Literature DB >> 33557092

Local Bone Mineral Density, Subcutaneous and Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Routine Multi Detector Computed Tomography-Which Parameter Predicts Incident Vertebral Fractures Best?

Egon Burian1,2, Lioba Grundl1, Tobias Greve1,3, Daniela Junker2, Nico Sollmann1, Maximilian Löffler1, Marcus R Makowski2, Claus Zimmer1, Jan S Kirschke1, Thomas Baum1.   

Abstract

In this case-control study the value of bone mineral density (BMD) at different vertebral levels, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) to identify patients with incident osteoporotic vertebral fractures in routine multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) exams was assessed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients who underwent baseline and follow-up routine contrast-enhanced MDCT and had an incident osteoporotic vertebral fracture at follow-up were included. Seventeen age-, sex- and follow-up duration-matched controls were identified. Trabecular BMD (from Th5 to L5) as well as cross-sectional area of SAT and VAT were extracted.
RESULTS: BMD performed best to differentiate patients with an incident fracture from controls at the levels of Th5 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.781, p = 0.014), Th7 (AUC = 0.877, p = 0.001), and Th9 (AUC = 0.818, p = 0.005). Applying multivariate logistic regression BMD at Th7 level remained the only significant predictor of incident vertebral fractures (Th5-L5) with an odds ratio of 1.07 per BMD SD decrease. VAT and SAT did not show significant differences between the fracture and control group (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The local BMD measurement appears to be more suitable than standard mean BMD from L1-L3 for fracture risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMD; CT; SAT; VAT; incident vertebral fractures; osteoporosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33557092      PMCID: PMC7913817          DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  39 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Computed Tomography-Current Status and New Developments.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Insulin resistance negatively affects bone quality not quantity: the relationship between bone and adipose tissue.

Authors:  I M de Araújo; L T Parreiras-E-Silva; A L Carvalho; J Elias; C E G Salmon; F J A de Paula
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Authors:  C Beaudoin; L Moore; M Gagné; L Bessette; L G Ste-Marie; J P Brown; S Jean
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  BMI, Waist Circumference, and Risk of Incident Vertebral Fracture in Women.

Authors:  Julie M Paik; Harold N Rosen; Jeffrey N Katz; Bernard A Rosner; Eric B Rimm; Catherine M Gordon; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Assessment of paraspinal muscle characteristics, lumbar BMD, and their associations in routine multi-detector CT of patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Daniela Franz; Egon Burian; Maximilian T Löffler; Monika Probst; Alexandra Gersing; Benedikt Schwaiger; Daniela Pfeiffer; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas Baum; Isabelle Riederer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  George Ioannidis; Alexandra Papaioannou; Wilma M Hopman; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Tassos Anastassiades; Laura Pickard; Courtney C Kennedy; Jerilynn C Prior; Wojciech P Olszynski; Kenneth S Davison; David Goltzman; Lehana Thabane; Amiran Gafni; Emmanuel A Papadimitropoulos; Jacques P Brown; Robert G Josse; David A Hanley; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; L Joseph Melton; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA.

Authors:  Maximilian T Löffler; Alina Jacob; Alexander Valentinitsch; Anna Rienmüller; Claus Zimmer; Yu-Mi Ryang; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in multi-detector CT images via local classification of textures.

Authors:  A Valentinitsch; S Trebeschi; J Kaesmacher; C Lorenz; M T Löffler; C Zimmer; T Baum; J S Kirschke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Linda Karlsson; Gustav Ortsäter; Nicolas Norton; Philippe Halbout; Cyrus Cooper; Mattias Lorentzon; Eugene V McCloskey; Nicholas C Harvey; Muhamamd K Javaid; John A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  1 in total

1.  Editorial on Special Issue "Spine Imaging: Novel Image Acquisition Techniques and Analysis Tools".

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Thomas Baum
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.