Maureen Beederman1, Jennifer Jaffe2, Kristine Kuchta3, Jeremy Warner4. 1. From the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL. 2. Department of Surgery. 3. Center for Biomedical Research Informatics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL. 4. Warner Aesthetic & Reconstructive Institute, Winnetka, IL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Forehead flaps are one of the workhorse flaps for nasal reconstruction, especially for large defects involving the nasal tip, ala, or multiple nasal subunits. Forehead flaps are often performed on older patients who have accompanying comorbidities and who may be at higher risk for anesthetic complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the safety and success of forehead flap nasal reconstruction in 2 different clinical settings: those performed under local anesthesia in an office-based procedure room, compared with those performed in the operating room under either general anesthesia or intravenous sedation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent forehead flap reconstruction between the years of 2011 and 2018 by the senior author. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Patients were followed for 1 year postoperatively or until the end of the study period. Patients were excluded if they had an accompanying unrelated cosmetic procedures performed during first-stage forehead flap reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 96 forehead flaps were performed, 35 of which (36.5%) were done in an office-based procedure room using local anesthesia only. Patient ages ranged from 45 to 92 years, with an average age of 71.9 years. The majority of flaps (n = 81, 85.3%) were divided at the second-stage procedure. There was no statistically significant difference in time elapsed between first- and second-stage procedures between groups (procedure room: 22.6 days; operating room: 23.8 days). There were 13 total postoperative complications (13.5%), but there was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between groups (office-based: 3 complications, 8.6%; operating room: 10 complications, 16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that forehead flap reconstruction can be done safely with acceptable postoperative results when performed under local anesthesia in an office-based outpatient setting.
BACKGROUND: Forehead flaps are one of the workhorse flaps for nasal reconstruction, especially for large defects involving the nasal tip, ala, or multiple nasal subunits. Forehead flaps are often performed on older patients who have accompanying comorbidities and who may be at higher risk for anesthetic complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the safety and success of forehead flap nasal reconstruction in 2 different clinical settings: those performed under local anesthesia in an office-based procedure room, compared with those performed in the operating room under either general anesthesia or intravenous sedation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent forehead flap reconstruction between the years of 2011 and 2018 by the senior author. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Patients were followed for 1 year postoperatively or until the end of the study period. Patients were excluded if they had an accompanying unrelated cosmetic procedures performed during first-stage forehead flap reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 96 forehead flaps were performed, 35 of which (36.5%) were done in an office-based procedure room using local anesthesia only. Patient ages ranged from 45 to 92 years, with an average age of 71.9 years. The majority of flaps (n = 81, 85.3%) were divided at the second-stage procedure. There was no statistically significant difference in time elapsed between first- and second-stage procedures between groups (procedure room: 22.6 days; operating room: 23.8 days). There were 13 total postoperative complications (13.5%), but there was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between groups (office-based: 3 complications, 8.6%; operating room: 10 complications, 16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that forehead flap reconstruction can be done safely with acceptable postoperative results when performed under local anesthesia in an office-based outpatient setting.