Literature DB >> 33562572

Machine Learning Use for Prognostic Purposes in Multiple Sclerosis.

Ruggiero Seccia1, Silvia Romano2, Marco Salvetti2,3, Andrea Crisanti4, Laura Palagi1, Francesca Grassi5.   

Abstract

The course of multiple sclerosis begins with a relapsing-remitting phase, which evolves into a secondarily progressive form over an extremely variable period, depending on many factors, each with a subtle influence. To date, no prognostic factors or risk score have been validated to predict disease course in single individuals. This is increasingly frustrating, since several treatments can prevent relapses and slow progression, even for a long time, although the possible adverse effects are relevant, in particular for the more effective drugs. An early prediction of disease course would allow differentiation of the treatment based on the expected aggressiveness of the disease, reserving high-impact therapies for patients at greater risk. To increase prognostic capacity, approaches based on machine learning (ML) algorithms are being attempted, given the failure of other approaches. Here we review recent studies that have used clinical data, alone or with other types of data, to derive prognostic models. Several algorithms that have been used and compared are described. Although no study has proposed a clinically usable model, knowledge is building up and in the future strong tools are likely to emerge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease progression; machine learning; multiple sclerosis; prognostication

Year:  2021        PMID: 33562572      PMCID: PMC7914671          DOI: 10.3390/life11020122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-1729


  60 in total

1.  AI added to the curriculum for doctors-to-be.

Authors:  Monique Brouillette
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Bertalan Meskó; Marton Görög
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-09-24

3.  Machine Learning EEG to Predict Cognitive Functioning and Processing Speed Over a 2-Year Period in Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Controls.

Authors:  Hanni Kiiski; Lee Jollans; Seán Ó Donnchadha; Hugh Nolan; Róisín Lonergan; Siobhán Kelly; Marie Claire O'Brien; Katie Kinsella; Jessica Bramham; Teresa Burke; Michael Hutchinson; Niall Tubridy; Richard B Reilly; Robert Whelan
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Applications of machine learning to diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Monika A Myszczynska; Poojitha N Ojamies; Alix M B Lacoste; Daniel Neil; Amir Saffari; Richard Mead; Guillaume M Hautbergue; Joanna D Holbrook; Laura Ferraiuolo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Development of a Sensitive Outcome for Economical Drug Screening for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Treatment.

Authors:  Peter Kosa; Danish Ghazali; Makoto Tanigawa; Chris Barbour; Irene Cortese; William Kelley; Blake Snyder; Joan Ohayon; Kaylan Fenton; Tanya Lehky; Tianxia Wu; Mark Greenwood; Govind Nair; Bibiana Bielekova
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  Machine learning and medical education.

Authors:  Vijaya B Kolachalama; Priya S Garg
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2018-09-27

7.  Considering patient clinical history impacts performance of machine learning models in predicting course of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ruggiero Seccia; Daniele Gammelli; Fabio Dominici; Silvia Romano; Anna Chiara Landi; Marco Salvetti; Andrea Tacchella; Andrea Zaccaria; Andrea Crisanti; Francesca Grassi; Laura Palagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A systematic review of the applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  I S Stafford; M Kellermann; E Mossotto; R M Beattie; B D MacArthur; S Ennis
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-09

9.  Machine learning analysis of motor evoked potential time series to predict disability progression in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jan Yperman; Thijs Becker; Dirk Valkenborg; Veronica Popescu; Niels Hellings; Bart Van Wijmeersch; Liesbet M Peeters
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 10.  Big data, machine learning and artificial intelligence: a neurologist's guide.

Authors:  Stephen D Auger; Benjamin M Jacobs; Ruth Dobson; Charles R Marshall; Alastair J Noyce
Journal:  Pract Neurol       Date:  2020-09-29
View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction of high and low disease activity in early MS patients using multiple kernel learning identifies importance of lateral ventricle intensity.

Authors:  Claudia Chien; Moritz Seiler; Fabian Eitel; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Friedemann Paul; Kerstin Ritter
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2022-07-03

2.  Comparison of Machine Learning Methods Using Spectralis OCT for Diagnosis and Disability Progression Prognosis in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Alberto Montolío; José Cegoñino; Elena Garcia-Martin; Amaya Pérez Del Palomar
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Towards Multimodal Machine Learning Prediction of Individual Cognitive Evolution in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Stijn Denissen; Oliver Y Chén; Johan De Mey; Maarten De Vos; Jeroen Van Schependom; Diana Maria Sima; Guy Nagels
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.