Literature DB >> 33561570

Occupational differences in advance care planning: Are medical professionals more likely to plan?

Deborah Carr1, Lucie Kalousova2, Katherine Lin3, Sarah Burgard4.   

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) helps ensure that treatment preferences are met at the end of life. Medical professionals typically are responsible for facilitating patients' ACP, and may be especially effective in doing so if they have first-hand insights from their own planning. However, no large-scale U.S. studies examine whether persons working on the front lines of health care are more likely than other workers to have done ACP. We contrast the use of three ACP components (living wills, durable power of attorney for health care, and informal discussions) among persons working in medical, legal, social/health support services, other professional, and other non-professional occupations. Data are from the Health and Retirement Study (n = 7668) and Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (n = 5464). Multivariable logistic regression analyses are adjusted for socioeconomic, demographic, health, and psychosocial factors that may confound associations between occupational group and ACP. Medical professionals in both samples are more likely than other professional workers to discuss their own treatment preferences, net of all controls. Medical professionals in the WLS are more likely to execute living wills and DPAHC designations, whereas legal professionals in the HRS are more likely to name a DPAHC. Non-professional workers are significantly less likely to do all three types of planning, although these differences are accounted for by socioeconomic factors. Social and health services professionals are no more likely than other professionals to do ACP. The on-the-job experiences and expertise of medical professionals may motivate them to discuss their own end-of-life preferences, which may render them more trustworthy sources of information for patients and clients. The Affordable Care Act provides reimbursement for medical professionals' end-of-life consultations with Medicare beneficiary patients, yet practitioners uncomfortable with such conversations may fail to initiate them. Programs to increase medical professionals' own ACP may have the secondary benefit of increasing ACP among their patients.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance care planning; Employment; End-of-life; Health; Occupations; Social stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33561570      PMCID: PMC7937323          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  38 in total

1.  Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others?

Authors:  Joseph J Gallo; Joseph B Straton; Michael J Klag; Lucy A Meoni; Daniel P Sulmasy; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Social Work Involvement in Advance Care Planning: Findings from a Large Survey of Social Workers in Hospice and Palliative Care Settings.

Authors:  Gary L Stein; John G Cagle; Grace H Christ
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Patient's Perspectives on the Notion of a Good Death: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alicia Krikorian; Camilo Maldonado; Tania Pastrana
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Advance Care Planning: Understanding Clinical Routines and Experiences of Interprofessional Team Members in Diverse Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Kelly Arnett; Rebecca L Sudore; David Nowels; Cindy X Feng; Cari R Levy; Hillary D Lum
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 5.  Lost in translation: the unintended consequences of advance directive law on clinical care.

Authors:  Lesley S Castillo; Brie A Williams; Sarah M Hooper; Charles P Sabatino; Lois A Weithorn; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Stability of preferences for end-of-life treatment after 3 years of follow-up: the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study.

Authors:  Marsha N Wittink; Knashawn H Morales; Lucy A Meoni; Daniel E Ford; Nae-Yuh Wang; Michael J Klag; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-27

7.  Family relationships and advance care planning: do supportive and critical relations encourage or hinder planning?

Authors:  Kathrin Boerner; Deborah Carr; Sara Moorman
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 8.  Approximately One In Three US Adults Completes Any Type Of Advance Directive For End-Of-Life Care.

Authors:  Kuldeep N Yadav; Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Saida Kent; Jennifer Kim; Nicole Herbst; Adjoa Mante; Scott D Halpern; Katherine R Courtright
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 9.  Social workers' involvement in advance care planning: a systematic narrative review.

Authors:  Chong-Wen Wang; Cecilia L W Chan; Amy Y M Chow
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Advance Care Planning Claims and Health Care Utilization Among Seriously Ill Patients Near the End of Life.

Authors:  Deepshikha Charan Ashana; Xiaoxue Chen; Abiy Agiro; Gayathri Sridhar; Ann Nguyen; John Barron; Kevin Haynes; Michael Fisch; David Debono; Scott D Halpern; Michael O Harhay
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.