Literature DB >> 33558409

Binder use obscures traumatic pelvic injury in a 29-year-old man.

K T Matthew Seah1, James W MacKay2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33558409      PMCID: PMC7954544          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.201114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
A 29-year-old male motorcyclist was brought to a trauma centre after colliding with a highway barrier. The prehospital team had applied a pelvic binder, given the patient’s hemodynamic instability. The patient’s heart rate before admission to hospital was 144 beats/min, respiratory rate was 28 breaths/min and blood pressure was 100/65 mm Hg. In the emergency department, the patient was alert and reported lower abdominal discomfort. On examination, his abdomen was soft and he had bilateral open lower-limb fractures with suspected vascular injury. A trauma computed tomography (CT) scan showed no intra-abdominal injury or pelvic fracture, but did show a pelvic hematoma with no signs of active bleeding (Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.201114/tab-related-content). The patient was hemodynamically stable after initial resuscitation and the pelvic binder was removed. A routine pelvic radiograph taken after removal of the binder (in keeping with local guidelines) showed diastasis of the pubic symphysis and an injury to the left sacroiliac joint (Figure 1A). A retrospective review of the CT imaging while the binder was still in place showed some signs that may have indicated a more serious injury than initially suspected, such as the pelvic hematoma, a small avulsion fracture at the pubic symphysis (Figure 1B) and a subtle widening of the left sacroiliac joint on the initial CT imaging (Figure 1C).1
Figure 1:

(A) Axial computed tomography (CT) scan (bone windows) at the level of the pubic symphysis of a 29-year-old man, showing an apparently congruent pubic symphysis (white arrowhead) and the applied pelvic binder ( yellow arrowhead). Note tiny osseous flake in pubic symphysis joint space (white arrow), likely an avulsion injury (not detected at original radiologic read). (B) Axial CT (bone windows) at the level of the sacroiliac joints showing congruent joints with no fracture. In retrospect, perhaps the left sacroiliac joint (white arrowhead) is slightly wider than the right (yellow arrowhead), but this is extremely subtle. (C) Anteroposterior radiograph obtained after the removal of the pelvic binder, showing diastasis of the pubic symphysis (white arrowhead) and subtle widening of the left sacroiliac joint (white arrow). Note urinary bladder (asterisk) filled with iodinated contrast medium after trauma CT and displaced to the right by the pelvic hematoma seen at CT (Appendix 1).

(A) Axial computed tomography (CT) scan (bone windows) at the level of the pubic symphysis of a 29-year-old man, showing an apparently congruent pubic symphysis (white arrowhead) and the applied pelvic binder ( yellow arrowhead). Note tiny osseous flake in pubic symphysis joint space (white arrow), likely an avulsion injury (not detected at original radiologic read). (B) Axial CT (bone windows) at the level of the sacroiliac joints showing congruent joints with no fracture. In retrospect, perhaps the left sacroiliac joint (white arrowhead) is slightly wider than the right (yellow arrowhead), but this is extremely subtle. (C) Anteroposterior radiograph obtained after the removal of the pelvic binder, showing diastasis of the pubic symphysis (white arrowhead) and subtle widening of the left sacroiliac joint (white arrow). Note urinary bladder (asterisk) filled with iodinated contrast medium after trauma CT and displaced to the right by the pelvic hematoma seen at CT (Appendix 1). Local pre-hospital guidelines state that a binder should be applied if there is suspicion of a pelvic injury after blunt high-energy trauma with hemodynamic instability (or systolic blood pressure < 110 mm Hg).2 Serious pelvic injuries may be missed in the presence of a well-applied pelvic binder,3 which is particularly true for purely ligamentous anteroposterior compression injuries. Trauma centres should also have a clear protocol for binder removal.4 This case reminds practitioners that a well-applied pelvic binder can sometimes mask ligamentous injuries in open-book pelvic fractures, and a plain radiograph of the pelvis should always be obtained after removing the binder in trauma patients.
  3 in total

Review 1.  The prehospital management of pelvic fractures: initial consensus statement.

Authors:  I Scott; K Porter; C Laird; I Greaves; M Bloch
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  The Concealment of Significant Pelvic Injuries on Computed Tomography Evaluation by Pelvic Compression Devices.

Authors:  Jenny Clements; Richard Jeavons; Craig White; Ian McMurtry
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 1.484

3.  Can MDCT Unmask Instability in Binder-Stabilized Pelvic Ring Disruptions?

Authors:  David Dreizin; Jason Nascone; Derik L Davis; Daniel Mascarenhas; Nikki Tirada; Haoxing Chen; Uttam K Bodanapally
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.959

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Dual-Energy CT and Cinematic Rendering to Improve Assessment of Pelvic Fracture Instability.

Authors:  Theresa J Yu; Abdulai Bangura; Uttam Bodanapally; Jason Nascone; Robert O'Toole; Yuanyuan Liang; David Dreizin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 29.146

2.  Binder use and early pelvic radiographs in the management of unstable patients with blunt trauma.

Authors:  Nori L Bradley; Michael J Kim; Matthew R Menon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.