Katharina Sielemann1,2, Bernd Weisshaar3, Boas Pucker1,4. 1. Genetics and Genomics of Plants, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec) & Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. 2. Graduate School DILS, Bielefeld Institute for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (BIBI), Bielefeld University, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. 3. Genetics and Genomics of Plants, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec) & Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. bernd.weisshaar@uni-bielefeld.de. 4. Evolution and Diversity, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dispensability of genes in a phylogenetic lineage, e.g. a species, genus, or higher-level clade, is gaining relevance as most genome sequencing projects move to a pangenome level. Most analyses classify genes as core genes, which are present in all investigated individual genomes, and dispensable genes, which only occur in a single or a few investigated genomes. The binary classification as 'core' or 'dispensable' is often based on arbitrary cutoffs of presence/absence in the analysed genomes. Even when extended to 'conditionally dispensable', this concept still requires the assignment of genes to distinct groups. RESULTS: Here, we present a new method which overcomes this distinct classification by quantifying gene dispensability and present a dedicated tool for reference-based QUantification Of gene Dispensability (QUOD). As a proof of concept, sequence data of 966 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions (Ath-966) were processed to calculate a gene-specific dispensability score for each gene based on normalised coverage in read mappings. We validated this score by comparison of highly conserved Benchmarking Universal Single Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) to all other genes. The average scores of BUSCOs were significantly lower than the scores of non-BUSCOs. Analysis of variation demonstrated lower variation values between replicates of a single accession than between iteratively, randomly selected accessions from the whole dataset Ath-966. Functional investigations revealed defense and antimicrobial response genes among the genes with high-dispensability scores. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of classifying a gene as core or dispensable, QUOD assigns a dispensability score to each gene. Hence, QUOD facilitates the identification of candidate dispensable genes, associated with high dispensability scores, which often underlie lineage-specific adaptation to varying environmental conditions.
BACKGROUND: Dispensability of genes in a phylogenetic lineage, e.g. a species, genus, or higher-level clade, is gaining relevance as most genome sequencing projects move to a pangenome level. Most analyses classify genes as core genes, which are present in all investigated individual genomes, and dispensable genes, which only occur in a single or a few investigated genomes. The binary classification as 'core' or 'dispensable' is often based on arbitrary cutoffs of presence/absence in the analysed genomes. Even when extended to 'conditionally dispensable', this concept still requires the assignment of genes to distinct groups. RESULTS: Here, we present a new method which overcomes this distinct classification by quantifying gene dispensability and present a dedicated tool for reference-based QUantification Of gene Dispensability (QUOD). As a proof of concept, sequence data of 966 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions (Ath-966) were processed to calculate a gene-specific dispensability score for each gene based on normalised coverage in read mappings. We validated this score by comparison of highly conserved Benchmarking Universal Single Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) to all other genes. The average scores of BUSCOs were significantly lower than the scores of non-BUSCOs. Analysis of variation demonstrated lower variation values between replicates of a single accession than between iteratively, randomly selected accessions from the whole dataset Ath-966. Functional investigations revealed defense and antimicrobial response genes among the genes with high-dispensability scores. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of classifying a gene as core or dispensable, QUOD assigns a dispensability score to each gene. Hence, QUOD facilitates the identification of candidate dispensable genes, associated with high dispensability scores, which often underlie lineage-specific adaptation to varying environmental conditions.
Authors: Ruth A Swanson-Wagner; Steven R Eichten; Sunita Kumari; Peter Tiffin; Joshua C Stein; Doreen Ware; Nathan M Springer Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Hervé Tettelin; Vega Masignani; Michael J Cieslewicz; Claudio Donati; Duccio Medini; Naomi L Ward; Samuel V Angiuoli; Jonathan Crabtree; Amanda L Jones; A Scott Durkin; Robert T Deboy; Tanja M Davidsen; Marirosa Mora; Maria Scarselli; Immaculada Margarit y Ros; Jeremy D Peterson; Christopher R Hauser; Jaideep P Sundaram; William C Nelson; Ramana Madupu; Lauren M Brinkac; Robert J Dodson; Mary J Rosovitz; Steven A Sullivan; Sean C Daugherty; Daniel H Haft; Jeremy Selengut; Michelle L Gwinn; Liwei Zhou; Nikhat Zafar; Hoda Khouri; Diana Radune; George Dimitrov; Kisha Watkins; Kevin J B O'Connor; Shannon Smith; Teresa R Utterback; Owen White; Craig E Rubens; Guido Grandi; Lawrence C Madoff; Dennis L Kasper; John L Telford; Michael R Wessels; Rino Rappuoli; Claire M Fraser Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephen W Scherer; Charles Lee; Ewan Birney; David M Altshuler; Evan E Eichler; Nigel P Carter; Matthew E Hurles; Lars Feuk Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Fei Lu; Maria C Romay; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Peter J Bradbury; Robert J Elshire; Tianyu Wang; Yu Li; Yongxiang Li; Kassa Semagn; Xuecai Zhang; Alvaro G Hernandez; Mark A Mikel; Ilya Soifer; Omer Barad; Edward S Buckler Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Sean P Gordon; Bruno Contreras-Moreira; Daniel P Woods; David L Des Marais; Diane Burgess; Shengqiang Shu; Christoph Stritt; Anne C Roulin; Wendy Schackwitz; Ludmila Tyler; Joel Martin; Anna Lipzen; Niklas Dochy; Jeremy Phillips; Kerrie Barry; Koen Geuten; Hikmet Budak; Thomas E Juenger; Richard Amasino; Ana L Caicedo; David Goodstein; Patrick Davidson; Luis A J Mur; Melania Figueroa; Michael Freeling; Pilar Catalan; John P Vogel Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Nathan M Springer; Kai Ying; Yan Fu; Tieming Ji; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Yi Jia; Wei Wu; Todd Richmond; Jacob Kitzman; Heidi Rosenbaum; A Leonardo Iniguez; W Brad Barbazuk; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Daniel Nettleton; Patrick S Schnable Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2009-11-20 Impact factor: 5.917