Literature DB >> 33563632

Continuing to Broaden Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative and Inclusive: ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement.

Edward S Kim1, Thomas S Uldrick2, Caroline Schenkel3, Suanna S Bruinooge3, R Donald Harvey4, Allison Magnuson5, Alexander Spira6, James L Wade7, Mark D Stewart8, Diana Merino Vega8, Julia A Beaver9, Andrea M Denicoff10, Gwynn Ison9, S Percy Ivy10, Suzanne George11, Raymond P Perez12, Patricia A Spears13, William D Tap14, Richard L Schilsky3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria (EC) limit the number of patients who can enroll and potentially benefit from protocol-driven, investigational treatment plans and reduce the generalizability of trial results to the broader population. Following publication of expert stakeholder recommendations for broadening EC in 2017, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Friends of Cancer Research (Friends) convened working groups to produce additional recommendations and analyze the potential impact on clinical trials using real-world data. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Multistakeholder working groups were appointed by an ASCO-Friends leadership group to propose recommendations for more inclusive EC related to: washout periods, concomitant medications, prior therapies, laboratory reference ranges and test intervals, and performance status.
RESULTS: The four working groups, ASCO Board of Directors, and Friends leadership support the recommendations included in this statement to modernize EC related to washout periods, concomitant medications, prior therapies, laboratory references ranges and test intervals, and performance status to make trial populations more inclusive and representative of cancer patient populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the recommendations is intended to result in greater ease of determining patient eligibility. Increased opportunities for patient participation in research will help address longstanding underrepresentation of certain groups in clinical trials and produce evidence that is more informative for a broader patient population. More patients eligible will also likely speed clinical trial accrual.See related commentary by Giantonio, p. 2369. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33563632     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  7 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma Clinical Trials: Current Landscape and Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Stephen J Bagley; Shawn Kothari; Rifaquat Rahman; Eudocia Q Lee; Gavin P Dunn; Evanthia Galanis; Susan M Chang; Louis Burt Nabors; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Roger Stupp; Minesh P Mehta; David A Reardon; Stuart A Grossman; Erik P Sulman; John H Sampson; Simon Khagi; Michael Weller; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mustafa Khasraw
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 13.801

2.  Patients' Perceptions at Diagnosis: Lung Cancer Discovery and Provider Relationships.

Authors:  Darryl Somayaji; Heba Mohedat; Grace E Dean; Suzanne S Dickerson
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.760

3.  Gender profile of principal investigators in a large academic clinical trials group.

Authors:  Vi Thi Thao Luong; Cindy Ho; Veronica Aedo-Lopez; Eva Segelov
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 4.  Improving Cancer Care for Patients With CKD: The Need for Changes in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ben Sprangers; Mark A Perazella; Stuart M Lichtman; Mitchell H Rosner; Kenar D Jhaveri
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 5.  Clinical trial design in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Elena Fountzilas; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Henry Hiep Vo; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 15.266

6.  Envisioning clinical trials as complex interventions.

Authors:  Kristian D Stensland; Laura J Damschroder; Anne E Sales; Anne F Schott; Ted A Skolarus
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.921

7.  Placing a Cancer Diagnosis in Clinical Context: Applying Functional Trajectories to Advanced NSCLC.

Authors:  Heidi A Hamann; David E Gerber
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2022-09-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.