Literature DB >> 33555366

Classification and prognostic factors of residual symptoms after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis: a 5-year follow-up cohort study.

Hiromitsu Toyoda1, Kentaro Yamada2, Hidetomi Terai3, Masatoshi Hoshino3, Akinobu Suzuki3, Shinji Takahashi3, Koji Tamai3, Shoichiro Ohyama3, Yusuke Hori3, Akito Yabu3, Hamidullah Salimi3, Hiroaki Nakamura3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Residual symptoms indicating incomplete remission of lower leg numbness or low back pain may occur after spine surgery. The purpose was to elucidate the pattern of residual symptoms 5 years after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery using a cluster analysis.
METHODS: The study comprised 193 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (108 men, 85 women) ranging in age from 40 to 86 years (mean, 67.9 years). Each patient underwent 5-year follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale scores for low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness at 5 years were entered into the cluster analysis to characterize postoperative residual symptoms. Other clinical data were analyzed to detect the factors significantly related to each cluster.
RESULTS: The analysis yielded four clusters representing different patterns of residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 1 (57.0%) were substantially improved and had few residual symptoms of LSS. Patients in cluster 2 (11.4%) were poorly improved and had major residual symptoms. Patients in cluster 3 (17.6%) were greatly improved but had mild residual low back pain. Patients in cluster 4 (14.0%) were improved but had severe residual leg numbness. Prognostic factors of cluster 2 were a short maximum walking distance, motor weakness, resting lower leg numbness, cofounding scoliosis, and high sagittal vertical axis.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify specific patterns of residual symptoms of LSS after decompression surgery. Our results will contribute to acquisition of preoperative informed consent and identification of patients with the best chance of postoperative improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-year follow-up; Cluster analysis; Lumbar decompression surgery; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Residual symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33555366     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06754-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  The increasing morbidity of elective spinal stenosis surgery: is it necessary?

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Sho Dohzono; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Shinji Takahashi; Tomiya Matsumoto; Akinobu Suzuki; Hidetomi Terai; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-03-11

3.  Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Yamada; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Hashizume; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Shunji Tsutsui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of residual symptoms in lower extremities after decompression surgery on lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Hara; Hiroyuki Oka; Takashi Yamazaki; Katsushi Takeshita; Motoaki Murakami; Kazuto Hoshi; Sei Terayama; Atsushi Seichi; Kozo Nakamura; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Predictors of long-term outcome in an elderly group after laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Triantafyllos Bouras; George Stranjalis; Maria Loufardaki; Ilias Sourtzis; Lampis C Stavrinou; Damianos E Sakas
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-09

Review 6.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo C Machado; Paulo H Ferreira; Ian A Harris; Marina B Pinheiro; Bart W Koes; Maurits van Tulder; Magdalena Rzewuska; Chris G Maher; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Application of Unsupervised Clustering Methods to Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Hany Alashwal; Mohamed El Halaby; Jacob J Crouse; Areeg Abdalla; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Freyr G Sigmundsson; Xiao P Kang; Bo Jönsson; Björn Strömqvist
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Foot drop caused by lumbar degenerative disease: clinical features, prognostic factors of surgical outcome and clinical stage.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Wei Zhu; Jiangang Shi; Lianshun Jia; Guodong Shi; Yuan Wang; Ning Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.