Andrew Gordon1, Marie K Krug2, Rachel Wulff2, Matthew V Elliott3, Jeremy Hogeveen4, Tyler Lesh5, Cameron Carter5, Marjorie Solomon6. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of California, Davis, Sacramento. Electronic address: gordon.andrew.j@gmail.com. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 3. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California. 4. Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 5. Imaging Research Center, Sacramento, California. 6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of California, Davis, Sacramento; Imaging Research Center, Sacramento, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether executive control (EC) deficits in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represent a failure in proactive EC (engaged and maintained before a cognitively demanding event) or in reactive EC (engaged transiently as the event occurs). We addressed this question by administering a paradigm investigating components of EC in a sample of individuals with ASD and typically developing individuals during functional magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: During functional magnetic resonance imaging, 141 participants (64 ASD, 77 typically developing) completed a rapid preparing to overcome prepotency task that required participants to respond to an arrow probe based on the color of an initially presented cue. We examined functional recruitment and connectivity in the frontoparietal task control, cingulo-opercular task control, salience, and default mode networks during cue and probe phases of the task. RESULTS: ASD participants showed evidence of behavioral EC impairment. Analyses of functional recruitment and connectivity revealed that ASD participants showed significantly greater activity during the cue in networks associated with proactive control processes, but on the less cognitively demanding trials. On the more cognitively demanding trials, cue activity was similar across groups. During the probe, connectivity between regions associated with reactive control processes was uniquely enhanced on more-demanding (relative to less-demanding) trials in individuals with ASD but not in typically developing individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that rather than arising from a specific failure to engage proactive or reactive forms of EC, the deficits in EC commonly observed in ASD may be due to reduced proactive EC and a consequent overreliance on reactive EC on more cognitively demanding tasks.
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether executive control (EC) deficits in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represent a failure in proactive EC (engaged and maintained before a cognitively demanding event) or in reactive EC (engaged transiently as the event occurs). We addressed this question by administering a paradigm investigating components of EC in a sample of individuals with ASD and typically developing individuals during functional magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: During functional magnetic resonance imaging, 141 participants (64 ASD, 77 typically developing) completed a rapid preparing to overcome prepotency task that required participants to respond to an arrow probe based on the color of an initially presented cue. We examined functional recruitment and connectivity in the frontoparietal task control, cingulo-opercular task control, salience, and default mode networks during cue and probe phases of the task. RESULTS: ASD participants showed evidence of behavioral EC impairment. Analyses of functional recruitment and connectivity revealed that ASD participants showed significantly greater activity during the cue in networks associated with proactive control processes, but on the less cognitively demanding trials. On the more cognitively demanding trials, cue activity was similar across groups. During the probe, connectivity between regions associated with reactive control processes was uniquely enhanced on more-demanding (relative to less-demanding) trials in individuals with ASD but not in typically developing individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that rather than arising from a specific failure to engage proactive or reactive forms of EC, the deficits in EC commonly observed in ASD may be due to reduced proactive EC and a consequent overreliance on reactive EC on more cognitively demanding tasks.
Authors: Nico U F Dosenbach; Damien A Fair; Francis M Miezin; Alexander L Cohen; Kristin K Wenger; Ronny A T Dosenbach; Michael D Fox; Abraham Z Snyder; Justin L Vincent; Marcus E Raichle; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marjorie Solomon; Jong H Yoon; J Daniel Ragland; Tara A Niendam; Tyler A Lesh; Wonja Fairbrother; Cameron S Carter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Valerie Bonnelle; Timothy E Ham; Robert Leech; Kirsi M Kinnunen; Mitul A Mehta; Richard J Greenwood; David J Sharp Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Keith M Shafritz; Joel D Bregman; Toshikazu Ikuta; Philip R Szeszko Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Kristen L Mackiewicz Seghete; Eric D Claus; Gregory C Burgess; Luka Ruzic; Marie T Banich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 3.240