Literature DB >> 33563241

Effect of treatment center volume on outcomes in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients.

Kiwoon Baeg1, Cynthia Harris2, Monica S Naparst1, Eugene Ahn1, Sahityasri Thapi1, Jacob Martin3, Sheila Rustgi1, Grace Mhango4, Juan Wisnivesky4, Michelle Kang Kim5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical centers with varying levels of expertise treat gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), which are relatively rare tumors. This study assesses the impact of center volume on GEP-NET treatment outcomes.
METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry linked to Medicare claims data. The data includes patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2010 who had no health maintenance organization (HMO) coverage, participated in Medicare parts A and B, were older than 65 at diagnosis, had tumor differentiation information, and had no secondary cancer. We identified medical centers at which patients received GEP-NET treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues, or radiation therapy) using Medicare claims data. Center volume was divided into 3 tiers - low, medium, and high - based on the number of unique GEP-NET patients treated by a medical center over 2 years. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression to assess the association between volume and disease-specific survival.
RESULTS: We identified 899 GEP-NET patients, of whom 37, 45, and 18% received treatment at low, medium volume, and high-volume centers, respectively. Median disease-specific survival for patients at low and medium tiers were 1.4 years and 5.3 years, respectively, but was not reached for patients at high volume centers. Results showed that patients treated at high volume centers had better survival than those treated in low volume centers (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9), but showed no difference in outcomes between medium and high-volume centers.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that for these increasingly common tumors, referral to a tertiary care center may be indicated. Physicians caring for GEP-NET patients should consider early referral to high volume centers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinoid tumors; Center volume; Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; SEER Medicare; Volume study

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33563241      PMCID: PMC7871611          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07868-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  16 in total

1.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Gastroduodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  G Delle Fave; D O'Toole; A Sundin; B Taal; P Ferolla; J K Ramage; D Ferone; T Ito; W Weber; Z Zheng-Pei; W W De Herder; A Pascher; P Ruszniewski
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.914

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  D Schrag; L D Cramer; P B Bach; A M Cohen; J L Warren; C B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  K E Öberg
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Pamela L Kunz; Diane Reidy-Lagunes; Lowell B Anthony; Erin M Bertino; Kari Brendtro; Jennifer A Chan; Herbert Chen; Robert T Jensen; Michelle Kang Kim; David S Klimstra; Matthew H Kulke; Eric H Liu; David C Metz; Alexandria T Phan; Rebecca S Sippel; Jonathan R Strosberg; James C Yao
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States.

Authors:  Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 8.  Rare cancers: Challenges & issues.

Authors:  Raveendran K Pillai; K Jayasree
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Irvin M Modlin; Kjell Oberg; Daniel C Chung; Robert T Jensen; Wouter W de Herder; Rajesh V Thakker; Martyn Caplin; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Greg A Kaltsas; Eric P Krenning; Steven F Moss; Ola Nilsson; Guido Rindi; Ramon Salazar; Philippe Ruszniewski; Anders Sundin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 10.  Current treatment strategies for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

Authors:  Inbal Uri; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
Journal:  Clin Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2018-07-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Management of neuroendocrine neoplasms: conformity with guidelines in and outside a center of excellence.

Authors:  Carole Morin; Keo-Morakort Benedetto; Agathe Deville; Laurent Milot; Aurélie Theillaumas; Valérie Hervieu; Mathieu Pioche; Gilles Poncet; Julien Forestier; Laurent François; Francoise Borson-Chazot; Mustapha Adham; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Thomas Walter
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.221

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.