215 patients (430 axillae) with bromhidrosis treated with suction-curettage using an arthroscopic shaver between 2011 and 2019. RESULTS: Excellent or good efficacy with improved malodor was achieved in 418 axillae (97.21%). Secondary suction-curettage was performed for 11 (2.56%), with excellent results. Efficacy and need for secondary suction-curettage were not associated with age, sex, shaving time, and tumescent infiltration use. Complications were observed in 52 (12.09%) axillae, including hematoma or seroma, epidermis decortication, skin necrosis, and infections; 10 (2.33%) required local debridement for wounds. Complications showed a significant difference with respect to age (p < .001). Pain scores on postoperative Day 2 were significantly lower for patients treated using tumescent infiltration than those for the others (1.65 ± 0.84 vs 4.57 ± 1.16; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that 7 to 15 minutes of suction curettage using an arthroscopic shaver is sufficient to achieve good efficacy for bromhidrosis with few complications. Older age was a risk factor for complications, and tumescent infiltration use achieved good postoperative pain control. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: II.
BACKGROUND: Suction-curettage using an arthroscopic shaver is the most effective surgical treatment for bromhidrosis; however, information regarding the procedure is limited. This study investigated the factors that affect the efficacy of suction-curettage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data for 215 patients (430 axillae) with bromhidrosis treated with suction-curettage using an arthroscopic shaver between 2011 and 2019. RESULTS: Excellent or good efficacy with improved malodor was achieved in 418 axillae (97.21%). Secondary suction-curettage was performed for 11 (2.56%), with excellent results. Efficacy and need for secondary suction-curettage were not associated with age, sex, shaving time, and tumescent infiltration use. Complications were observed in 52 (12.09%) axillae, including hematoma or seroma, epidermis decortication, skin necrosis, and infections; 10 (2.33%) required local debridement for wounds. Complications showed a significant difference with respect to age (p < .001). Pain scores on postoperative Day 2 were significantly lower for patients treated using tumescent infiltration than those for the others (1.65 ± 0.84 vs 4.57 ± 1.16; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that 7 to 15 minutes of suction curettage using an arthroscopic shaver is sufficient to achieve good efficacy for bromhidrosis with few complications. Older age was a risk factor for complications, and tumescent infiltration use achieved good postoperative pain control. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: II.