Literature DB >> 33556123

SafeNET: Initial development and validation of a real-time tool for predicting mortality risk at the time of hospital transfer to a higher level of care.

Stefanie C Altieri Dunn1, Johanna E Bellon1, Andrew Bilderback1, Jeffrey D Borrebach1, Jacob C Hodges1, Mary Kay Wisniewski1, Matthew E Harinstein2, Tamra E Minnier1, Joel B Nelson3, Daniel E Hall1,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Processes for transferring patients to higher acuity facilities lack a standardized approach to prognostication, increasing the risk for low value care that imposes significant burdens on patients and their families with unclear benefits. We sought to develop a rapid and feasible tool for predicting mortality using variables readily available at the time of hospital transfer. METHODS AND
FINDINGS: All work was carried out at a single, large, multi-hospital integrated healthcare system. We used a retrospective cohort for model development consisting of patients aged 18 years or older transferred into the healthcare system from another hospital, hospice, skilled nursing or other healthcare facility with an admission priority of direct emergency admit. The cohort was randomly divided into training and test sets to develop first a 54-variable, and then a 14-variable gradient boosting model to predict the primary outcome of all cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality and transition to comfort measures only or hospice care. For model validation, we used a prospective cohort consisting of all patients transferred to a single, tertiary care hospital from one of the 3 referring hospitals, excluding patients transferred for myocardial infarction or maternal labor and delivery. Prospective validation was performed by using a web-based tool to calculate the risk of mortality at the time of transfer. Observed outcomes were compared to predicted outcomes to assess model performance. The development cohort included 20,985 patients with 1,937 (9.2%) in-hospital mortalities, 2,884 (13.7%) 30-day mortalities, and 3,899 (18.6%) 90-day mortalities. The 14-variable gradient boosting model effectively predicted in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality (c = 0.903 [95% CI:0.891-0.916]), c = 0.877 [95% CI:0.864-0.890]), and c = 0.869 [95% CI:0.857-0.881], respectively). The tool was proven feasible and valid for bedside implementation in a prospective cohort of 679 sequentially transferred patients for whom the bedside nurse calculated a SafeNET score at the time of transfer, taking only 4-5 minutes per patient with discrimination consistent with the development sample for in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality (c = 0.836 [95%CI: 0.751-0.921], 0.815 [95% CI: 0.730-0.900], and 0.794 [95% CI: 0.725-0.864], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The SafeNET algorithm is feasible and valid for real-time, bedside mortality risk prediction at the time of hospital transfer. Work is ongoing to build pathways triggered by this score that direct needed resources to the patients at greatest risk of poor outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33556123      PMCID: PMC7870086          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  34 in total

1.  Interhospital Facility Transfers in the United States: A Nationwide Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sheryl Davies; Kathryn McDonald; N Ewen Wang
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  The impact of interhospital transfers on surgical quality metrics for academic medical centers.

Authors:  Cristina J Crippen; Steven J Hughes; Sugong Chen; Kevin E Behrns
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Predicting In-Hospital and 1-Year Mortality in Geriatric Trauma Patients Using Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score.

Authors:  Rebecka Ahl; Herb A Phelan; Sinan Dogan; Yang Cao; Allyson C Cook; Shahin Mohseni
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Quick SOFA Scores Predict Mortality in Adult Emergency Department Patients With and Without Suspected Infection.

Authors:  Adam J Singer; Jennifer Ng; Henry C Thode; Rory Spiegel; Scott Weingart
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Jane C Weeks; Alexi A Wright; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical admissions. An observational, population-based single-centre study.

Authors:  R W Duckitt; R Buxton-Thomas; J Walker; E Cheek; V Bewick; R Venn; L G Forni
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Utility of a single early warning score in patients with sepsis in the emergency department.

Authors:  Alasdair R Corfield; Fiona Lees; Ian Zealley; Gordon Houston; Sarah Dickie; Kirsty Ward; Crawford McGuffie
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  NATIONAL INCIDENCE OF MEDICAL TRANSFER: PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS AND REGIONAL VARIATION.

Authors:  Andrew P Reimer; Nicholas Schiltz; Siran M Koroukian; Elizabeth A Madigan
Journal:  J Health Hum Serv Adm       Date:  2016

Review 10.  Prognostic scoring systems for mortality in intensive care units--the APACHE model.

Authors:  Grzegorz Niewiński; Małgorzata Starczewska; Andrzej Kański
Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.