Literature DB >> 33560709

Femoral Neck Growth and Remodeling With Free-Gliding Screw Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Kevin Morash1, Benjamin Orlik, Ron El-Hawary, Luke Gauthier, Karl Logan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) most commonly involves in situ fixation with a standard cannulated screw, leading to physeal arrest. Recently, Pega Medical (Laval, Canada) introduced the free-gliding (FG) SCFE screw, which employs a growth-friendly, telescopic design. This study examines femoral neck growth and remodeling over the first 2 postoperative years in stable SCFE treated with FG versus standard screws.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 32 hips (19 SCFE, 13 prophylactic) in 16 patients treated with FG screws for stable SCFE. We also reviewed 102 hips (63 SCFE, 19 prophylactic, 20 controls) in 55 patients treated with standard screws. Immediate postoperative radiographs were compared with 1- and 2-year follow-up images.
RESULTS: For the overall study cohort, mean age at surgery was 12.2±1.9 years, with a mean slip angle of 26.9±18.0 degrees. In FG SCFE hips, the alpha angle remodeled 12.9±19.2 degrees in the first postoperative year (P=0.018) and articulotrochanteric distance decreased by 4.2±4.6 mm at 2 years (P=0.018). In standard SCFE hips, the alpha angle remodeled 4.3±11.3 degrees at 1 year (P=0.014), while articulotrochanteric distance decreased by 4.5±3.2 mm at 2 years (P<0.001). By 2 years, FG screws lengthened more in prophylactic (4.8±3.4 mm) than SCFE hips (1.7±1.8 mm, P=0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Greater remodeling of femoral neck cam deformity occurs when treating SCFE using an FG screw. Further research is required to measure the impact of this finding on femoroacetabular impingement and degenerative arthritis. In addition, FG screws allow ongoing growth of prophylactically treated hips, while standard screws promote coxa breva. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative, therapeutic study.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33560709     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  4 in total

1.  Is there a persistent capital femoral epiphysis growth after screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Camille Sleth; François Bauzou; Claudia De Cristo; Fanny Alkar; Pauline Joly-Monrigal; Clément Jeandel; Jérôme Cottalorda; Djamel Louahem M'Sabah; Marion Delpont
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-04-09

Review 2.  Is the modified Dunn's procedure superior to in situ fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies for management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Tim Cheok; Thomas Smith; Morgan Berman; Matthew Jennings; Kanishka Williams; Pradeep Mathew Poonnoose; Jaideep Rawat; Bruce Foster
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.917

3.  Advantages of Telescopic Screw in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Treatment: A Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alexandru Ulici; Adelina Ionescu; Diana Dogaru; Olivia Hotoboc; Catalin Nahoi; Cristian Zamfir; Madalina Carp
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Leg length discrepancy after in situ fixation with screw for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Kim; Kun-Bo Park; Hyun Woo Kim; Jong Eun Kim; Hoon Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.