Literature DB >> 33557780

Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint in old-age psychiatry inpatient units.

Marie Chieze1, Stefan Kaiser2, Delphine Courvoisier3, Samia Hurst4, Othman Sentissi2, Jérôme Fredouille5, Alexandre Wullschleger2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Coercion in psychiatry is legally tolerated as a last resort. The reduction of the use of coercion is a shared goal of hospital administrators, medical and nursing staff and representatives of patients and families but requires the identification of risk factors for coercion. These risk factors in geriatric psychiatric inpatient settings are not well known, especially regarding seclusion. Through examining the prevalence of coercion and patients' characteristics, this study aims to identify risk factors for coercion in elderly people.
METHODS: The use of coercion in the geriatric psychiatry division of Geneva University Hospital in 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. The incidence rate ratios were estimated with multivariable Poisson regressions to assess risk factors for coercion.
RESULTS: Eighty-one of 494 patients (16.4%) experienced at least one coercive measure during their stay (mainly seclusion). The risk factors for coercion were younger age, male gender, being divorced or married, cognitive disorders, high item 1 of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) score (overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated behavior) at admission, previous psychiatric hospitalizations and involuntary referrals from the emergency department. Other disorders and global HoNOS scores were not associated with the use of coercion.
CONCLUSION: Higher risks of coercion were outlined in men with cognitive disorders, agitated behaviors, and previous psychiatric hospitalizations. They differed from those observed in younger adults in terms of age, civil status, disorders, global HoNOS scores and referrals. Therefore, geriatric psychiatric populations should be specifically investigated for the development of interventions aiming coercion reduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coercion; Geriatric psychiatry; Restraint; Risk factors; Seclusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33557780      PMCID: PMC7869451          DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03095-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Psychiatry        ISSN: 1471-244X            Impact factor:   3.630


  56 in total

1.  Differences in period prevalence of the use of physical restraints in elderly inpatients of European hospitals and nursing homes.

Authors:  Oscar J de Vries; Gerard J Ligthart; Thorsten Nikolaus
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Nursing Staff Factors Contributing to Seclusion in Acute Mental Health Care - An Explorative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Paul Doedens; Jolanda M Maaskant; Corine H M Latour; Berno K G van Meijel; Maarten W J Koeter; Jitschak G Storosum; Emile Barkhof; Lieuwe de Haan
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 1.835

Review 3.  [Contributions to reduce coercion in psychiatric care].

Authors:  Alexandre Wullschleger; Juliane Mielau; Lieselotte Mahler; Angelika Vandamme; Christiane Montag
Journal:  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 0.752

4.  Geropsychiatric restraint use.

Authors:  J DeSantis; S Engberg; J Rogers
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Psychosocial Correlates of Patients Being Physically Restrained within the First 7 Days in an Acute Psychiatric Admission Ward: Retrospective Case Record Review.

Authors:  W W K Wu
Journal:  East Asian Arch Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06

6.  The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry.

Authors:  T Tannsjo
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Incidence of physical restraints on acute general medical wards.

Authors:  J D Frengley; L C Mion
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Florian Hotzy; Sonja Moetteli; Anastasia Theodoridou; Andres Ricardo Schneeberger; Erich Seifritz; Paul Hoff; Matthias Jäger
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Reducing conflict and containment rates on acute psychiatric wards: The Safewards cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Len Bowers; Karen James; Alan Quirk; Alan Simpson; Duncan Stewart; John Hodsoll
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.837

10.  Who is Subjected to Coercive Measures as a Psychiatric Inpatient? A Multi-Level Analysis.

Authors:  E Flammer; T Steinert; F Eisele; J Bergk; C Uhlmann
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2013-07-12
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.

Authors:  Marie Chieze; Christine Clavien; Stefan Kaiser; Samia Hurst
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.