Literature DB >> 33555130

Analysis of factors associated with discrepancies between predicted and observed liver weight in liver transplantation.

Pietro Addeo1,2, Benoit Naegel, Alfonso Terrone1, François Faitot1,2, Caroline Schaaf1, Philippe Bachellier1, Vincent Noblet2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even using predictive formulas based on anthropometrics in about 30% of subjects, liver weight (LW) cannot be predicted with a ≤20% margin of error. We aimed to identify factors associated with discrepancies between predicted and observed LW.
METHODS: In 500 consecutive liver grafts, we tested LW predictive performance using 17 formulas based on anthropometric characteristics. Hashimoto's formula (961.3 × BSA_D-404.8) was associated with the lowest mean absolute error and used to predict LW for the entire cohort. Clinical factors associated with a ≥20% margin of error were identified in a multivariable analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) of donors with similar anthropometric characteristics.
RESULTS: The total LW was underestimated with a ≥20% margin of error in 53/500 (10.6%) donors and overestimated in 62/500 (12%) donors. After PSM analysis, ages ≥ 65, (OR = 3.21; CI95% = 1.63-6.31; P = .0007), age ≤ 30 years, (OR = 2.92; CI95% = 1.15-7.40; P = .02), and elevated gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels (OR = 0.98; CI95% = 0.97-0.99; P = .006), influenced the risk of LW overestimation. Age ≥ 65 years, (OR = 5.98; CI95% = 2.28-15.6; P = .0002), intensive care unit (ICU) stay with ventilation > 7 days, (OR = 0.32; CI95% = 0.12-0.85; P = .02) and waist circumference increase (OR = 1.02; CI95% = 1.00-1.04; P = .04) were factors associated with LW underestimation.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased waist circumference, age, prolonged ICU stay with ventilation, elevated GGT were associated with an increase in the margin of error in LW prediction. These factors and anthropometric characteristics could help transplant surgeons during the donor-recipient matching process.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  anthropometrics; donor-recipient matching; large-for-size; liver transplantation; liver volume; liver weight; small-for-size

Year:  2021        PMID: 33555130     DOI: 10.1111/liv.14819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  2 in total

1.  Predicting the available space for liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients: a computed tomography-based volumetric study.

Authors:  Pietro Addeo; Benoit Naegel; Pierre De Mathelin; Chloe Paul; François Faitot; Caroline Schaaf; Alfonso Terrone; Lawrence Serfaty; Philippe Bachellier; Vincent Noblet
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Graft weight integration in the early allograft dysfunction formula improves the prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tommaso Maria Manzia; Quirino Lai; Hermien Hartog; Virginia Aijtink; Marco Pellicciaro; Roberta Angelico; Carlo Gazia; Wojciech G Polak; Massimo Rossi; Giuseppe Tisone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-03-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.