Literature DB >> 33560300

Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography comparison of shorty and standard Class II Carriere Motion appliance.

Brian Wilson, Nikoleta Konstantoni, Ki Beom Kim, Patrick Foley, Hiroshi Ueno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment effects of the standard and shorty Class II Carriere Motion appliances (CMAs) on adolescent patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty adolescents with Class II malocclusion formed group 1, who were treated with shorty CMA (n = 25, 12.66 ± 1.05 years), and age- and sex-matched group 2, who were treated with standard CMA (n = 25, 12.73 ± 1.07 years). Treatment effects were analyzed by tracing with Invivo software to compare pretreatment (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with post-CMA (T2) CBCT images. A total of 23 measurements were compared within and between groups.
RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, maxillary first molars showed significant distal movement from T1 to T2 (1.83 ± 2.11 mm and 2.14 ± 1.34 mm, respectively), with distal tipping and rotation in group 1 (6.52° ± 3.99° and 3.15° ± 7.52°, respectively) but only distal tipping (7.03° ± 3.45°) in group 2. Similarly, in both groups, the maxillary first premolars experienced significant distal movement with distal tipping but no significant rotation. In group 1, maxillary canines did not undergo significant distal movement. In both groups 1 and 2, mandibular first molars experienced significant mesial movement (1.85 ± 1.88 mm and 2.44 ± 2.02 mm, respectively). Group 1 showed statistically significantly less reduction in overjet and less canine distal movement with less distal tipping than group 2 (α < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The shorty CMA achieved Class II correction similarly to the standard CMA, with less change in overjet and distal tipping movement of the maxillary canines.
© 2021 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D evaluation; CBCT evaluation; Carriere Distalizer; Carriere Motion appliance; Class II; Class II malocclusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33560300     DOI: 10.2319/041320-295.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  2 in total

1.  Utilization of a 3D Printed Orthodontic Distalizer for Tooth-Borne Hybrid Treatment in Class II Unilateral Malocclusions.

Authors:  Andrej Thurzo; Wanda Urbanová; Bohuslav Novák; Iveta Waczulíková; Ivan Varga
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Anchorage control using miniscrews in comparison to Essix appliance in treatment of postpubertal patients with Class II malocclusion using Carrière Motion Appliance.

Authors:  Ahmed S Fouda; Khaled H Attia; Amr M Abouelezz; Mohamed Abd El-Ghafour; Mai H Aboulfotouh
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.