Literature DB >> 33556126

Performance measures of racially underrepresented Ph.D. students in biomedical sciences: The UAMS IMSD Program Outcomes.

Tremaine B Williams1, Latrina Y Prince1, Antiño R Allen2, Kristen M Sterba3, Billy R Thomas4, Robert E McGehee1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify performance measures of racially underrepresented minority (RUM) Ph.D. trainees who needed additional training initiatives to assist with completing the UAMS biomedical science degree. A sample of 37 trainees in the 10-year NIH-NIGMS funded Initiative for Maximizing Student Development (IMSD) program at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) were examined. Descriptive statistics and correlations examined process measures (GRE scores, GPAs, etc.) and outcome measures (time-to-degree, publications, post-doctoral fellowship, etc.) While differences were found, there were no statistically significant differences between how these two groups (Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Predominately White Institutions (PWIs)) of students performed over time as Ph.D. students. Graduates who scored lower on the verbal section of the GRE also had a higher final graduate school grade point average in graduates who received their undergraduate training from HBCUs. Of the graduates who received their undergraduate training from PWIs, graduates who scored lower on the quantitative section of the GRE had higher numbers of publications. These findings stimulate the need to 1) reduce reliance on the use of the GRE in admission committee decisions, 2) identify psychometrically valid indicators that tailored to assess outcome variables that are relevant to the careers of biomedical scientists, and 3) ensure the effective use of the tools in making admission decisions.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33556126      PMCID: PMC7870087          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  16 in total

1.  A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance.

Authors:  Nathan R Kuncel; Sarah A Hezlett; Deniz S Ones
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Research Workforce Diversity: The Case of Balancing National versus International Postdocs in US Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Navid Ghaffarzadegan; Joshua Hawley; Anand Desai
Journal:  Syst Res Behav Sci       Date:  2014-03

3.  Academic and Post-Graduate Performance of African American Medical Students by Category of Premed Institution: Historically Black vs. Predominantly White Institutions.

Authors:  Quinn Capers; David P Way
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2015-08

4.  Does the Graduate Record Examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists? A case study.

Authors:  R J Sternberg; W M Williams
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-06

5.  Reimagining the Pipeline: Advancing STEM Diversity, Persistence, and Success.

Authors:  Stacy-Ann A Allen-Ramdial; Andrew G Campbell
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.589

6.  Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science.

Authors:  Lesley G Campbell; Siya Mehtani; Mary E Dozier; Janice Rinehart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Limitations of the GRE in Predicting Success in Biomedical Graduate School.

Authors:  Liane Moneta-Koehler; Abigail M Brown; Kimberly A Petrie; Brent J Evans; Roger Chalkley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The GRE over the entire range of scores lacks predictive ability for PhD outcomes in the biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Linda Sealy; Christina Saunders; Jeffrey Blume; Roger Chalkley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Model for Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions That Decouples the GRE from Race, Ethnicity, and Gender.

Authors:  Marenda A Wilson; Max A Odem; Taylor Walters; Anthony L DePass; Andrew J Bean
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Addressing the challenge of diversity in the graduate ranks: good practices yield good outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy L Thompson; Andrew G Campbell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improved and Sustained Graduate Programs Diversity Outcomes: a 10-year Analysis and Summary of the Brown University IMSD Program.

Authors:  Andrew G Campbell; Nancy L Thompson; Marlina Duncan; Elizabeth O Harrington
Journal:  J STEM Educ Res       Date:  2021-07-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.