Literature DB >> 33563347

Migration history and risk of psychosis: results from the multinational EU-GEI study.

Ilaria Tarricone1,2, Giuseppe D'Andrea1,3, Hannah E Jongsma4,5, Sarah Tosato6, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson7, Simona A Stilo8,9, Federico Suprani1, Conrad Iyegbe9, Els van der Ven10,11, Diego Quattrone12, Marta di Forti12, Eva Velthorst13,14, Paulo Rossi Menezes15, Celso Arango16, Mara Parellada16, Antonio Lasalvia6, Caterina La Cascia17, Laura Ferraro17, Julio Bobes18, Miguel Bernardo19, Iulio Sanjuán20, Jose Luis Santos21, Manuel Arrojo22, Cristina Marta Del-Ben23, Giada Tripoli9,24, Pierre-Michel Llorca25, Lieuwe de Haan13, Jean-Paul Selten11, Andrea Tortelli26, Andrei Szöke27, Roberto Muratori2, Bart P Rutten11, Jim van Os9,11,28, Peter B Jones5,29, James B Kirkbride4, Domenico Berardi3, Robin M Murray9, Craig Morgan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychosis rates are higher among some migrant groups. We hypothesized that psychosis in migrants is associated with cumulative social disadvantage during different phases of migration.
METHODS: We used data from the EUropean Network of National Schizophrenia Networks studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) case-control study. We defined a set of three indicators of social disadvantage for each phase: pre-migration, migration and post-migration. We examined whether social disadvantage in the pre- and post-migration phases, migration adversities, and mismatch between achievements and expectations differed between first-generation migrants with first-episode psychosis and healthy first-generation migrants, and tested whether this accounted for differences in odds of psychosis in multivariable logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In total, 249 cases and 219 controls were assessed. Pre-migration (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.06-2.44, p = 0.027) and post-migration social disadvantages (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.02-3.51, p = 0.044), along with expectations/achievements mismatch (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.26, p = 0.014) were all significantly associated with psychosis. Migration adversities (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.672-2.06, p = 0.568) were not significantly related to the outcome. Finally, we found a dose-response effect between the number of adversities across all phases and odds of psychosis (⩾6: OR 14.09, 95% CI 2.06-96.47, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative effect of social disadvantages before, during and after migration was associated with increased odds of psychosis in migrants, independently of ethnicity or length of stay in the country of arrival. Public health initiatives that address the social disadvantages that many migrants face during the whole migration process and post-migration psychological support may reduce the excess of psychosis in migrants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  First-episode psychosis; first-generation migrants; migration adversities; migration history; psychosis risk; social disadvantages

Year:  2021        PMID: 33563347     DOI: 10.1017/S003329172000495X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interaction Between Race, Ethnicity, Severe Mental Illness, and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Kevin O'Gallagher; James Th Teo; Ajay M Shah; Fiona Gaughran
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.106

2.  Comparing Risk Factors for Non-affective Psychotic Disorders With Common Mental Disorders Among Migrant Groups: A 25-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 2 Million Migrants.

Authors:  Kelly K Anderson; Britney Le; Jordan Edwards
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

Review 3.  The Influence of the Urban Environment on Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Focus on Air Pollution and Migration-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Giulia Menculini; Francesco Bernardini; Luigi Attademo; Pierfrancesco Maria Balducci; Tiziana Sciarma; Patrizia Moretti; Alfonso Tortorella
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk and Experiences of Childhood Adversity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Grace E Woolway; Sophie E Smart; Amy J Lynham; Jennifer L Lloyd; Michael J Owen; Ian R Jones; James T R Walters; Sophie E Legge
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.