Camil Ciprian Mireștean1,2, Anda Crișan1,3, Adina Mitrea3,4, Călin Buzea5,6, Roxana Irina Iancu7,8, Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu9,10. 1. Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania. 2. C.F. Clinical Hospital, 700506 Iași, Romania. 3. County Clinical Emergency Hospital Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania. 4. Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania. 5. National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, 700050 Iaşi, Romania. 6. "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu" Emergency Clinic Hospital, 700309 Iaşi, Romania. 7. Department of Oral Pathology, Gr. T. Popa, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iaşi, Romania. 8. Department of Clinical Laboratory, St. Spiridon, Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iaşi, Romania. 9. Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iaşi, Romania. 10. Regional Institute of Oncology, 700483 Iaşi, Romania.
Abstract
Locally advanced head and neck cancer is a unique challenge for cancer management in the Covid-19 situation. The negative consequences of delaying radio-chemotherapy treatment make it necessary to prioritize these patients, the continuation of radiotherapy being indicated even if SARS-CoV-2 infection is confirmed in the case of patients with moderate and mild symptoms. For an early scenario, the standard chemo-radiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique is the preferred option, because it reduces the overall treatment time. For a late scenario with limited resources, hypo-fractionated treatment, with possible omission of chemotherapy for elderly patients and for those who have comorbidities, is recommended. Concurrent chemotherapy is controversial for dose values >2.4 Gy per fraction. The implementation of hypo-fractionated regimens should be based on a careful assessment of dose-volume constraints for organs at risks (OARs), using recommendations from clinical trials or dose conversion based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) model. Induction chemotherapy is not considered the optimal solution in this situation because of the risk of immunosuppression even though in selected groups of patients TPF regimen may bring benefits. Although the MACH-NC meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancers did not demonstrate the superiority of induction chemotherapy over concurrent chemoradiotherapy, an induction regimen could be considered for cases with an increased risk of metastasis even in the case of a possible Covid-19 pandemic scenario.
Locally advanced n class="Disease">head and neck cancer is a unique challenge for n class="Disease">cancer management in the Covid-19 situation. The negative consequences of delaying radio-chemotherapy treatment make it necessary to prioritize these patients, the continuation of radiotherapy being indicated even if SARS-CoV-2 infection is confirmed in the case of patients with moderate and mild symptoms. For an early scenario, the standard chemo-radiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique is the preferred option, because it reduces the overall treatment time. For a late scenario with limited resources, hypo-fractionated treatment, with possible omission of chemotherapy for elderly patients and for those who have comorbidities, is recommended. Concurrent chemotherapy is controversial for dose values >2.4 Gy per fraction. The implementation of hypo-fractionated regimens should be based on a careful assessment of dose-volume constraints for organs at risks (OARs), using recommendations from clinical trials or dose conversion based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) model. Induction chemotherapy is not considered the optimal solution in this situation because of the risk of immunosuppression even though in selected groups of patientsTPF regimen may bring benefits. Although the MACH-NC meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancers did not demonstrate the superiority of induction chemotherapy over concurrent chemoradiotherapy, an induction regimen could be considered for cases with an increased risk of metastasis even in the case of a possible Covid-19 pandemic scenario.
Entities:
Keywords:
Covid-19; chemotherapy; head and neck cancer; non-surgical; radiotherapy
Authors: P Conti; Al Caraffa; C E Gallenga; S K Kritas; I Frydas; A Younes; P Di Emidio; G Tetè; F Pregliasco; G Ronconi Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2021 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: Peter Sminia; Foppe Oldenburger; Ben J Slotman; Christoph J Schneider; Maarten C C M Hulshof Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Gregory S Weinstein; Roger Cohen; Alexander Lin; Bert W O'Malley; John Lukens; Samuel Swisher-McClure; Rabie M Shanti; Jason G Newman; Harman S Parhar; Kendall Tasche; Robert M Brody; Ara Chalian; Steven Cannady; James N Palmer; Nithin D Adappa; Michael A Kohanski; Joshua Bauml; Charu Aggarwal; Kathleen Montone; Virginia Livolsi; Zubair W Baloch; Jalal B Jalaly; Kumarasen Cooper; Karthik Rajasekaran; Laurie Loevner; Christopher Rassekh Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Waleed Alhazzani; Ahmad Alhuraiji; Eric A Coomes; Roy F Chemaly; Meshari Almuhanna; Robert A Wolff; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Melvin L K Chua; Sebastien J Hotte; Brandon M Meyers; Tarek Elfiki; Giuseppe Curigliano; Cathy Eng; Axel Grothey; Conghua Xie Journal: Oncologist Date: 2020-04-27
Authors: Mateusz Szewczyk; Jakub Pazdrowski; Paweł Golusiński; Paweł Pazdrowski; Barbara Więckowska; Wojciech Golusiński Journal: Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Date: 2021-12-08