Literature DB >> 33565197

A prospective STudy using invAsive haemodynamic measurements foLLowing catheter ablation for AF and early HFpEF: STALL AF-HFpEF.

Hariharan Sugumar1,2,3,4, Shane Nanayakkara1,2,5, Donna Vizi2, Leah Wright1, David Chieng1,2,3,4, Angeline Leet1,2,5, Justin A Mariani1,2,5, Aleksandr Voskoboinik1,2, Sandeep Prabhu1,2, Andrew J Taylor1,2,5, Jonathan M Kalman3,4, Peter M Kistler1,2,4, David M Kaye1,2,5, Liang-Han Ling1,2,4.   

Abstract

AIMS: The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in early heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unknown. Our aim was to determine the impact of AF ablation on symptoms and exercise haemodynamic parameters of early HFpEF. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Symptomatic AF patients referred for index AF ablation with ejection fraction ≥50% underwent baseline quality of life questionnaires, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, exercise right heart catheterisation (exRHC), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing. HFpEF was defined by resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥15 mmHg or peak exercise PCWP ≥25 mmHg. Patients with HFpEF were offered AF ablation and follow-up exRHC ≥6 months post-ablation. Of 54 patients undergoing baseline evaluation, 35 (65%) had HFpEF identified by exRHC. HFpEF patients were older (64 ± 10 vs. 54 ± 13 years, P < 0.01), and more frequently female (54% vs. 16%, P < 0.01), hypertensive (63% vs. 16%, P < 0.001), and suffering persistent AF (66% vs. 11%, P < 0.001), compared to those without HFpEF. Twenty HFpEF patients underwent AF ablation and follow-up exRHC 12 ± 6 months post-ablation. Nine (45%) patients no longer fulfilled exRHC criteria for HFpEF at follow-up. Patients remaining arrhythmia free (n = 9, 45%) showed significant improvements in peak exercise PCWP (29 ± 4 to 23 ± 2 mmHg, P < 0.01) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) score (55 ± 30 to 22 ± 30, P < 0.01) while the remainder did not (PCWP 31 ± 5 to 30.0 ± 4 mmHg, P = NS; MLHF score 55 ± 23 to 25 ± 20, P = NS).
CONCLUSION: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction frequently coexists in patients with symptomatic AF and preserved ejection fraction. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with comorbid AF and HFpEF improves haemodynamic parameters, BNP and symptoms associated with HFpEF.
© 2021 European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Exercise wedge pressure; HFpEF; Improvement; Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; Reversal; Sinus rhythm

Year:  2021        PMID: 33565197     DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  12 in total

Review 1.  Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Kazunori Omote; Frederik H Verbrugge; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 2.  Management of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Heart Failure-an Interventionalist's Point of View.

Authors:  Jason A Gencher; Nathaniel M Hawkins; Marc W Deyell; Jason G Andrade
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-03-30

3.  Identification of Patients with Preclinical Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction Using the H2FPEF Score.

Authors:  Katlyn E Koepp; Yogesh N V Reddy; Masaru Obokata; Hidemi Sorimachi; Frederik H Verbrugge; C Charles Jain; Alexander C Egbe; Margaret M Redfield; Thomas P Olson; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Nat Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-01-12

4.  Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: Prime time for ablation!

Authors:  Isabel Deisenhofer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17

5.  The H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF algorithms for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Shiro Amanai; Tomonari Harada; Kazuki Kagami; Kuniko Yoshida; Toshimitsu Kato; Naoki Wada; Masaru Obokata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: An alternative paradigm to explain the clinical implications of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jonathan P Ariyaratnam; Adrian D Elliott; Ricardo S Mishima; Celine Gallagher; Dennis H Lau; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17

7.  Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert Schönbauer; Andreas A Kammerlander; Franz Duca; Stefan Aschauer; Matthias Koschutnik; Carolina Dona; Christian Nitsche; Christian Loewe; Christian Hengstenberg; Julia Mascherbauer
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-12-05

8.  The prognostic impact of mechanical atrial dysfunction and atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jerremy Weerts; Arantxa Barandiarán Aizpurua; Michiel T H M Henkens; Aurore Lyon; Manouk J W van Mourik; Mathijs R A A van Gemert; Anne Raafs; Sandra Sanders-van Wijk; Antoni Bayés-Genís; Stephane R B Heymans; Harry J G M Crijns; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Joost Lumens; Vanessa P M van Empel; Christian Knackstedt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Right atrial pressure represents cumulative cardiac burden in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Reika Nagata; Tomonari Harada; Kazunori Omote; Hiroyuki Iwano; Kotaro Yoshida; Toshimitsu Kato; Koji Kurosawa; Toshiyuki Nagai; Toshihisa Anzai; Masaru Obokata
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 10.  Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Heart Failure With Mid-Range Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Micha T Maeder; Lukas Weber; Marc Buser; Roman Brenner; Lucas Joerg; Hans Rickli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.