Ya-Hsin Yu1, Larisa Kushnir2, Meetu Kohli2, Bekir Karabucak2. 1. Department of Endodontics, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, 240 South 40th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. yayu@upenn.edu. 2. Department of Endodontics, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, 240 South 40th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This prospective clinical study compares postoperative pain after single-visit, non-surgical root canal treatment of teeth with irreversible pulpitis using two different root canal filling techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All cases were treated by endodontic residents with a standardized protocol (minimum apical size 35) and filled with one of the two techniques: warm vertical compaction technique (WVT) with gutta percha and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer, Dentsply Maillefer, York, PA, USA) or sealer-based filling technique (SBT) with single cone gutta percha and calcium silicate-based sealer (EndoSequence BC Sealer, Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA). Surveys were given to participating patients to record pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) at 4, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Statistical significance was set at 0.05 level. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four surveys were distributed over eighteen months. Ninety-two patients returned the survey (41 WVT and 51 SBT), of which 38% were asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis cases. The NRS values reduced over time for both techniques. No statistical difference was found between the two groups at the three time points assessed (p > 0.05). Postoperative pain was related to age, gender, presence of preoperative pain, and sealer extrusion (p < 0.05), however not related to preoperative periapical symptoms (percussion/palpation), dental arch, root type, and experience of the provider (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of postoperative pain for the two obturation techniques was equivalent at evaluated time points. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The obturation technique does not influence postoperative pain. After endodontic treatment of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis teeth, the pain subsides in 48 h regardless of the technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04462731.
OBJECTIVE: This prospective clinical study compares postoperative pain after single-visit, non-surgical root canal treatment of teeth with irreversible pulpitis using two different root canal filling techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All cases were treated by endodontic residents with a standardized protocol (minimum apical size 35) and filled with one of the two techniques: warm vertical compaction technique (WVT) with gutta percha and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer, Dentsply Maillefer, York, PA, USA) or sealer-based filling technique (SBT) with single cone gutta percha and calcium silicate-based sealer (EndoSequence BC Sealer, Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA). Surveys were given to participating patients to record pain intensity on a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) at 4, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Statistical significance was set at 0.05 level. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four surveys were distributed over eighteen months. Ninety-two patients returned the survey (41 WVT and 51 SBT), of which 38% were asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis cases. The NRS values reduced over time for both techniques. No statistical difference was found between the two groups at the three time points assessed (p > 0.05). Postoperative pain was related to age, gender, presence of preoperative pain, and sealer extrusion (p < 0.05), however not related to preoperative periapical symptoms (percussion/palpation), dental arch, root type, and experience of the provider (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of postoperative pain for the two obturation techniques was equivalent at evaluated time points. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The obturation technique does not influence postoperative pain. After endodontic treatment of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis teeth, the pain subsides in 48 h regardless of the technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04462731.
Authors: Elizabeth A Chybowski; Gerald N Glickman; Yogesh Patel; Alex Fleury; Eric Solomon; Jianing He Journal: J Endod Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 4.171