BACKGROUND: In patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF), several clinical trials have reported improved outcomes, including freedom from AF recurrence, quality of life, and survival, with catheter ablation. This article describes the treatment-related outcomes of the AF patients with heart failure enrolled in the CABANA trial (Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation). METHODS: The CABANA trial randomized 2204 patients with AF who were ≥65 years old or <65 years old with ≥1 risk factor for stroke at 126 sites to ablation with pulmonary vein isolation or drug therapy including rate or rhythm control drugs. Of these, 778 (35%) had New York Heart Association class >II at baseline and form the subject of this article. The CABANA trial's primary end point was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. RESULTS: Of the 778 patients with heart failure enrolled in CABANA, 378 were assigned to ablation and 400 to drug therapy. Ejection fraction at baseline was available for 571 patients (73.0%), and 9.3% of these had an ejection fraction <40%, whereas 11.7% had ejection fractions between 40% and 50%. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the ablation arm had a 36% relative reduction in the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.41-0.99]) and a 43% relative reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.96]) compared with drug therapy alone over a median follow-up of 48.5 months. AF recurrence was decreased with ablation (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.42-0.74]). The adjusted mean difference for the AFEQT (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life) summary score averaged over the entire 60-month follow-up was 5.0 points, favoring the ablation arm (95% CI, 2.5-7.4 points), and the MAFSI (Mayo Atrial Fibrillation-Specific Symptom Inventory) frequency score difference was -2.0 points, favoring ablation (95% CI, -2.9 to -1.2). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF enrolled in the CABANA trial who had clinically diagnosed stable heart failure at trial entry, catheter ablation produced clinically important improvements in survival, freedom from AF recurrence, and quality of life relative to drug therapy. These results, obtained in a cohort most of whom had preserved left ventricular function, require independent trial verification. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00911508; Unique identifier: NCT0091150.
BACKGROUND: In patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation (AF), several clinical trials have reported improved outcomes, including freedom from AF recurrence, quality of life, and survival, with catheter ablation. This article describes the treatment-related outcomes of the AF patients with heart failure enrolled in the CABANA trial (Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation). METHODS: The CABANA trial randomized 2204 patients with AF who were ≥65 years old or <65 years old with ≥1 risk factor for stroke at 126 sites to ablation with pulmonary vein isolation or drug therapy including rate or rhythm control drugs. Of these, 778 (35%) had New York Heart Association class >II at baseline and form the subject of this article. The CABANA trial's primary end point was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. RESULTS: Of the 778 patients with heart failure enrolled in CABANA, 378 were assigned to ablation and 400 to drug therapy. Ejection fraction at baseline was available for 571 patients (73.0%), and 9.3% of these had an ejection fraction <40%, whereas 11.7% had ejection fractions between 40% and 50%. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the ablation arm had a 36% relative reduction in the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.41-0.99]) and a 43% relative reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.96]) compared with drug therapy alone over a median follow-up of 48.5 months. AF recurrence was decreased with ablation (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.42-0.74]). The adjusted mean difference for the AFEQT (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life) summary score averaged over the entire 60-month follow-up was 5.0 points, favoring the ablation arm (95% CI, 2.5-7.4 points), and the MAFSI (Mayo Atrial Fibrillation-Specific Symptom Inventory) frequency score difference was -2.0 points, favoring ablation (95% CI, -2.9 to -1.2). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF enrolled in the CABANA trial who had clinically diagnosed stable heart failure at trial entry, catheter ablation produced clinically important improvements in survival, freedom from AF recurrence, and quality of life relative to drug therapy. These results, obtained in a cohort most of whom had preserved left ventricular function, require independent trial verification. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00911508; Unique identifier: NCT0091150.
Authors: Karl-Heinz Kuck; Béla Merkely; Ralf Zahn; Thomas Arentz; Karlheinz Seidl; Michael Schlüter; Roland Richard Tilz; Christopher Piorkowski; László Gellér; Thomas Kleemann; Gerhard Hindricks Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2019-11-25
Authors: Mohit K Turagam; Jalaj Garg; Samantha Sartori; Srinivas R Dukkipati; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Hugh Calkins; Lin Y Chen; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Karen L Furie; Paul A Heidenreich; Katherine T Murray; Julie B Shea; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: John J V McMurray; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Stefan D Anker; Angelo Auricchio; Michael Böhm; Kenneth Dickstein; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Cândida Fonseca; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Tiny Jaarsma; Lars Køber; Gregory Y H Lip; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Alexander Parkhomenko; Burkert M Pieske; Bogdan A Popescu; Per K Rønnevik; Frans H Rutten; Juerg Schwitter; Petar Seferovic; Janina Stepinska; Pedro T Trindade; Adriaan A Voors; Faiez Zannad; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ross J Hunter; Thomas J Berriman; Ihab Diab; Ravindu Kamdar; Laura Richmond; Victoria Baker; Farai Goromonzi; Vinit Sawhney; Edward Duncan; Stephen P Page; Waqas Ullah; Beth Unsworth; Jamil Mayet; Mehul Dhinoja; Mark J Earley; Simon Sporton; Richard J Schilling Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-01
Authors: John Spertus; Paul Dorian; Rosemary Bubien; Steve Lewis; Donna Godejohn; Matthew R Reynolds; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Alan P Wimmer; Anil Bhandari; Caroline Burk Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2010-12-15
Authors: Peter A Noseworthy; Bernard J Gersh; David M Kent; Jonathan P Piccini; Douglas L Packer; Nilay D Shah; Xiaoxi Yao Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-04-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Daniel B Mark; Kevin J Anstrom; Shubin Sheng; Jonathan P Piccini; Khaula N Baloch; Kristi H Monahan; Melanie R Daniels; Tristram D Bahnson; Jeanne E Poole; Yves Rosenberg; Kerry L Lee; Douglas L Packer Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David G Jones; Shouvik K Haldar; Wajid Hussain; Rakesh Sharma; Darrel P Francis; Shelley L Rahman-Haley; Theresa A McDonagh; S Richard Underwood; Vias Markides; Tom Wong Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Derek S Chew; Yanhong Li; Patricia A Cowper; Kevin J Anstrom; Jonathan P Piccini; Jeanne E Poole; Melanie R Daniels; Kristi H Monahan; Linda Davidson-Ray; Tristram D Bahnson; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Kerry L Lee; Douglas L Packer; Daniel B Mark Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Kevin L Thomas; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Adam P Silverstein; Kristi H Monahan; Tristram D Bahnson; Jeanne E Poole; Daniel B Mark; Douglas L Packer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 27.203