Egon Burian1,2, Lioba Grundl1, Tobias Greve1,3, Daniela Junker2, Nico Sollmann1, Maximilian Löffler1, Marcus R Makowski2, Claus Zimmer1, Jan S Kirschke1, Thomas Baum1. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Abstract
In this case-control study the value of bone mineral density (BMD) at different vertebral levels, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) to identify patients with incident osteoporotic vertebral fractures in routine multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) exams was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients who underwent baseline and follow-up routine contrast-enhanced MDCT and had an incident osteoporotic vertebral fracture at follow-up were included. Seventeen age-, sex- and follow-up duration-matched controls were identified. Trabecular BMD (from Th5 to L5) as well as cross-sectional area of SAT and VAT were extracted. RESULTS: BMD performed best to differentiate patients with an incident fracture from controls at the levels of Th5 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.781, p = 0.014), Th7 (AUC = 0.877, p = 0.001), and Th9 (AUC = 0.818, p = 0.005). Applying multivariate logistic regression BMD at Th7 level remained the only significant predictor of incident vertebral fractures (Th5-L5) with an odds ratio of 1.07 per BMD SD decrease. VAT and SAT did not show significant differences between the fracture and control group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The local BMD measurement appears to be more suitable than standard mean BMD from L1-L3 for fracture risk assessment.
In this case-control study the value of bone mineral density (BMD) at different vertebral levels, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) to identify patients with incident osteoporotic vertebral fractures in routine multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) exams was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients who underwent baseline and follow-up routine contrast-enhanced MDCT and had an incident osteoporotic vertebral fracture at follow-up were included. Seventeen age-, sex- and follow-up duration-matched controls were identified. Trabecular BMD (from Th5 to L5) as well as cross-sectional area of SAT and VAT were extracted. RESULTS:BMD performed best to differentiate patients with an incident fracture from controls at the levels of Th5 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.781, p = 0.014), Th7 (AUC = 0.877, p = 0.001), and Th9 (AUC = 0.818, p = 0.005). Applying multivariate logistic regression BMD at Th7 level remained the only significant predictor of incident vertebral fractures (Th5-L5) with an odds ratio of 1.07 per BMD SD decrease. VAT and SAT did not show significant differences between the fracture and control group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The local BMD measurement appears to be more suitable than standard mean BMD from L1-L3 for fracture risk assessment.
Authors: I M de Araújo; L T Parreiras-E-Silva; A L Carvalho; J Elias; C E G Salmon; F J A de Paula Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Julie M Paik; Harold N Rosen; Jeffrey N Katz; Bernard A Rosner; Eric B Rimm; Catherine M Gordon; Gary C Curhan Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Nico Sollmann; Daniela Franz; Egon Burian; Maximilian T Löffler; Monika Probst; Alexandra Gersing; Benedikt Schwaiger; Daniela Pfeiffer; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas Baum; Isabelle Riederer Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: George Ioannidis; Alexandra Papaioannou; Wilma M Hopman; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Tassos Anastassiades; Laura Pickard; Courtney C Kennedy; Jerilynn C Prior; Wojciech P Olszynski; Kenneth S Davison; David Goltzman; Lehana Thabane; Amiran Gafni; Emmanuel A Papadimitropoulos; Jacques P Brown; Robert G Josse; David A Hanley; Jonathan D Adachi Journal: CMAJ Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: John A Kanis; Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; L Joseph Melton; Nikolai Khaltaev Journal: Bone Date: 2007-11-17 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Maximilian T Löffler; Alina Jacob; Alexander Valentinitsch; Anna Rienmüller; Claus Zimmer; Yu-Mi Ryang; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Valentinitsch; S Trebeschi; J Kaesmacher; C Lorenz; M T Löffler; C Zimmer; T Baum; J S Kirschke Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Fredrik Borgström; Linda Karlsson; Gustav Ortsäter; Nicolas Norton; Philippe Halbout; Cyrus Cooper; Mattias Lorentzon; Eugene V McCloskey; Nicholas C Harvey; Muhamamd K Javaid; John A Kanis Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 2.617