Literature DB >> 33564431

Poor allograft outcome in Indian patients with post-transplant C3 glomerulopathy.

Ashwani Kumar1, Raja Ramachandran2, Amit Rawat3, Reena Das4, Charan S Rayat1, Deepesh B Kenwar5, Ashish Sharma5, Krishan L Gupta2, Ritambhra Nada1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) results from dysfunction of the alternative complement pathway (ACP). No data are available on post-transplant C3G in South Asia.
METHODS: In this study, renal allograft biopsies of C3G patients performed from 2012 to 2017 were analysed for ACP functional assay (APFA), serum complement levels, complement factor H (CFH), complement factor B (CFB) and autoantibodies to CFH and CFB. Limited genetic screening for CFH/CFHR5 genes was carried out. All study patients were also followed up.
RESULTS: A total of 21 cases of C3G were included, of which 11 had native C3G disease (that is, recurrent C3G). Of these 11 recurrent cases, 7 presented with allograft dysfunction and 4 with proteinuria and renal dysfunction. Early post-transplant recurrence (<1 month) was noted in six patients, whereas recurrence in five patients occurred within 8-17 months of transplant. Biopsies showed mild focal mesangial expansion with or without endocapillary proliferation and thrombotic microangiopathy. Rejection was also noted in six patients. APFA/C3 levels were low in all cases. Serum CFH levels were low [dense deposit disease (DDD), 44%; C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN), 25%], whereas CFB levels were normal. Autoantibodies to CFH, CFB and C3 nephritic factor were present in 11, 0 and 44% of DDD cases, respectively, and in 17, 17 and 33% of C3GN cases, respectively. Genetic analysis revealed only non-pathogenic CFH gene variants (93%). No novel mutation was found. At follow-up (140 months), stable graft was noted in 28% of cases, progressive renal failure in 19%, graft loss in 34%, and 19% of patients died.
CONCLUSION: Post-transplant C3G can present with graft dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Subtle histological findings demand careful interpretation of immunofluorescence results. Autoantibodies to complement pathway regulatory proteins are common, and no novel mutation has been found from limited genetic workup. Clinical outcome is poor.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complement; end-stage renal disease; kidney transplantation; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; renal biopsy

Year:  2019        PMID: 33564431      PMCID: PMC7857824          DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Kidney J        ISSN: 2048-8505


INTRODUCTION

Complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G), which includes dense deposit disease (DDD) and C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN), is associated with abnormalities in the alternative complement pathway (ACP) [1-3]. Data on prevalence, progression, outcome and post-kidney transplant recurrence of C3G are still evolving, and reports from South Asia are scanty. Zand et al. published the largest study describing clinical findings, outcomes and detailed pathology of post-transplant C3GN (tx-C3GN) [4]. The authors observed that DDD and C3GN had almost similar rates of recurrence and post-transplant progression. To the best of our knowledge, studies on C3G documenting serological and genetic profiles in post-kidney transplant settings are limited to a few case reports only [5-9]. Most of the studies are from developed nations, and data from low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs) are sparse and likely to be different due to differences in triggering factors and genetic background. Investigating post-transplant C3G (tx-C3G) patients in LMICs would help in planning alternative strategies, such as intensive immunosuppression and plasma exchange, due to non-availability and unaffordability of eculizumab in these countries. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate C3G in post-kidney transplant patients in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

In this study, all renal allograft biopsies performed at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, from January 2012 to December 2017 were screened. The inclusion criterion was the presence of C3 as demonstrated by ≥2 magnitude positivity on immunofluorescence (IF), in the absence or presence of trace amounts of other immunoglobulins. Of a total of 1445 renal allograft biopsies, 26 cases of tx-C3G were identified. Electron microscopy (EM) results were not available in five cases. Hence, serological and genetic testing was performed in the remaining 21 cases of tx-C3G (Figure 1). For serological and genetic workup, a total of 6 ml blood was collected (3mL in plain vial and 3mL in EDTA vial). Serum/plasma/DNA samples were isolated and stored at –80°C for subsequent use. Due to limited funding, genetic analysis for CFH and CFHR5 genes were done in all tx-C3G cases.
FIGURE. 1

Flow diagram showing an overview of C3GP cases for serological and genetic workup.

Flow diagram showing an overview of C3GP cases for serological and genetic workup. Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients prior to sample collection. This study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee (Histopath/13/2088).

Serology

The ACP was assessed by measuring alternative pathway functional assay (APFA) and by measuring complements (C3 and C4), complement factor H (CFH) and complement factor B (CFB) levels. Serum samples were screened for paraproteins and autoantibodies to CFH (ab-CFH), CFB (ab-CFB) and C3 convertase (C3Nef) as described previously by Sethi et al. [10] and Nada et al. [11]

Genetic workup

All exons of the CFH and CFHR5 genes, as well as their adjoining intronic regions, were screened using polymerase chain reaction, followed by Sanger sequencing. DNA samples of 45 healthy individuals were collected, and all gene variants found in tx-C3G patients were also assessed for control cases [11].

Follow-up

Patients were treated as per their treating units’ management protocols. All cases were followed up for a period of 5–140 months. End points at follow-up included stable graft, progressive disease/graft loss and death. Other transplant-related events, including rejection, drug toxicity, infections and recurrence of native disease, were also noted.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as number, percentage, mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range, as appropriate. For comparisons between tx-DDD and tx-C3GN cases, the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used. A P-value <0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

Clinical features

The study cohort comprised 21 patients diagnosed with tx-C3G (9 patients with tx-DDD; 12 with tx-C3GN). There was a male predominance, with a male:female ratio of 3:1, and the mean age was 31.33 ± 12.5 years (range 16–60 years). The prevalence of tx-DDD and tx-C3GN was 0.62 and 0.83%, respectively. The native disease was known in 12 patients (DDD: 6 patients; C3GN: 5 patients; type 1 diabetes mellitus: 1 patient), and unknown in 9 cases. Seven (33%) patients had a history of infections before onset of native disease. Three (14%) patients had a family history of renal disease. Live-related and deceased-donor transplantations accounted for 17 (81%) and 4 (19%) patients, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1.

Clinical details of pre-/post-transplant workup for DDD and C3GN patients

Patient IDPre-transplant workup
Post-transplant workup
Age/ sexNative diseaseTime to progress to ESRDOther findingsDonorInduction and immunosuppressionPost-tx diagnosisPost-tx presentationSerum creatinine at presentation (mg/dL)Proteinuria at presentation (g/day)Serum creatinine at last follow-up (mg/dL)Graft statusPost- transplant follow-up
127/MDDD3 monthsHistory of TBDeceasedATG and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD<1 week1.50.851.3Graft loss19 months
216/MDDD2 monthsNAMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD<1 month3.80.534.2Graft loss35 months
320/FDDD12 monthsHistory of UTIMotherATG and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD<1 week2.03.41.3Expired with stable graft function18 months
419/FDDD3 monthsHistory of UTIGrandmotherATG and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD2 weeks2.91.26.5Graft loss40 months
526/MUnknown<1 monthFamily history of renal diseaseWifeNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD5 months1.82.53.6Progressive disease87 months
623/MUnknown2 monthsNADeceasedATG and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD5 months1.61.21.2Expired with functioning graft40 months
728/FDDD14 monthsHistory of UTIMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD8 months2.52.33.8Graft loss58 months
860/MUnknown<1 monthAlternative medicineSonNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD8 months2.0NA5.2Graft loss73 months
930/MDDD<1 monthFamily history of renal diseaseMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsDDD11 months1.150.974.2Progressive disease32 months
1025/MUnknown6 monthsHistory of TBMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN<1 week5.00.93.1Progressive disease64 months
1127/MC3GN<1 monthsNAMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN<1 week2.4NA3.8Expired5 months
1236/MT1DM30 monthsNAWifeBasiliximab and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN<1 week2.62.51.5Stable graft function81 months
1345/FUnknown6 monthsNADeceasedBasiliximab and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN<1 week4.8NA1.3Stable graft function34 months
1432/MC3GN12 monthsNAMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN1 week1.452.52.9Graft loss28 months
1548/MUnknown2 monthsHistory of TBWifeBasiliximab and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN<2 weeks3.1NA1.2Stable graft function47 months
1623/MC3GN8 monthsNAMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN12 months2.23.45.6Expired (graft loss)24 months
1721/MC3GN12 monthsFamily history of renal diseaseDeceasedATG and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN12 months1.9NA1.5Stable graft function48 months
1823/MC3GN24 monthsHistory of TBMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN17 months2.80.81.4Stable graft function42 months
1940/MUnknown8 monthsAlternative medicineSisterATG and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN24 months1.9NA1.2Stable graft function51 months
2035/MUnknown36 monthsNAMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN27 months1.2NA3.3Progressive disease80 months
2147/FUnknown6 monthsNAMotherNone and TAC/MMF/steroidsC3GN15 months3.73.94.2Graft loss140 months

ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; F, female; M, male; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; NA, not available; TAC, tacrolimus; TB, tuberculosis; UTI, urinary tract infection.

Clinical details of pre-/post-transplant workup for DDD and C3GN patients ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; F, female; M, male; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; NA, not available; TAC, tacrolimus; TB, tuberculosis; UTI, urinary tract infection. Of 21 tx-C3G cases, 10 (47.6%) patients presented within 1 month of kidney transplant. Of the 11 recurrent cases, 7 patients presented with allograft dysfunction, and 4 with proteinuria and renal dysfunction. There was evidence of rejection and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity in seven (33%) and three (14%) patients, respectively. Six (28.5%) patients received induction therapy, and the initial maintenance immunosuppression regimen consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and oral prednisolone in all cases. Four patients received plasma exchange (PLEX) for the treatment of recurrent disease. Of four treated, immediate reduction in serum creatinine was noted in three patients, and all three patients who showed response to plasma exchange (PLEX) had autoantibodies to complement pathway regulators.

DDD

The mean time of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was <3 months in the majority of cases (78%) after an initial diagnosis of DDD in native biopsies. All nine cases of tx-DDD were diagnosed within 1 year post-transplant, with four (44.4%) patients presenting within 1 month and five (55.6%) patients between 1 and 12 months. Patients had allograft dysfunction either with proteinuria (28%) or without (72%). Patients who presented with DDD within 1 month had relatively higher mean serum creatinine levels (2.9 ± 1.01 mg/dL) and less proteinuria (0.9 ± 0.3 g/day), as compared with those who presented later.

C3GN

The mean time of progression to ESRD was 12.5 ± 11 months (range 4–24 months) after an initial diagnosis of C3GN in native biopsies. Six (50%) patients presented with ESRD within 1 month post-transplant, while the remaining six presented within 1–27 months. Patients had allograft dysfunction either with proteinuria (25%) or without (75%), as observed in patients with DDD. Patients who presented with C3GN within 1 month had a mean serum creatinine level of 2.87 ± 1.23 mg/dL and proteinuria of 2.5 ± 0.92 g/day. Patients who presented later had a mean serum creatinine level of 2.3 ± 0.96 mg/dL and proteinuria of 2.53 ± 2.19 g/day.

Pathology

In patients presenting early with tx-DDD, subtle histopathological findings were observed, including mild focal and segmental mesangial expansion with or without endocapillary proliferation. Cases of tx-DDD diagnosed after 1 year post-transplant showed an membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) pattern (Table 2; Figure 2). Patients with C3GN in native biopsies (n = 3) showed a mesangioproliferative pattern with crescents in 16.6% of cases. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was present in three cases of tx-DDD, but was not found in cases of tx-C3GN. Patients presenting with tx-C3GN also displayed similar histopathological findings to those who presented with tx-DDD after 1 year (Table 3; Figure 2). In the majority of cases presenting early (<1 month) with tx-C3G, IF showed focal and segmental staining for C3, with granular deposits mostly in the mesangium; in contrast, in cases that presented late, IF revealed global and diffuse C3 staining, similar to that seen in native MPGN cases. In all graft biopsies analysed, EM showed deposits limited in distribution and amount in early-presenting cases, compared with cases that presented late post-transplant. Late-presenting cases displayed intramembranous/mesangial osmiophilic deposits in DDD, and subendothelial/mesangial deposits in C3GN.
Table 2.

Detailed histopathological findings in DDD

Patient IDPre-transplant morphologyPost-transplant morphologyIF findingsEM findingsHistological lesions (as per Banff classification)
1MPGNMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+)Intramembranous, mesangialNon-specific changes
2Mesangioproliferative patternMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+), IgM (1+), kappa (1+)IntramembranousNon-specific changes
3MPGNMild mesangial proliferationC3 (2+), kappa (1+)IntramembranousNon-specific changes—first Bx
Suggestive of CNI toxicity—second Bx
4MPGNMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+), kappa (1+), lambda 1+Intramembranous, mesangialChronic active TCMR (grade 1B)—first Bx
Suggestive of ABMR (C4d negative)—second Bx
IFTA grade 3—third Bx
5NAMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+)IntramembranousIFTA grade 3, suggestive of CNI toxicity—first Bx
Chronic active TCMR (grade 1B)—second Bx
6NAMild focal and segmental mesangial expansionC2 (2+)IntramembranousActive TCMR (grade 1A)
7MPGNFocal and segmental endocapillary and mesangioproliferative patternC3 (2+)IntramembranousNon-specific changes
8NAMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+)IntramembranousIFTA grade 1B
9Mesangiocapillary patternMild mesangial proliferationC3 (2+), IgM (1+)IntramembranousATI, ANS

ABMR, antibody mediated rejection; ANS, arterionephrosclerosis; ATI, acute tubular injury; Bx, biopsy; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NA, not available; TCMR, T cell mediated rejection.

FIGURE. 2

A case of tx-DDD showing (a) a membranoproliferative pattern and interstitial foam cells; (b) IF showing coarse granular C3 in subendothelial (green color), mesangial (green color) and Bowman’s capsule; and (c) EM showing dense osmiophilic intramembranous deposits (asterisks) with occasional mesangial deposits. A case of tx-C3GN showing (d) segmental mesangial proliferation (asterisk); (e) IF showing coarse granular C3 deposits in the mesangium and membranes and along Bowman’s capsule; and (f) EM showing subendothelial immune complex-type deposits (arrow). (a) and (d) x20: Periodic Acid -Schiff (PAS) staining; (b) x20 and (e) x10: IF staining for C3 using fluorescein isocyanate (FITC) antibody; (c) x1500 and (f) x1200: Uranyl Acetate staining for EM, original magnification.

Table 3.

Detailed histopathological findings in C3GN

Patient IDPre-transplant morphologyPost-transplant morphologyIF findingsEM findingsHistological lesions (as per Banff classification)
10NAMild focal and segmental mesangial expansionC3 (2+), IgM (1+)Subendothelial, mesangialActive TCMR (grade 1A), suggestive of active ABMR
11MPGNMild mesangial proliferationC3 (2+)Subendothelial, mesangialNon-specific changes
12MPGN with refractile membranesMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+)Subendothelial, mesangialNon-specific changes
13NAMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+), IgM (1+)Subendothelial, mesangialNon-specific changes, suggestive of CNI toxicity
14Mesangial expansive pattern with collapseMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+), kappa (2+)Subendothelial, mesangialNon-specific changes—first Bx
Non-specific changes, suggestive of CNI toxicity—second Bx
15NAMild focal and segmental mesangial expansionC3 (3+)MesangialAcute TCMR (grade 1B)—first Bx
Suspicious of ABMR (C4d equivocal positivity)- second Bx
16MPGNMild mesangial proliferationC3 (2+)SubendothelialAcute TCMR (grade 1A), suggestive of ABMR
17MPGNMild focal and segmental mesangial expansionC3 (3+)Subendothelial, mesangialNon-specific changes
18MPGNMild mesangial proliferationC3 (1+)SubendothelialNon-specific changes
19NAMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+)Subendothelial, mesangialANS
20NAMild focal and segmental mesangial expansion with focal basement membrane thickeningC3 (3+)MesangialNon-specific changes
21NAMild mesangial proliferationC3 (3+), IgM (1+)Subendothelial, mesangialNon-specific changes

ABMR, antibody mediated rejection; ANS, arterionephrosclerosis; Bx- biopsy; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NA, not available; TCMR, T cell mediated rejection.

A case of tx-DDD showing (a) a membranoproliferative pattern and interstitial foam cells; (b) IF showing coarse granular C3 in subendothelial (green color), mesangial (green color) and Bowman’s capsule; and (c) EM showing dense osmiophilic intramembranous deposits (asterisks) with occasional mesangial deposits. A case of tx-C3GN showing (d) segmental mesangial proliferation (asterisk); (e) IF showing coarse granular C3 deposits in the mesangium and membranes and along Bowman’s capsule; and (f) EM showing subendothelial immune complex-type deposits (arrow). (a) and (d) x20: Periodic Acid -Schiff (PAS) staining; (b) x20 and (e) x10: IF staining for C3 using fluorescein isocyanate (FITC) antibody; (c) x1500 and (f) x1200: Uranyl Acetate staining for EM, original magnification. Detailed histopathological findings in DDD ABMR, antibody mediated rejection; ANS, arterionephrosclerosis; ATI, acute tubular injury; Bx, biopsy; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NA, not available; TCMR, T cell mediated rejection. Detailed histopathological findings in C3GN ABMR, antibody mediated rejection; ANS, arterionephrosclerosis; Bx- biopsy; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NA, not available; TCMR, T cell mediated rejection.

Serological profile

Low complement activity with APFA was obtained in all cases of tx-C3G. Low C3 levels were found in all cases of tx-C3GN and 89% of tx-DDD cases, whereas C4 levels were normal in all tx-C3G cases. CFH levels were low in 44% of tx-DDD cases and 25% of tx-C3GN cases. CFB levels were normal in the majority of tx-C3G cases, except in one case of tx-DDD and two cases of tx-C3GN that had low CFB levels. ab-CFH was present in one (11%) case of tx-DDD and two (17%) cases of tx-C3GN, whereas ab-CFB was present in only two (17%) cases of tx-C3GN. C3Nef was present in 44% of tx-DDD cases (n = 4) and 33% of tx-C3GN cases (n = 4) (Table 4). ab-CFB, ab-CFH and C3Nef were present in 62% of tx-C3G cases. Serum samples tested negative for paraproteins and chronic viral markers (hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus I and II) in all tx-C3G cases. There was no statistically significant difference when we compared all the serological findings between tx-DDD and tx-C3GN cases (P > 0.05).
Table 4.

Serological and genetic profiles of post-transplant DDD and C3GN

Patient IDaC3 values (g/L)C4 values (g/L)APFA values (%)CFH levels (mg/mL)CFB levels (mg/mL)ab-CFHab-CFBC3NefCFH gene variants
10.310.2612.81161.24264.57000ND
20.290.190.50401.50165.61ND00rs1061147 c.921A>C, rs1061170 c.1204C>T
31.690.349.15368.47183.9000PositiveND
40.670.331.35106.13185.6900Positivers800292 c.184G>A, rs1061147 c.921A>C, rs1061170 c.1204C>T, rs2274700 c.1419G>A
50.660.358.3135.82208.63ND0Positivers800292 c.184G>A, IVS2-18TT, rs1061170 c.1204C>T, rs2274700 c.1419G>A
60.430.233.17295.7996.76000ND
70.230.3310.61136.23217.96Positive00ND
80.140.230.84370.92154.13000ND
90.360.3510.50444.6338.68ND0Positivers800292 c.184G>A, rs1061147 c.921A>C, rs1061170 c.1204C>T
100.330.199.15409.32127.13000rs1061147 c.921A>C, rs1061170 c.1204C>T
110.450.311.70141.49156.1Positive00rs1061147 c.921A>C, rs1061170 c.1204C>T
120.230.258.65223.7130.760Positive0IVS2-18TT, rs1061170 c.1204C>T
130.770.3016.38369.22138.13ND00rs1061147 c.921A>C, rs1061170 c.1204C>T
140.730.208.99375.28102.79000ND
150.690.199.49393.44125.1930Positivers1061170 c.1204C>T
160.230.229.32359.89112.4500Positivers1061147 c.921A>C, rs2274700 c.1419G>A
170.560.3210.16164.69126.74Positive00IVS2-18TT, rs1061170 c.1204C>T
180.230.309.83396.71114.5700PositiveND
190.740.269.15373.76211.71ND0PositiveND
200.310.3316.21366.7064.750Positive0rs800292 c.184G>A, rs1061147 c.921A>C, rs1061170 c.1204C>T, rs2274700 c.1419G>A
210.340.328.99354.3599.90300rs800292 c.184G>A, IVS2-18TT, rs1061170 c.1204C>T

Normal values: C3, 0.89–1.87 g/L; C4, 0.165–0.38 g/L; APFA, 28–51%; CFH, 225–760 mg/mL; CFB, 85–227 mg/mL.

Patients 1–9: DDD; patients 10–21: C3GN.

ND, not done.

Serological and genetic profiles of post-transplant DDD and C3GN Normal values: C3, 0.89–1.87 g/L; C4, 0.165–0.38 g/L; APFA, 28–51%; CFH, 225–760 mg/mL; CFB, 85–227 mg/mL. Patients 1–9: DDD; patients 10–21: C3GN. ND, not done.

Genetic workup for CFH and CFHR5 genes

A total of five CFH gene variants were detected in this post-transplant series. These variants were in exon 2 (rs800292, p.Val62Iso), exon 3 (IVS2-18TT insertion), exon 7 (rs1061147, p.Ala243Ala), exon 9 (rs1061170, p.His402Tyr) and exon 10 (rs2274700, p.Ala473Ala) (Table 4). Mutational screening of all exons in the CFHR5 gene did not show any variants. At least one CFH gene variant was present in 93% of cases. Two or more gene variants in combination were noted in a single case (Table 4). There was no statistically significant difference between the tx-DDD and tx-C3GN groups (P > 0.05).

Outcome

Mean follow-up period for tx-C3G patients was 50 months (5–140 months). We expressed patient outcome in terms of stable graft function, progressive renal failure, graft loss and death, and not according to treatment of recurrent disease. Of the 21 tx-C3G patients, stable graft function was observed in 33% (n = 7), progressive renal failure in 43% (n = 9), graft loss in 5% (n = 1) and death in 19% (n = 4) of patients. Patients in the tx-DDD group were followed up for 19–87 months. Two patients (22%) had progressive renal failure, and five (56%) progressed to graft loss. Two patients (22%) died with functioning graft at 16 and 40 months post-transplant, respectively, due to an unrelated cause (Table 1). In the tx-C3GN group, patients were followed up for 5–140 months. Stable graft function was observed in six patients (50%), and progressive renal failure in two (17%). Two patients (17%) died, one as a result of graft failure within a year (due to non-compliance and financial constraints) and the other at 24 months post-transplant with unknown reasons (Table 1). No correlation was found when we compared serological profiles with final patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we evaluated the ACP (using serological and limited genetic analyses) in tx-C3G patients and compared these findings with clinical outcomes. Demographic profiles of tx-DDD and tx-C3GN patients were consistent with those from previous studies [1, 2, 4, 12]. In the present study, patients who presented early post-transplant (within 1 month) had increased serum creatinine levels only, whereas those who presented late post-transplant (>1 month) had proteinuria. Native biopsies from recurrent cases also showed MPGN/mesangiocapillary patterns, as noted in other case series [4, 13, 14]. Time of progression to ESRD was shorter for both tx-DDD and tx-C3GN patients (<1 year) in our study cohort, compared with Western patient populations (within 10 years for both DDD and C3GN) [4, 8, 15–17]. This rapid progression to ESRD in our study could be due to late presentation and unavailability/unaffordability of disease-specific therapy (eculizumab). Histological findings at the time of post-transplant diagnosis were subtle and included focal mesangial proliferation in both tx-DDD and tx-C3GN patients, in agreement with other histological reports in the literature [3, 4, 7, 8, 14–16, 18, 19]. There are few studies/case reports documenting the serology, ab-CFH/CFB or C3Nef and gene variants for C3G/atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) in post-transplant settings [5, 20–25]. There are reports documenting low C3 levels, as well as low levels of other complement regulatory proteins, in C3G and low serological factors as probable causes of complement dysregulation [26-29], although all data are from native biopsies. No study has evaluated the serological profile post-transplant. Regunathan-Shenk et al. [30] recently published a series of 21 cases with autoantibody profiles similar to those in our present study, except for ab-CFB, which, to our knowledge, has not been reported in other post-transplant studies. The authors [30] described a high recurrence rate and a relatively longer post-transplant period in their study patients with DDD, compared to those in our study. A comparative summary of our study results and those from Regunathan-Shenk et al. [30] and Zand et al. [4] is given in Table 5.
Table 5.

Comparison of tx-C3G findings

Present study (n = 21)
Regunathan-Shenk et al. [30] (n = 19)
Zand et al. [4] (n = 21)
Median follow-up 50 months
Median follow-up 76 months
Median follow-up 73.9 months
DDDC3GNDDDC3GNC3GN
Recurrence rate (%)6742858367
Time to recurrence (months)8 (<2 weeks in 45% of patients)16 (<2 weeks in 50% of patients)151428
Graft loss (%)56388525
Time to graft loss (months)10444277
Abnormal ACP (%)10010080
Low CFH (%)4425
Low CFB (%)1117
Low CFI (%) 10
C3Nef (%)443350
C5Nef (%) 10
ab-CFH (%)111710
ab-CFB (%)C3GN (17%)
All gene variants (%)30
CFH/CFHR5 (%)93 (CFH variants)

ab-CFB, autoantibodies to CFB; ab-CFH, autoantibodies to CFH; CFI, autoantibodies to CFI.

Comparison of tx-C3G findings ab-CFB, autoantibodies to CFB; ab-CFH, autoantibodies to CFH; CFI, autoantibodies to CFI. In our study, 88.9% of tx-DDD patients and 100% of tx-C3GN patients had low C3 levels. In a series of 32 DDD patients, Nasr et al. reported low C3 levels in 100% of paediatric and 41% of adult patients [29]. Sethi et al. described low C3 levels in 75% of C3GN patients [2], and Servais et al. reported low C3 levels in 45% of DDD patients and 37% of C3GN patients [1]. C4 levels were normal in all tx-C3G cases, as observed by Servais et al. and Sethi et al. [1, 2]. APFA showed very low complement activity in all cases of DDD and C3GN, similar to previous studies in Western patient populations [2, 3, 10]. In our study, a higher proportion of tx-DDD patients (44.4%) had low CFH levels compared with tx-C3GN patients (25%). However, both results were higher than those reported by Servais et al. [1] (18.2% of tx-DDD patients and 3.8% of tx-C3GN patients with low CFH levels). Moreover, the percentages of tx-DDD (11%) and tx-C3GN (17%) patients with low CFB levels were comparable in our study, but lower than the percentages reported by Servais et al. [1] (27% of tx-DDD and 26% of tx-C3GN with low CFB levels). The majority of studies evaluating ab-CFH were conducted in patients with aHUS and MPGN [24, 31–33]. Only a few studies have reported on autoantibodies in C3G. ab-CFH were present in 17% of tx-DDD patients and 25% of tx-C3GN patients. Interestingly, cases with ab-CFH had low CFH levels. In two separate studies, Sethi et al. reported ab-CFH in 8–20% of DDD and C3GN cases [2, 10]. Zhang et al. also described ab-CFH in 3% of cases of DDD [3]. In the present study, we found ab-CFB in 17% of tx-C3GN cases, whereas these autoantibodies were previously documented by others in 8–9% of DDD cases only [3, 34]. C3Nef levels were slightly lower than most previous reports in DDD patients (41–86%) and comparable to levels found in C3GN patients (45%) [1–3, 10]. In our study, we did not find paraproteinaemia in tx-C3G cases, whereas Zand et al. reported paraproteinaemia in 31% of patients, which also resulted in early recurrences [35]. Moreover, Sethi et al. reported paraproteinaemia in 71.4% of cases [36]. This difference in findings could be explained by the younger age of our study patients, compared with relatively older patients (mean age 54.5 years) in the studies by Zand et al. and Sethi et al. CFH gene variants were detected in 10–17% of DDD cases [26, 27]. Recent report showed CFH gene variants in 24–37% of C3G patients [37, 38]. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs800292, rs1061147, rs1061170 and rs2274700 are synonymous variants that have been described as significant in aHUS, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and DDD [39-42]. The IVS2-18insTT insertion is a splice site variant that changes the natural acceptor site and was previously reported in DDD [40] and AMD [42]. In the present study, this insertion was more common in C3GN compared with DDD. The variant rs1061170 is the most common SNP (Tyr402His) described in DDD [39-41]. The significance of these variants is still unclear but they have been found to be associated with adverse outcomes in tx-C3G patients in our study. Graft loss reported by Barbour and Gill and Zand et al. was found in 43–50% of patients within 18–21 months [4, 15]. In our study, graft loss was found in one case of tx-DDD at 16 months, while 38% of tx-C3G cases had graft loss, which is slightly lower than in Western patient populations. In addition, 19% of tx-C3G patients in present series died. Three patients who had plasma exchange showed a good initial response and had autoantibodies against C3Nef and ab-CFH [43] (published data, doi: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_78_18). Only limited data are available on use of plasma exchange in the treatment of tx-C3G [22, 24, 32, 44]. In conclusion, our study demonstrated a shorter time to recurrence and graft loss in our patients, which could be explained by differences in management policies in different countries. Our study also showed poor overall outcome of patients with tx-C3G. A limitation of our study is the limited genetic workup assessing for only two genes in the ACP. Other approaches, including whole-genome sequencing/targeted sequencing or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) testing, would be more appropriate for performing genetic screening in these patients.

FUNDING

R.N. received funding from intramural research grant of the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India (Intramural grant number 71/08-Edu-15/1737 dated 04/09/2015).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared. The results presented in this article have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.
  41 in total

1.  C3 glomerulonephritis and dense deposit disease share a similar disease course in a large United States cohort of patients with C3 glomerulopathy.

Authors:  Andrew S Bomback; Dominick Santoriello; Rupali S Avasare; Renu Regunathan-Shenk; Pietro A Canetta; Wooin Ahn; Jai Radhakrishnan; Maddalena Marasa; Paul E Rosenstiel; Leal C Herlitz; Glen S Markowitz; Vivette D D'Agati; Gerald B Appel
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Gene polymorphism of complement factor H in a Turkish patient with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis type II.

Authors:  Betul Sozeri; Sevgi Mir; Afig Berdeli; Nida Dincel; Banu Sarsik
Journal:  Iran J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.892

3.  Anti-Factor B and Anti-C3b Autoantibodies in C3 Glomerulopathy and Ig-Associated Membranoproliferative GN.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Marinozzi; Lubka T Roumenina; Sophie Chauvet; Alexandre Hertig; Dominique Bertrand; Jérome Olagne; Marie Frimat; Tim Ulinski; Georges Deschênes; Stephane Burtey; Michel Delahousse; Bruno Moulin; Christophe Legendre; Véronique Frémeaux-Bacchi; Moglie Le Quintrec
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Complement and glomerular disease: new insights.

Authors:  Matthew Pickering; H Terence Cook
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Recurrent dense deposit disease after renal transplantation: an emerging role for complementary therapies.

Authors:  J A McCaughan; D M O'Rourke; A E Courtney
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Human factor H-related protein 5 has cofactor activity, inhibits C3 convertase activity, binds heparin and C-reactive protein, and associates with lipoprotein.

Authors:  Jennifer L McRae; Thomas G Duthy; Kim M Griggs; Rebecca J Ormsby; Peter J Cowan; Brett A Cromer; William J McKinstry; Michael W Parker; Brendan F Murphy; David L Gordon
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  C3 glomerulonephritis secondary to mutations in factors H and I: rapid recurrence in deceased donor kidney transplant effectively treated with eculizumab.

Authors:  Neetika Garg; Yuzhou Zhang; Anne Nicholson-Weller; Eliyahu V Khankin; Nicolò Ghiringhelli Borsa; Nicole C Meyer; Susan McDermott; Isaac E Stillman; Helmut G Rennke; Richard J Smith; Martha Pavlakis
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Prompt plasma exchanges and immunosuppressive treatment improves the outcomes of anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome in children.

Authors:  Aditi Sinha; Ashima Gulati; Savita Saini; Caroline Blanc; Aarti Gupta; Bahadur Singh Gurjar; Himanshi Saini; Shambhuprasad T Kotresh; Uma Ali; Divya Bhatia; Alpana Ohri; Manish Kumar; Indira Agarwal; Sanjeev Gulati; Kanav Anand; M Vijayakumar; Rajiv Sinha; Sidharth Sethi; Maud Salmona; Anna George; Vineeta Bal; Geetika Singh; Amit K Dinda; Pankaj Hari; Satyajit Rath; Marie-Agnes Dragon-Durey; Arvind Bagga
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  C3 glomerulonephritis: clinicopathological findings, complement abnormalities, glomerular proteomic profile, treatment, and follow-up.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sethi; Fernando C Fervenza; Yuzhou Zhang; Ladan Zand; Julie A Vrana; Samih H Nasr; Jason D Theis; Ahmet Dogan; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  A case of adult atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome related to anti-factor H autoantibodies successfully treated by plasma exchange, corticosteroids and rituximab.

Authors:  Arnaud Lionet; François Provôt; François Glowacki; Veronique Frémeaux-Bacchi; Marc Hazzan
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2009-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.