Literature DB >> 33562898

Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD) rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones.

.   

Abstract

The predominant source of human exposure to radio frequency radiation (RFR) occurs through usage of cellular phone handsets. The Food and Drug Administration nominated cell phone RFR emission for toxicology and carcinogenicity testing in 1999. At that time, animal experiments were deemed crucial because meaningful human exposure health data from epidemiological studies were not available. Male and female Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD) rats were exposed to time-averaged whole-body specific absorption rates of Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM)- or Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA)-modulated cell phone RFR at 900 MHz in utero, during lactation, and after weaning for 28 days or 2 years. Genetic toxicology studies were conducted in rat peripheral blood erythrocytes and leukocytes, brain cells, and liver cells. (Abstract Abridged). This is a work of the US government and distributed under the terms of the Public Domain.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 33562898      PMCID: PMC8039879          DOI: 10.22427/NTP-TR-595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser        ISSN: 0888-8051


  14 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the physiological and health-related effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from wireless communication devices on children and adolescents in experimental and epidemiological human studies.

Authors:  Lambert Bodewein; Dagmar Dechent; David Graefrath; Thomas Kraus; Tobias Krause; Sarah Driessen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Cellular Telephone Use and the Risk of Brain Tumors: Update of the UK Million Women Study.

Authors:  Joachim Schüz; Kirstin Pirie; Gillian K Reeves; Sarah Floud; Valerie Beral
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Methodology of Studying Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation on Organisms: Technical Aspects.

Authors:  Katerina Bartosova; Marek Neruda; Lukas Vojtech
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Andreas Karabarbounis; Igor Yakymenko; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Molecular Mechanism of Malignant Transformation of Balb/c-3T3 Cells Induced by Long-Term Exposure to 1800 MHz Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation (RF-EMR).

Authors:  Zhen Ding; Xiaoyong Xiang; Jintao Li; Shuicai Wu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 6.  Health Council of the Netherlands and evaluation of the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication and cancer risks.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24

7.  Development of health-based exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices using a benchmark dose approach.

Authors:  Uloma Igara Uche; Olga V Naidenko
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Microwave radiation induces neuronal autophagy through miR-30a-5p/AMPKα2 signal pathway.

Authors:  Yanhui Hao; Wenchao Li; Hui Wang; Jing Zhang; Haoyu Wang; Ji Dong; Binwei Yao; Xinping Xu; Li Zhao; Ruiyun Peng
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.976

9.  Reply to Comment on Choi, Y.-J., et al. Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8079.

Authors:  Seung-Kwon Myung; Joel M Moskowitz; Yoon-Jung Choi; Yun-Chul Hong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  The Critical Importance of Molecular Biomarkers and Imaging in the Study of Electrohypersensitivity. A Scientific Consensus International Report.

Authors:  Dominique Belpomme; George L Carlo; Philippe Irigaray; David O Carpenter; Lennart Hardell; Michael Kundi; Igor Belyaev; Magda Havas; Franz Adlkofer; Gunnar Heuser; Anthony B Miller; Daniela Caccamo; Chiara De Luca; Lebrecht von Klitzing; Martin L Pall; Priyanka Bandara; Yael Stein; Cindy Sage; Morando Soffritti; Devra Davis; Joel M Moskowitz; S M J Mortazavi; Martha R Herbert; Hanns Moshammer; Gerard Ledoigt; Robert Turner; Anthony Tweedale; Pilar Muñoz-Calero; Iris Udasin; Tarmo Koppel; Ernesto Burgio; André Vander Vorst
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.