Mohamed Amine Msolli1,2, Adel Sekma1,2, Maryem Ben Marzouk1,2, Wael Chaabane3,2, Khaoula Bel Haj Ali4,5, Lotfi Boukadida3,2, Nasri Bzeouich1,2, Imen Gannoun2, Imen Trabelssi2, Kamel Laaouiti1,2, Mohamed Habib Grissa1,2, Kaouthar Beltaief1,2, Zohra Dridi6, Asma Belguith7, Mehdi Methamem8, Wahid Bouida1,2, Riadh Boukef3,2, Hamdi Boubaker1,2, Semir Nouira1,2. 1. Emergency Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia. 2. Research Laboratory LR12SP18, University of Monastir, 5019, Monastir, Tunisia. 3. Emergency Department, Sahloul University Hospital, 4011, Sousse, Tunisia. 4. Emergency Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia. belhajalikhaoula@yahoo.fr. 5. Research Laboratory LR12SP18, University of Monastir, 5019, Monastir, Tunisia. belhajalikhaoula@yahoo.fr. 6. Cardiology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia. 7. Department of Preventive Medicine, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia. 8. Emergency Department, Farhat Hached University Hospital, 4031, Sousse, Tunisia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonographic B-lines have recently emerged as a bedside imaging tool for the differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea in the Emergency Department (ED). However, despite its simplicity, LUS has not fully penetrated emergency department. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasonographic B-lines performed by emergency medicine (EM) residents for the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients admitted to ED for acute dyspnea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional prospective study conducted between January 2016 and October 2017 including patients aged over 18 years admitted to ED for acute dyspnea. At admission, two consecutive bedside LUS study were performed by a pair of EM residents who received a 2-h course for recognition of sonographic B-lines to determine independently B-lines score and B-profile pattern. All participating sonographers were blinded to patients' clinical data. B-lines score ≥ 15 or a B-profile pattern was considered as suggestive of CHF. The final leading diagnosis was assessed by two expert sonographers, who were blinded to the residents' interpretations, based on clinical findings, chest X-ray, brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac and lung ultrasound testing. Accuracy and agreement of B-lines score and B-profile pattern were calculated. RESULTS: We included 700 patients with a mean age of 68 ± 12.6 years and a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.43. The diagnosis of CHF was recorded in 371 patients (53%). The diagnostic performance of B-lines score at a cut-off 15 and B-profile pattern was, respectively, 88% and 82.5% for sensitivity, 75% and 84% for specificity, 80% and 85% for positive predictive value, 84% and 81% for negative predictive value. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 [0.83-0.89] and 0.83 [0.80-0.86], respectively, for B-lines score and B-profile pattern. There was an excellent agreement between residents for the diagnosis of CHF using both scores (kappa = 0.81 and 0.85, respectively, for ordinal scale B-lines score and B-profile pattern). CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasound B-lines assessment has a good accuracy and an excellent reproducibility in the diagnosis of CHF in the hand of EM residents following a short training program. Trial registration Name of the registry: clinicaltrials.gov; Trial registration number: NCT03717779; Date of registration: October 24, 2018 'Retrospectively registered'; URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov.
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonographic B-lines have recently emerged as a bedside imaging tool for the differential diagnosis of acute dyspnea in the Emergency Department (ED). However, despite its simplicity, LUS has not fully penetrated emergency department. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasonographic B-lines performed by emergency medicine (EM) residents for the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients admitted to ED for acute dyspnea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional prospective study conducted between January 2016 and October 2017 including patients aged over 18 years admitted to ED for acute dyspnea. At admission, two consecutive bedside LUS study were performed by a pair of EM residents who received a 2-h course for recognition of sonographic B-lines to determine independently B-lines score and B-profile pattern. All participating sonographers were blinded to patients' clinical data. B-lines score ≥ 15 or a B-profile pattern was considered as suggestive of CHF. The final leading diagnosis was assessed by two expert sonographers, who were blinded to the residents' interpretations, based on clinical findings, chest X-ray, brain natriuretic peptide, cardiac and lung ultrasound testing. Accuracy and agreement of B-lines score and B-profile pattern were calculated. RESULTS: We included 700 patients with a mean age of 68 ± 12.6 years and a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.43. The diagnosis of CHF was recorded in 371 patients (53%). The diagnostic performance of B-lines score at a cut-off 15 and B-profile pattern was, respectively, 88% and 82.5% for sensitivity, 75% and 84% for specificity, 80% and 85% for positive predictive value, 84% and 81% for negative predictive value. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 [0.83-0.89] and 0.83 [0.80-0.86], respectively, for B-lines score and B-profile pattern. There was an excellent agreement between residents for the diagnosis of CHF using both scores (kappa = 0.81 and 0.85, respectively, for ordinal scale B-lines score and B-profile pattern). CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasound B-lines assessment has a good accuracy and an excellent reproducibility in the diagnosis of CHF in the hand of EM residents following a short training program. Trial registration Name of the registry: clinicaltrials.gov; Trial registration number: NCT03717779; Date of registration: October 24, 2018 'Retrospectively registered'; URL of trial registry record: clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: Giovanni Volpicelli; Mahmoud Elbarbary; Michael Blaivas; Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gebhard Mathis; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Lawrence Melniker; Luna Gargani; Vicki E Noble; Gabriele Via; Anthony Dean; James W Tsung; Gino Soldati; Roberto Copetti; Belaid Bouhemad; Angelika Reissig; Eustachio Agricola; Jean-Jacques Rouby; Charlotte Arbelot; Andrew Liteplo; Ashot Sargsyan; Fernando Silva; Richard Hoppmann; Raoul Breitkreutz; Armin Seibel; Luca Neri; Enrico Storti; Tomislav Petrovic Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: John Gullett; John P Donnelly; Richard Sinert; Bill Hosek; Drew Fuller; Hugh Hill; Isadore Feldman; Giorgio Galetto; Martin Auster; Beatrice Hoffmann Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: A Mebazaa; H Tolppanen; C Mueller; J Lassus; S DiSomma; G Baksyte; M Cecconi; D J Choi; A Cohen Solal; M Christ; J Masip; M Arrigo; S Nouira; D Ojji; F Peacock; M Richards; N Sato; K Sliwa; J Spinar; H Thiele; M B Yilmaz; J Januzzi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Susanna Price; Elke Platz; Louise Cullen; Guido Tavazzi; Michael Christ; Martin R Cowie; Alan S Maisel; Josep Masip; Oscar Miro; John J McMurray; W Frank Peacock; F Javier Martin-Sanchez; Salvatore Di Somma; Hector Bueno; Uwe Zeymer; Christian Mueller Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 32.419