Literature DB >> 3356154

Report from the panel on the Case for Registers of Clinical Trials at the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials.

K Dickersin1.   

Abstract

A plenary session at the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Society for Clinical Trials addressed "The Case for Registers of Clinical Trials." There are a number of reasons for having registers of clinical trials: to promote collaboration and communication among investigators regarding new and ongoing clinical trials, to provide a basis for methodologic research, and to facilitate meta-analysis by the availability of a system of trial identification that is independent of the published literature. The experience gleaned by those involved with two existing trial registers, the International Committee on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Registry and the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, can be used to provide insight into the issues generic to trial registration. The time perspective to be used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, the practicability of comprehensive prospective registration, and funding are central considerations for these and other registers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3356154     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90010-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  10 in total

1.  Design and implementation of a national clinical trials registry.

Authors:  A T McCray; N C Ide
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Bayesian communication: a clinically significant paradigm for electronic publication.

Authors:  H P Lehmann; S N Goodman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda.

Authors:  I Chalmers; K Dickersin; T C Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-03

4.  7th revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: good news for the transparency of clinical trials.

Authors:  Karmela Krleza-Jerić; Trudo Lemmens
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 5.  Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review.

Authors:  Natalie McGauran; Beate Wieseler; Julia Kreis; Yvonne-Beatrice Schüler; Heike Kölsch; Thomas Kaiser
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Low molecular weight heparin in prevention of perioperative thrombosis.

Authors:  A Leizorovicz; M C Haugh; F R Chapuis; M M Samama; J P Boissel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-17

7.  A probability database for decision-analytic models of coronary revascularization procedures.

Authors:  J F Murphy; K A Marrs; M G Kahn
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

8.  Characteristics and trends of clinical trials funded by the National Institutes of Health between 2005 and 2015.

Authors:  Gillian K Gresham; Stephan Ehrhardt; Jill L Meinert; Lawrence J Appel; Curtis L Meinert
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Paul Montgomery; Geraldine Macdonald; Susan Michie; Sally Hopewell; David Moher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Understanding and Evaluating Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Michael Bigby
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.494

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.