Literature DB >> 33558537

Carbon dioxide utilization in concrete curing or mixing might not produce a net climate benefit.

Dwarakanath Ravikumar1,2, Duo Zhang3, Gregory Keoleian4, Shelie Miller4, Volker Sick5, Victor Li3.   

Abstract

Carbon capture and utilization for concrete production (CCU concrete) is estimated to sequester 0.1 to 1.4 gigatons of carbon dioxide (CO2) by 2050. However, existing estimates do not account for the CO2 impact from the capture, transport and utilization of CO2, change in compressive strength in CCU concrete and uncertainty and variability in CCU concrete production processes. By accounting for these factors, we determine the net CO2 benefit when CCU concrete produced from CO2 curing and mixing substitutes for conventional concrete. The results demonstrate a higher likelihood of the net CO2 benefit of CCU concrete being negative i.e. there is a net increase in CO2 in 56 to 68 of 99 published experimental datasets depending on the CO2 source. Ensuring an increase in compressive strength from CO2 curing and mixing and decreasing the electricity used in CO2 curing are promising strategies to increase the net CO2 benefit from CCU concrete.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33558537     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21148-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  5 in total

1.  A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  S Cucurachi; E Borgonovo; R Heijungs
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Selecting CO2 Sources for CO2 Utilization by Environmental-Merit-Order Curves.

Authors:  Niklas von der Assen; Leonard J Müller; Annette Steingrube; Philip Voll; André Bardow
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Novel Method of Sensitivity Analysis Improves the Prioritization of Research in Anticipatory Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Dwarakanath Ravikumar; Thomas P Seager; Stefano Cucurachi; Valentina Prado; Christopher Mutel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation with Humidity Swing Direct Air Capture of CO2 versus MEA-Based Postcombustion Capture.

Authors:  Coen van der Giesen; Christoph J Meinrenken; René Kleijn; Benjamin Sprecher; Klaus S Lackner; Gert Jan Kramer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal.

Authors:  Cameron Hepburn; Ella Adlen; John Beddington; Emily A Carter; Sabine Fuss; Niall Mac Dowell; Jan C Minx; Pete Smith; Charlotte K Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Macroscopic and Microscopic Properties of Cement Paste with Carbon Dioxide Curing.

Authors:  Jing Zhu; Zijian Qu; Siqi Liang; Baiping Li; Tao Du; Hui Wang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.