| Literature DB >> 33558809 |
A Najah1, F Y Teo2, M F Chow3, Y F Huang4, S D Latif5, S Abdullah6, M Ismail7,8, A El-Shafie9,10.
Abstract
Global concerns have been observed due to the outbreak and lockdown causal-based COVID-19, and hence, a global pandemic was announced by the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2020. The Movement Control Order (MCO) in Malaysia acts to moderate the spread of COVID-19 through the enacted measures. Furthermore, massive industrial, agricultural activities and human encroachment were significantly reduced following the MCO guidelines. In this study, first, a reconnaissance survey was carried out on the effects of MCO on the health conditions of two urban rivers (i.e., Rivers of Klang and Penang) in Malaysia. Secondly, the effect of MCO lockdown on the water quality index (WQI) of a lake (Putrajaya Lake) in Malaysia is considered in this study. Finally, four machine learning algorithms have been investigated to predict WQI and the class in Putrajaya Lake. The main observations based on the analysis showed that noticeable enhancements of varying degrees in the WQI had occurred in the two investigated rivers. With regard to Putrajaya Lake, there is a significant increase in the WQI Class I, from 24% in February 2020 to 94% during the MCO month of March 2020. For WQI prediction, Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) outperformed other models in predicting the changes in the index with a high level of accuracy. For sensitivity analysis results, it is shown that NH3-N and COD play vital rule and contributing significantly to predicting the class of WQI, followed by BOD, while the remaining three parameters (i.e. pH, DO, and TSS) exhibit a low level of importance. © Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2021.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Movement control operation; Surface water quality; Water quality index
Year: 2021 PMID: 33558809 PMCID: PMC7857098 DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03139-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran) ISSN: 1735-1472 Impact factor: 2.860
Fig. 1a Location of Klang River basin and b The stations of water quality monitoring (Rezaie-Balf et al. 2020)
Fig. 2DOE classification of water quality based on the water quality index
WQI classification (%) for the Putrajaya Lake from 2011–2019 (Adapted from (BAHAGIAN ALAM SEKITAR, TASIK DAN WETLAND PERBADANAN PUTRAJAYA. http://plwmos.ppj.gov.my/. Accessed 5 May 2020b)
| Year | Class | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | |
| 2011 | 67.0% | 33.0% | |
| 2012 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 2013 | 8.0% | 91.0% | 1.0% |
| 2014 | 6.1% | 93.9% | |
| 2015 | 12.7% | 87.3% | |
| 2016 | 14.7% | 85.3% | |
| 2017 | 12.3% | 87.7% | |
| 2018 | 4.9% | 95.1% | |
| 2019 | 15.7% | 84.3% | |
Fig. 3Water quality index for the first three months in 2020 (Adapted from (Perbadanan Putrajaya | Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/putrajaya. Accessed 15 May 2020i))
Average value of water quality parameters
| Time | pH | D.O (mg/l) | BOD (mg/l) | COD (mg/l) | TSS (mg/l) | NH3–N (mg/l) | WQI | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-Feb-20 | 7.59 | 7.78 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 0.04 | 92.2 | II |
| 25-Mar-20 | 7.60 | 7.52 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 0.00 | 94.3 | I |
| 8-Apr-20 | 7.57 | 7.69 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0.01 | 93.4 | I |
| 19-May-20 | 7.55 | 7.85 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 0.05 | 93.3 | I |
Fig. 4Measured COD during May 2019 and 2020
Fig. 5Putrajaya Lake before and after the MCO
Fig. 6a Relative error percent, b Actual and predicted best model
Fig. 7Predictor importance