Literature DB >> 33560888

Ultrasonographic features of uterine cervical lesions.

Hyunji Oh1, Sung Bin Park1, Hyun Jeong Park1, Eun Sun Lee1, Joonho Hur1, Woosun Choi1, Byung Ihn Choi1.   

Abstract

Currently, ultrasound (US) is a valuable imaging tool for the initial assessment and evaluation of the female genital organs, uterus, and adnexa. However, it is easy to overlook the uterine cervix while conducting a pelvic US. Uterine cervical lesions may range from benign to malignant in nature. Therefore, meticulous examination with US may play a key role in assessing uterine cervical lesions. Although there is substantial overlap in the US findings across various uterine cervical lesions, some US features, in tandem with clinical characteristics, may suggest a specific diagnosis. Familiarity with the clinical settings and US characteristics of different uterine cervical lesions can support prompt and accurate diagnosis of suspicious lesions. This review article aims to describe the features of US and possible values for distinction of these lesions in the uterine cervix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33560888      PMCID: PMC8506186          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

Review 1.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Juan Luis Alcázar; Sara Arribas; José Angel Mínguez; Matías Jurado
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-08

2.  Sonographic characteristics of squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  E Epstein; A Di Legge; A Måsbäck; P G Lindqvist; P Kannisto; A C Testa
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Value of ultrasonographic evaluation for soft-tissue lesions: focus on incidentally detected lesions on CT/MRI.

Authors:  Sung Bin Park; Byeong Seong Kang
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  US of the Nongravid Cervix with Multimodality Imaging Correlation: Normal Appearance, Pathologic Conditions, and Diagnostic Pitfalls.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Benjamin L Yam; Jill E Langer; Lisa P Jones
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Is transvaginal elastography useful in pre-operative diagnosis of cervical cancer?

Authors:  Li-tao Sun; Chun-ping Ning; Yu-jie Liu; Zhen-zhen Wang; Ling-di Wang; Xian-chao Kong; Jia-wei Tian
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Real-time sonoelastography of the cervix: tissue elasticity of the normal and abnormal cervix.

Authors:  Anke Thomas; Sherko Kümmel; Ole Gemeinhardt; Thomas Fischer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Okamoto; Yumiko O Tanaka; Masato Nishida; Hajime Tsunoda; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa; Yuji Itai
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.

Authors:  A Sokalska; D Timmerman; A C Testa; C Van Holsbeke; A A Lissoni; F P G Leone; D Jurkovic; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shilpa Patel; Sidath H Liyanage; Anju Sahdev; Andrea G Rockall; Rodney H Reznek
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-09-28

Review 10.  First-trimester uterine artery Doppler analysis in the prediction of later pregnancy complications.

Authors:  Su Lynn Khong; Stefan C Kane; Shaun P Brennecke; Fabrício da Silva Costa
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.