Pasquale E Rummo1, Reece Lyerly2,3, Jennifer Rose4, Yelena Malyuta2, Eliza Dexter Cohen2, Amy Nunn5,6. 1. Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 2. Rhode Island Public Health Institute, Providence, RI, USA. 3. Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA. 5. Rhode Island Public Health Institute, Providence, RI, USA. amy_nunn@brown.edu. 6. Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. amy_nunn@brown.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Offering financial incentives promotes increases in fruit and vegetable purchases in farmers' markets and supermarkets. Yet, little is understood about whether food-insecure adults purchase more fruits and vegetables as a result of receiving financial incentives in mobile produce market settings. METHODS: In 2018-2019, Food on the Move provided a 50% discount to customers using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to purchase fruit and vegetables from 16 market locations in Rhode Island (n = 412 market occasions). We used mixed multivariable linear regression to estimate the difference in total dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP transactions and non-SNAP transactions. We also estimated the difference in out-of-pocket dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP and non-SNAP transactions, less the 50% discount. This reflects the actual amount spent on fresh fruits and vegetables purchased per visit. In both models, we controlled for the number of market sites per month, with fixed effects for quarter and year. We estimated random intercept variance for date of transaction and market site to adjust for clustering. RESULTS: In 2018-2019, the majority of market transactions (total n = 13,165) were SNAP transactions [n = 7.988 (63.0%)]. On average, customers spent $17.38 (SD = 16.69) on fruits and vegetables per transaction per month. However, customers using SNAP benefits spent significantly more on FVs per transaction per month [$22.01 (SD = 17.97)] compared to those who did not use SNAP benefits [9.81 (SD = 10.68)] (β = $10.88; 95% CI: 10.18, 11.58). Similarly, out-of-pocket dollar sales per SNAP transaction per month (i.e., less the 50% discount) were significantly higher [$11.42 (SD = 9.44)] relative to non-SNAP transactions [$9.40 (SD = 9.33)] (β = $1.85; 95% CI: 1.44, 2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives contributed to higher fruit and vegetable purchases among low-income customers who shop at mobile produce markets by making produce more affordable. Higher spending on fruits and vegetables may promote healthy diet behaviors and reduce chronic disease risk among food-insecure adults.
BACKGROUND: Offering financial incentives promotes increases in fruit and vegetable purchases in farmers' markets and supermarkets. Yet, little is understood about whether food-insecure adults purchase more fruits and vegetables as a result of receiving financial incentives in mobile produce market settings. METHODS: In 2018-2019, Food on the Move provided a 50% discount to customers using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to purchase fruit and vegetables from 16 market locations in Rhode Island (n = 412 market occasions). We used mixed multivariable linear regression to estimate the difference in total dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP transactions and non-SNAP transactions. We also estimated the difference in out-of-pocket dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP and non-SNAP transactions, less the 50% discount. This reflects the actual amount spent on fresh fruits and vegetables purchased per visit. In both models, we controlled for the number of market sites per month, with fixed effects for quarter and year. We estimated random intercept variance for date of transaction and market site to adjust for clustering. RESULTS: In 2018-2019, the majority of market transactions (total n = 13,165) were SNAP transactions [n = 7.988 (63.0%)]. On average, customers spent $17.38 (SD = 16.69) on fruits and vegetables per transaction per month. However, customers using SNAP benefits spent significantly more on FVs per transaction per month [$22.01 (SD = 17.97)] compared to those who did not use SNAP benefits [9.81 (SD = 10.68)] (β = $10.88; 95% CI: 10.18, 11.58). Similarly, out-of-pocket dollar sales per SNAP transaction per month (i.e., less the 50% discount) were significantly higher [$11.42 (SD = 9.44)] relative to non-SNAP transactions [$9.40 (SD = 9.33)] (β = $1.85; 95% CI: 1.44, 2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives contributed to higher fruit and vegetable purchases among low-income customers who shop at mobile produce markets by making produce more affordable. Higher spending on fruits and vegetables may promote healthy diet behaviors and reduce chronic disease risk among food-insecure adults.
Entities:
Keywords:
Financial incentives; Fruit and vegetable purchases; Mobile produce markets
Authors: Latetia V Moore; Kevin W Dodd; Frances E Thompson; Kirsten A Grimm; Sonia A Kim; Kelley S Scanlon Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Etienne J Phipps; Leonard E Braitman; Shana D Stites; S Brook Singletary; Samantha L Wallace; Lacy Hunt; Saul Axelrod; Karen Glanz; Nadine Uplinger Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer A Pooler; Heather Hartline-Grafton; Marydale DeBor; Rebecca L Sudore; Hilary K Seligman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-12-26 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cindy W Leung; Elena E Hoffnagle; Ana C Lindsay; Hayley E Lofink; Vanessa A Hoffman; Sophie Turrell; Walter C Willett; Susan J Blumenthal Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Kim M Gans; Patricia Markham Risica; Akilah Dulin Keita; Laura Dionne; Jennifer Mello; Kristen Cooksey Stowers; George Papandonatos; Shannon Whittaker; Gemma Gorham Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Candace R Young; Jennifer L Aquilante; Sara Solomon; Lisa Colby; Mukethe A Kawinzi; Nicky Uy; Giridhar Mallya Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Christina M Kasprzak; Anne E Lally; Julia J Schoonover; Deanna Gallicchio; Lindsey Haynes-Maslow; Leah N Vermont; Alice S Ammerman; Samina Raja; Laurene Tumiel-Berhalter; Jill N Tirabassi; Lucia A Leone Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-16 Impact factor: 4.135