Literature DB >> 33558282

Clinical and technical factors associated with knee radiofrequency ablation outcomes: a multicenter analysis.

Yian Chen1, To-Nhu H Vu2, Vernon M Chinchilli3, Mohamed Farrag4, Alexandra R Roybal5, Albert Huh6, Zared O Cohen7, Adam B Becker8, Babak Arvanaghi9, Mrinal Agrawal4, Jacob Ogden4, Steven P Cohen10,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been a surge in interest in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the genicular nerves over the past decade, with wide variability in selection, technique and outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine factors associated with treatment outcome.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the effect of 23 demographic, clinical and technical variables on outcomes in 265 patients who underwent genicular nerve RFA for knee pain at 2 civilian and 1 military hospital. A primary outcome was designated as a > 30% decrease in average knee pain score lasting at least 3 months without cointerventions.
RESULTS: The overall rate of a positive response was 61.1% (95% CI 55.2% to 67.0%). In univariable analysis, larger electrode size (p=0.01), repeated lesions (p=0.02), having>80% pain relief during the prognostic block (p=0.02), not being on opioids (p=0.04), having no coexisting psychiatric condition (p=0.02), having a lower baseline pain score (p=0.01) and having >3 nerves targeted (p=0.02) were associated with a positive outcome. In multivariate logistic analysis, being obese (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.66 to 8.19, p=0.001), not using opioids (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.77, p=0.009), not being depressed (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.82, p=0.02), use of cooled RFA (OR 3.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 9.23, p=0.002) and performing multiple lesions at each neural target (OR 15.88, 95% CI 4.24 to 59.50, p<0.001) were associated with positive outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified multiple clinical and technical factors associated with treatment outcome, which should be considered when selecting patients for RFA treatment and in the design of clinical trials. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pain; diagnostic techniques and procedures; nerve block; pain management; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33558282     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  7 in total

1.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

Authors:  Robert W Hurley; Meredith C B Adams; Meredith Barad; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Andrea Chadwick; Timothy R Deer; Jennifer Hah; W Michael Hooten; Narayan R Kissoon; David Wonhee Lee; Zachary Mccormick; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; David A Provenzano; Byron J Schneider; Maarten van Eerd; Jan Van Zundert; Mark S Wallace; Sara M Wilson; Zirong Zhao; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis compared with intra-articular hyaluronan injections based on trial data.

Authors:  Mehul J Desai; Anthony Bentley; William A Keck
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  A retrospective study on patients with chronic knee pain treated with ultrasound-guided radiofrequency of the genicular nerves (RECORGEN trial).

Authors:  Amy Belba; Thibaut Vanneste; Sander M J Van Kuijk; Dieter Mesotten; Roel Mestrum; Koen Van Boxem; Astrid Van Lantschoot; Johan Bellemans; Marc Van de Velde; Jan Van Zundert
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Provides Prolonged Pain Relief Compared to Traditional Radiofrequency Ablation: A Real-World, Large Retrospective Clinical Comparison from a Single Practice.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural; Amela Minerali; Matthew Sanders; Matejic Matea; Simran Dua
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.832

6.  Predictive factors associated with successful response to utrasound guided genicular radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Selin Guven Kose; Halil Cihan Kose; Feyza Celikel; Omer Taylan Akkaya
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2022-10-01

7.  Is preoperative genicular radiofrequency ablation effective for reducing pain following total knee arthroplasty? A pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Puneet Mishra; David Edwards; Marc Huntoon; Christopher Sobey; Gregory Polkowski; John Corey; Kelly Louise Mishra; Andrew Shinar; Stephen Engstrom; Cassandra Palmer; Stephen Bruehl
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.564

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.