Fuyuko Sasaki1, Genko Oyama2, Satoko Sekimoto1, Maierdanjiang Nuermaimaiti1, Hirokazu Iwamuro3, Yasushi Shimo4, Atsushi Umemura3, Nobutaka Hattori5. 1. Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: g_oyama@juntendo.ac.jp. 3. Department of Research and Therapeutics for Movement Disorders, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Research and Therapeutics for Movement Disorders, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurology, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Research and Therapeutics for Movement Disorders, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Clinicians face various challenges in adjusting stimulation parameters and configurations in clinical DBS settings owing to inexperience, time constraints, and recent advances in DBS technology that have expanded the number of possible contact configurations. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a closed-loop algorithm (CLA) for the DBS-programming method using external motion sensor-based motor assessments in patients with PD. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, crossover study, we enrolled 12 patients who underwent eight-ring-contact DBS lead implantations bilaterally in the subthalamic nucleus. The DBS settings of the participants were programmed using a standard of care (SOC) and CLA method. The clinical effects of both programming methods were assessed in a randomized crossover fashion. The outcomes were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Scale part III (UPDRS-III) and sensor-based scores for baseline (medication-off/stimulation-off) and both programming methods. The number of programming steps required for each programming method was also recorded. RESULTS: The UPDRS-III scores and sensor-based scores were significantly improved by SOC and CLA settings compared to the baseline. No statistical difference was observed between SOC and CLA. The programming steps were significantly reduced in the CLA settings compared to those in the SOC. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: CLA can optimize DBS settings prospectively with similar therapeutic benefits as that of the SOC and reduce the number of programming steps. Automated optimization of DBS settings would reduce the burden of programming for both clinicians and patients.
INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Clinicians face various challenges in adjusting stimulation parameters and configurations in clinical DBS settings owing to inexperience, time constraints, and recent advances in DBS technology that have expanded the number of possible contact configurations. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a closed-loop algorithm (CLA) for the DBS-programming method using external motion sensor-based motor assessments in patients with PD. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, crossover study, we enrolled 12 patients who underwent eight-ring-contact DBS lead implantations bilaterally in the subthalamic nucleus. The DBS settings of the participants were programmed using a standard of care (SOC) and CLA method. The clinical effects of both programming methods were assessed in a randomized crossover fashion. The outcomes were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Scale part III (UPDRS-III) and sensor-based scores for baseline (medication-off/stimulation-off) and both programming methods. The number of programming steps required for each programming method was also recorded. RESULTS: The UPDRS-III scores and sensor-based scores were significantly improved by SOC and CLA settings compared to the baseline. No statistical difference was observed between SOC and CLA. The programming steps were significantly reduced in the CLA settings compared to those in the SOC. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: CLA can optimize DBS settings prospectively with similar therapeutic benefits as that of the SOC and reduce the number of programming steps. Automated optimization of DBS settings would reduce the burden of programming for both clinicians and patients.
Authors: Jana Peeters; Alexandra Boogers; Tine Van Bogaert; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Bart Nuttin; Myles Mc Laughlin Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 3.473
Authors: Vinata Vedam-Mai; Karl Deisseroth; James Giordano; Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz; Winston Chiong; Nanthia Suthana; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Jay Gill; Wayne Goodman; Nicole R Provenza; Casey H Halpern; Rajat S Shivacharan; Tricia N Cunningham; Sameer A Sheth; Nader Pouratian; Katherine W Scangos; Helen S Mayberg; Andreas Horn; Kara A Johnson; Christopher R Butson; Ro'ee Gilron; Coralie de Hemptinne; Robert Wilt; Maria Yaroshinsky; Simon Little; Philip Starr; Greg Worrell; Prasad Shirvalkar; Edward Chang; Jens Volkmann; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa; Andrea A Kühn; Luming Li; Matthew Johnson; Kevin J Otto; Robert Raike; Steve Goetz; Chengyuan Wu; Peter Silburn; Binith Cheeran; Yagna J Pathak; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Aysegul Gunduz; Joshua K Wong; Stephanie Cernera; Wei Hu; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Wissam Deeb; Addie Patterson; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Joshua K Wong; Günther Deuschl; Robin Wolke; Hagai Bergman; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa; Sameer A Sheth; Helen M Bronte-Stewart; Kevin B Wilkins; Matthew N Petrucci; Emilia Lambert; Yasmine Kehnemouyi; Philip A Starr; Simon Little; Juan Anso; Ro'ee Gilron; Lawrence Poree; Giridhar P Kalamangalam; Gregory A Worrell; Kai J Miller; Nicholas D Schiff; Christopher R Butson; Jaimie M Henderson; Jack W Judy; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Kelly D Foote; Peter A Silburn; Luming Li; Genko Oyama; Hikaru Kamo; Satoko Sekimoto; Nobutaka Hattori; James J Giordano; Diane DiEuliis; John R Shook; Darin D Doughtery; Alik S Widge; Helen S Mayberg; Jungho Cha; Kisueng Choi; Stephen Heisig; Mosadolu Obatusin; Enrico Opri; Scott B Kaufman; Prasad Shirvalkar; Christopher J Rozell; Sankaraleengam Alagapan; Robert S Raike; Hemant Bokil; David Green; Michael S Okun Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.473
Authors: Daniel Rodríguez-Martín; Joan Cabestany; Carlos Pérez-López; Marti Pie; Joan Calvet; Albert Samà; Chiara Capra; Andreu Català; Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 4.086