Literature DB >> 33563868

Soil Sample Preservation Strategy Affects the Microbial Community Structure.

Mariia Pavlovska1,2, Ievgeniia Prekrasna1, Ivan Parnikoza1, Evgen Dykyi1.   

Abstract

Sample preservation is a critical procedure in any research that relies on molecular tools and is conducted in remote areas. Sample preservation options include low and room temperature storage, which require freezing equipment and specific buffering solutions, respectively. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether DNA/RNA Shield 1x from Zymo Research and DESS (Dimethyl sulfoxide, Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, Saturated Salt) solution performed similarly to snap freezing in liquid nitrogen. Soil samples were stored for 1 month in each of the buffers and without any solution at a range of temperatures: -20, +4, and +23°C. All treatments were compared to the "optimal treatment", namely, snap freezing in liquid nitrogen. The quality and quantity of DNA were analyzed, and the microbial community structure was investigated in all samples. The results obtained indicated that the quantity and integrity of DNA was preserved well in all samples; however, the taxonomic distribution was skewed in samples stored without any solution at ambient temperatures, particularly when analyses were performed at lower taxonomic levels. Although both solutions performed equally well, sequencing output and OTU numbers in DESS-treated samples were closer to those snap frozen with liquid nitrogen. Furthermore, DNA/RNA Shield-stored samples performed better for the preservation of rare taxa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DESS; sample preservation; soil microbial communities; storage buffer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33563868      PMCID: PMC7966943          DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME20134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbes Environ        ISSN: 1342-6311            Impact factor:   2.912


  17 in total

1.  Effect of preservation method on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and water samples.

Authors:  Valeria Tatangelo; Andrea Franzetti; Isabella Gandolfi; Giuseppina Bestetti; Roberto Ambrosini
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples.

Authors:  Christian L Lauber; Nicholas Zhou; Jeffrey I Gordon; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) for microbiome studies: bacterial diversity in the ileum of newly weaned Salmonella-infected pigs.

Authors:  Scot E Dowd; Yan Sun; Randy D Wolcott; Alexander Domingo; Jeffery A Carroll
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.171

4.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies.

Authors:  Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Analysing Microbial Community Composition through Amplicon Sequencing: From Sampling to Hypothesis Testing.

Authors:  Luisa W Hugerth; Anders F Andersson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  The effect of DNA degradation bias in passive sampling devices on metabarcoding studies of arthropod communities and their associated microbiota.

Authors:  Henrik Krehenwinkel; Marisa Fong; Susan Kennedy; Edward Greg Huang; Suzuki Noriyuki; Luis Cayetano; Rosemary Gillespie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Correcting for Microbial Blooms in Fecal Samples during Room-Temperature Shipping.

Authors:  Amnon Amir; Daniel McDonald; Jose A Navas-Molina; Justine Debelius; James T Morton; Embriette Hyde; Adam Robbins-Pianka; Rob Knight
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.496

Review 8.  Practical considerations for large-scale gut microbiome studies.

Authors:  Doris Vandeputte; Raul Y Tito; Rianne Vanleeuwen; Gwen Falony; Jeroen Raes
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  Characterization of the fecal microbiota using high-throughput sequencing reveals a stable microbial community during storage.

Authors:  Ian M Carroll; Tamar Ringel-Kulka; Jennica P Siddle; Todd R Klaenhammer; Yehuda Ringel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microbial Population Differentials between Mucosal and Submucosal Intestinal Tissues in Advanced Crohn's Disease of the Ileum.

Authors:  Rodrick J Chiodini; Scot E Dowd; William M Chamberlin; Susan Galandiuk; Brian Davis; Angela Glassing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Antarctic Hairgrass Rhizosphere Microbiomes: Microscale Effects Shape Diversity, Structure, and Function.

Authors:  Ievgeniia Prekrasna; Mariia Pavlovska; Natalia Miryuta; Artem Dzhulai; Evgen Dykyi; Peter Convey; Iryna Kozeretska; Tymur Bedernichek; Ivan Parnikoza
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.596

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.