Literature DB >> 33562726

Biomarkers of Response to Etoposide-Platinum Chemotherapy in Patients with Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Caroline Lacombe1,2, Ophélie De Rycke1,2, Anne Couvelard2,3, Anthony Turpin4, Aurélie Cazes3, Olivia Hentic1, Valérie Gounant5, Gérard Zalcman5, Philippe Ruszniewski1,2, Jérôme Cros2,3, Louis de Mestier1,2.   

Abstract

Etoposide-platinum (EP) chemotherapy has long been the reference treatment for grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 NEN). However, G3 NEN are heterogeneous, including well-differentiated tumors (NET) and poorly differentiated large (LCNEC) or small (SCNEC) cell carcinomas, whose response to EP chemotherapy varies considerably. Our aim was to evaluate predictive biomarkers for the response to EP chemotherapy in G3 NEN. We retrospectively studied 89 patients with lung (42%) and digestive (58%) G3 NEN treated by EP chemotherapy between 2006 and 2020. All cases were centrally reviewed for cytomorphology/Ki-67 and immunohistochemistry of retinoblastoma protein (Rb)/p53/p16, analyzed using a semi-quantitative score. The absence of Rb staining (Rbinap) or the absence of very intense p53 staining (p53inap) were considered inappropriate. Rb staining was also studied as a quantitative marker, the best threshold being determined by ROC curve. Intense p16 staining (p16high) also suggested cell cycle dysregulation. Our primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). We included 10 G3 NET, 31 LCNEC and 48 SCNEC, which showed ORR of 20%, 32% and 75%, respectively (NET vs. NEC, p = 0.040; LCNEC vs. SCNEC, p < 0.001). The ORR was significantly higher in NEN presenting with Rbinap (63% vs. 42%, p = 0.025) and p16high (66% vs. 35%, p = 0.006). Rb < 150 optimally identified responders (AUC = 0.657, p < 0.001). The ORR was 67% in Rb < 150 (vs. 25%, p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, only Rb < 150 was independently associated with ORR (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.11-15.53, p = 0.034). We confirm the heterogeneity of the response to EP treatment in G3 NEN. Rb < 150 was the best predictive biomarker for the response to EP, and p53 immunostaining had no additional value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; chemotherapy; neuroendocrine neoplasms; tumor response

Year:  2021        PMID: 33562726      PMCID: PMC7915900          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  38 in total

Review 1.  Carboplatin- or cisplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: the COCIS meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  Antonio Rossi; Massimo Di Maio; Paolo Chiodini; Robin Michael Rudd; Hiroaki Okamoto; Dimosthenis Vasilios Skarlos; Martin Früh; Wendi Qian; Tomohide Tamura; Epaminondas Samantas; Taro Shibata; Francesco Perrone; Ciro Gallo; Cesare Gridelli; Olga Martelli; Siow-Ming Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Specific Genomic Alterations in High-Grade Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumours with Carcinoid Morphology.

Authors:  Jerôme Cros; Nathalie Théou-Anton; Valérie Gounant; Remy Nicolle; Cécile Reyes; Sarah Humez; Ségolène Hescot; Vincent Thomas de Montpréville; Serge Guyétant; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Alice Guyard; Louis de Mestier; Solenn Brosseau; Pierre Mordant; Yves Castier; David Gentien; Philippe Ruszniewski; Gérard Zalcman; Anne Couvelard; Aurélie Cazes
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.914

3.  Molecular Subtypes of Pulmonary Large-cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Predict Chemotherapy Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta; Ernst-Jan M Speel; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Jules L Derks; Noémie Leblay; Erik Thunnissen; Robert Jan van Suylen; Michael den Bakker; Harry J M Groen; Egbert F Smit; Ronald Damhuis; Esther C van den Broek; Amélie Charbrier; Matthieu Foll; James D McKay
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Rb Loss and KRAS Mutation Are Predictors of the Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm with Grade 3: A Japanese Multicenter Pancreatic NEN-G3 Study.

Authors:  Susumu Hijioka; Waki Hosoda; Keitaro Matsuo; Makoto Ueno; Masayuki Furukawa; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Masafumi Ikeda; Tetsuhide Ito; Shoji Nakamori; Hiroshi Ishii; Yuzo Kodama; Chigusa Morizane; Takuji Okusaka; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Kenji Notohara; Hiroki Taguchi; Masayuki Kitano; Kei Yane; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Yoshiaki Tsuchiya; Izumi Komoto; Hiroki Tanaka; Akihito Tsuji; Syunpei Hashigo; Yoshiaki Kawaguchi; Tetsuya Mine; Atsushi Kanno; Go Murohisa; Katsuyuki Miyabe; Tadayuki Takagi; Nobutaka Matayoshi; Tsukasa Yoshida; Kazuo Hara; Masayuki Imamura; Junji Furuse; Yasushi Yatabe; Nobumasa Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Alterations in the p16INK4a/cyclin D1/RB pathway in gastrointestinal tract endocrine tumors.

Authors:  Anna Fen-Yau Li; Alice Chia-Heng Li; Shyh-How Tsay; Wing-Yin Li; Wen-Yih Liang; Jeou-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Clinical correlation of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer genomics.

Authors:  A Dowlati; M B Lipka; K McColl; S Dabir; M Behtaj; A Kresak; A Miron; M Yang; N Sharma; P Fu; G Wildey
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  New Insights into the Molecular Characteristics of Pulmonary Carcinoids and Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, and the Impact on Their Clinical Management.

Authors:  Jules L Derks; Noémie Leblay; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Ernst-Jan M Speel; Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Divergent cyclin B1 expression and Rb/p16/cyclin D1 pathway aberrations among pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Toru Igarashi; Shi-Xu Jiang; Toru Kameya; Hisao Asamura; Yuichi Sato; Kanji Nagai; Isao Okayasu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN): French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR).

Authors:  Louis de Mestier; Come Lepage; Eric Baudin; Romain Coriat; Frédéric Courbon; Anne Couvelard; Christine Do Cao; Eric Frampas; Sébastien Gaujoux; Rodica Gincul; Pierre Goudet; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Gilles Poncet; Denis Smith; Philippe Ruszniewski; Thierry Lecomte; Olivier Bouché; Thomas Walter; Guillaume Cadiot
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 4.088

View more
  3 in total

1.  Treatment Approaches and Outcome of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Grade 3 in German Real-World Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Simone Luecke; Christian Fottner; Harald Lahner; Henning Jann; Dominik Zolnowski; Detlef Quietzsch; Patricia Grabowski; Birgit Cremer; Sebastian Maasberg; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Hans-Helge Mueller; Thomas Matthias Gress; Anja Rinke
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Therapeutic strategies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: State-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Elettra Merola; Andrea Michielan; Umberto Rozzanigo; Marco Erini; Sandro Sferrazza; Stefano Marcucci; Chiara Sartori; Chiara Trentin; Giovanni de Pretis; Franca Chierichetti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-02-27

3.  RUNDC3A regulates SNAP25-mediated chemotherapy resistance by binding AKT in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC).

Authors:  Pengchen Chen; Wei Wang; Sin Wa Wong; Junnan Li; Qiushaung Wu; Shu-Dong Zhang; Yao Lin; Hang Fai Kwok
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2022-06-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.