Literature DB >> 33558753

COVID-19 vaccines and kidney disease.

Martin Windpessl1,2, Annette Bruchfeld3,4, Hans-Joachim Anders5, Holly Kramer6,7, Meryl Waldman8, Laurent Renia9,10, Lisa F P Ng9,10,11,12, Zhou Xing13,14,15, Andreas Kronbichler16,17.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33558753      PMCID: PMC7869766          DOI: 10.1038/s41581-021-00406-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol        ISSN: 1759-5061            Impact factor:   28.314


× No keyword cloud information.
Kidney disease substantially increases the risk of severe COVID-19. As medications to reduce COVID-19 hospitalizations and mortality largely remain elusive and are unlikely to be developed in the near future, effective and safe vaccines and continuous infection mitigation strategies are currently the only realistic options to curb the ongoing pandemic and drive down SARS-CoV-2 infections. As we move into 2021, several vaccines have either received or are about to receive emergency use authorization, with many more in development (Table 1; Supplementary Table 1).
Table 1

COVID-19 vaccine candidates currently approved or in phase III trials*

Vaccine (manufacturer)Type of immune responseEfficacyStorageNo. of dosesStatus
Killed whole virus
CoronaVac (Sinovac)IgM/IgGNA2–8 °C2Approved in countries including China, Turkey and Brazil
COVAXIN (Bharat Biotech)NAApproved in India
BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm)NAApproved in China, Bahrain and UAE
Purified virus components
NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax)IgM/IgGNA2–8 °C2Phase III trials
ZF2001 (Chinese Academy of Sciences)NAPhase III trials
Replication-defective viral vector carrying pathogen gene(s)
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca)IgM/IgGTwo full doses, 62%; one half and one full dose, 90%; overall, 70.4%[4]2–8 °C1–2Approved in UK and by the EMA
Ad5-nCOV (CanSino)IgA, cell-mediated immunityNAPhase III trials
Sputnik V (Gamaleya Research)NAApproved in countries including Russia, Belarus and Argentina
Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen)NAPhase III trials
mRNA vaccines
BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech)IgM/IgG, IgA, cell-mediated immunity95% in all age groups[2]−70 °C permanently; 2–8 °C for 5 days2Approved by the FDA and EMA and in countries including Canada and UK
mRNA-1273 (Moderna)94.1%[3]−20 °C for 6 months; 2–8 °C for 30 days2Approved by the FDA and EMA, in Canada and UK

*All of the listed candidates are suitable for people with immunodeficiency but no efficacy data are currently available for this population. EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; NA, not available; UAE, United Arab Emirates.

COVID-19 vaccine candidates currently approved or in phase III trials* *All of the listed candidates are suitable for people with immunodeficiency but no efficacy data are currently available for this population. EMA, European Medicines Agency; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; NA, not available; UAE, United Arab Emirates. Kidney disease substantially increases the risk of severe COVID-19 Given the vulnerability of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to COVID-19, major nephrology societies such as the UK Renal Association and the US National Kidney Foundation have issued statements calling for prioritization of these patients for vaccination. Whether COVID-19 vaccines confer the same high level of protection in patients with kidney disease as has been reported for participants in recent trials, who were generally healthy, is not yet known. A recently initiated phase III trial evaluating the vaccine candidate NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax) is prioritizing the enrolment of patients with underlying medical conditions, including CKD[1]. Similar trials for other vaccine candidates are needed to accrue information to guide selection of the most appropriate vaccine delivery platforms for these patients.

Choice of COVID-19 vaccine

As patients with kidney disease commonly have compromised immune systems, live replicating microbial-vectored vaccines should be avoided. However, replication-defective viral-vectored vaccines such as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) and the mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) are safe to use. The potency of approved COVID-19 vaccines in patients who are immune compromised is currently unknown, but data for established vaccines, such as those for influenza, suggest that vaccine potency in such individuals can vary substantially in terms of the titres of neutralizing antibodies that are induced and the duration of specific immunity. In phase 3 trials, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 prevented COVID-19 in 95%, 94.1% and 70.4% of participants[2-4], respectively, suggesting that the mRNA vaccines might induce protective immunity more reliably than ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Use of these vaccines might therefore be preferable for patients who are immune compromised. mRNA vaccines might induce protective immunity more reliably than ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Compared with inactivated vaccines, both mRNA vaccines and viral-vectored vaccines have the advantage of inducing balanced humoral and T cell immunity[5]. The immune correlates of vaccine-induced protection against COVID-19 are poorly defined but likely include both humoral and cellular mechanisms[6]. Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells are involved in viral clearance in many respiratory viral diseases[7] and protracted T cell immunity may reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. A potent CD8+ T cell response is usually induced by viral-vectored vaccines[4] and is expected for mRNA vaccines (Table 1). T cell immunity assays to test for adequate vaccine responses would therefore be desirable for routine practice. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, type of kidney disease and treatment regimen might also influence the protective capacity of vaccines. In patients with no or weak induction of seroconversion and/or T cell immunity after vaccination, theoretical options include an additional booster dose, administration of a different vaccine platform (e.g. prime-boost strategies) or respiratory mucosal vaccination. The latter approach, in contrast to intramuscular administration, induces strong immunological memory mediated by tissue-resident innate and adaptive immune cells that are adept at offering protection in early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mucosal vaccination might therefore be an effective vaccine strategy for patients who are immune compromised.

Patients receiving chronic dialysis

Dialysis units are particularly high-risk locations for infection with SARS-CoV-2. Seroconversion after confirmed infection approaches 100% in the dialysis population, but the durability of this immune response and the extent to which it translates into protective immunity remains unclear. Some studies indicate that SARS-CoV-2 IgG titres decline substantially by 3 months after diagnosis[8]. Thus, it is critical that as dialysis units begin to vaccinate their patients, post-vaccination antibody levels are monitored to determine optimal immunization schedules. Moreover, ongoing research should elucidate whether particular vaccines offer specific advantages for people on chronic dialysis.

Patients receiving immunosuppression

Patients with autoimmune kidney diseases on chronic immunosuppression were excluded from all major trials of COVID-19 vaccine candidates (Supplementary Table 1). Thus, no data are currently available regarding short-term and longer-term vaccine safety, immunogenicity and protective efficacy in these patients. Specific issues that impact vaccination decisions in certain subgroups of patients also need to be addressed. Timing of vaccination and vaccine readiness is relevant in this regard, particularly in patients receiving treatment with anti-CD20 therapy (e.g. rituximab), which is known to abrogate immune responses to vaccinations[9]. Decisions on whether to delay or interrupt non-urgent treatment with rituximab to find an appropriate vaccination window or to use alternative immunosuppressive therapies need to be considered in addition to weighing the potential risk of autoimmune disease relapse versus risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 if vaccination is deferred. In patients with active autoimmune disease, treating this disease should take priority and vaccination should be delayed. The immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients receiving other common immunosuppressive regimens requires further investigation. Among transplant recipients, the seroresponse to a trivalent influenza vaccination was significantly lower in those receiving mycophenolate mofetil[10]. This finding might suggest that such patients may need modification of vaccination regimens. Some COVID-19 vaccines require adjuvants to increase their immunogenicity; comparison of the seroconversion and safety of these vaccines with those that do not require adjuvants, such as replication-defective viral-vectored vaccines, will be informative. Concerns have been raised that vaccines can trigger autoimmunity but causation is difficult to prove and statistically significant associations have not been reported. Furthermore, there is currently no evidence that vaccines provoke potentially fatal disease relapses or acute rejection episodes (Supplementary Table 2). Vaccine-triggered antiviral immunity (IFNα) might theoretically provoke disease flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. However, the risk–benefit assessment for potentially fatal COVID-19 versus a treatable disease flare or rejection episode may still favour vaccination in most cases. We need to be vigilant regarding these risks and robust pharmaco-epidemiologic post-marketing studies are needed for each of the vaccine delivery systems.

Conclusions

Based on the available data for inactivated vaccines such as those against influenza, one can reasonably assume that the safety of current SARS-CoV-2 candidate vaccines does not differ between individuals in the various registration studies and the CKD population. The suitability of new COVID-19 vaccine platforms such as mRNA and viral-vectored vaccines for this heterogeneous population is unknown, but the response rates are expected to be lower than in the key studies published so far, hence, highly potent vaccines should be preferred. Another important consideration is vaccine hesitancy, which might differ by socioeconomic and demographic factors. Long-term relationships between patients and health-care providers should enable frank and balanced discussions of the benefits, risks and uncertainties regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Such discussion together with referral to reliable online resources, such as those provided by NephCure, will hopefully result in increased vaccine uptake. Dedicated prospective COVID-19 vaccine studies involving patients with advanced stages of kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients are urgently needed and are likely to emerge in the near future. Meanwhile, patients should be counselled about the importance of continuing to practise safety measures such as social distancing and using personal protective equipment. Supplementary information
  2 in total

1.  Audio Interview: A Look at Covid-19 Prevention and Care in 2020.

Authors:  Eric J Rubin; Lindsey R Baden; Stephen Morrissey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A Longitudinal, 3-Month Serologic Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in a Belgian Hemodialysis Facility.

Authors:  Laura Labriola; Anaïs Scohy; François Seghers; Quentin Perlot; Julien De Greef; Christine Desmet; Cécile Romain; Johann Morelle; Jean-Cyr Yombi; Benoît Kabamba; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos; Michel Jadoul
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 8.237

  2 in total
  35 in total

1.  Glomerular Disease in Temporal Association with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Series of 29 Cases.

Authors:  Tiffany N Caza; Clarissa A Cassol; Nidia Messias; Andrew Hannoudi; Randy S Haun; Patrick D Walker; Rebecca M May; Regan M Seipp; Elizabeth J Betchick; Hassan Amin; Mandolin S Ziadie; Michael Haderlie; Joy Eduwu-Okwuwa; Irina Vancea; Melvin Seek; Essam B Elashi; Ganesh Shenoy; Sayeed Khalillullah; Jesse A Flaxenburg; John Brandt; Matthew J Diamond; Adam Frome; Eugene H Kim; Gregory Schlessinger; Erlandas Ulozas; Janice L Weatherspoon; Ethan Thomas Hoerschgen; Steven L Fabian; Sung Yong Bae; Bilal Iqbal; Kanwalijit K Chouhan; Zeina Karam; James T Henry; Christopher P Larsen
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-09-16

2.  Humoral Response to BNT1622 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Patients with Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Delphine Kervella; Pierre Braud; Claire Garandeau; Celine Phelizot; Xavier Ambrosi; Gilles Blancho; Maryvonne Hourmant; Lucile Figueres
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in dialysis and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Chiara Cantarelli; Andrea Angeletti; Laura Perin; Luis Sanchez Russo; Gianmarco Sabiu; Manuel Alfredo Podestà; Paolo Cravedi
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2022-07-27

4.  Editorial: COVID-19 Related Kidney Disease: From Epidemiology to Clinical Management.

Authors:  Marco Fiorentino; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  Comparison of COVID-19 Inactivated Virus Vaccine Immunogenicity Between Healthy Individuals and Patients on Hemodialysis: A Single-Center Study From Pakistan.

Authors:  Sapna Bai; Murtaza Dhrolia; Hina Qureshi; Ruqaya Qureshi; Kiran Nasir; Aasim Ahmad
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-15

6.  Humoral antibody response to the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in Asian patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kuei-Ting Tung; Yu-Sen Peng; Shih-Ping Hsu; Hon-Yen Wu; Yen-Ling Chiu; Ju-Yeh Yang; Mei-Fen Pai; Kai-Hsiang Shu; Szu-Yu Pan; Hui-Ming Lu; Wan-Yu Lin; Chun-Hsing Liao; Fang-Yeh Chu; Wan-Chuan Tsai
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.543

7.  Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2-Vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Michael Jahn; Johannes Korth; Oliver Dorsch; Olympia Evdoxia Anastasiou; Burkhard Sorge-Hädicke; Bartosz Tyczynski; Anja Gäckler; Oliver Witzke; Ulf Dittmer; Sebastian Dolff; Benjamin Wilde; Andreas Kribben
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Review of Early Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Among Patients With CKD.

Authors:  Edward J Carr; Andreas Kronbichler; Matthew Graham-Brown; Graham Abra; Christos Argyropoulos; Lorraine Harper; Edgar V Lerma; Rita S Suri; Joel Topf; Michelle Willicombe; Swapnil Hiremath
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  Humoral and cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in renal transplant versus dialysis patients: A prospective, multicenter observational study using mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.

Authors:  Julian Stumpf; Torsten Siepmann; Tom Lindner; Claudia Karger; Jörg Schwöbel; Leona Anders; Robert Faulhaber-Walter; Jens Schewe; Heike Martin; Holger Schirutschke; Kerstin Barnett; Jan Hüther; Petra Müller; Torsten Langer; Thilo Pluntke; Kirsten Anding-Rost; Frank Meistring; Thomas Stehr; Annegret Pietzonka; Katja Escher; Simon Cerny; Hansjörg Rothe; Frank Pistrosch; Harald Seidel; Alexander Paliege; Joachim Beige; Ingolf Bast; Anne Steglich; Florian Gembardt; Friederike Kessel; Hannah Kröger; Patrick Arndt; Jan Sradnick; Kerstin Frank; Anna Klimova; René Mauer; Xina Grählert; Moritz Anft; Arturo Blazquez-Navarro; Timm H Westhoff; Ulrik Stervbo; Torsten Tonn; Nina Babel; Christian Hugo
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-07-23

10.  Humoral and Cellular Responses to mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Administered to Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  José Jesús Broseta; Diana Rodríguez-Espinosa; Néstor Rodríguez; María Del Mar Mosquera; María Ángeles Marcos; Natalia Egri; Mariona Pascal; Erica Soruco; José Luis Bedini; Beatriu Bayés; Francisco Maduell
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 8.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.