Literature DB >> 33554310

Prioritization and Refinement of Patient-Informed Value Elements as Attributes for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Preferences.

Julia F Slejko1, Yoon Duk Hong2, Jamie L Sullivan3, Robert M Reed4, Susan dosReis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Formative research studies can inform stated-preference instrument development to quantify the importance of various attributes of healthcare treatments. The objective of this study was to elicit from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease the prioritization of an established set of patient-informed value elements.
METHODS: Using an iterative mixed-methods study design, we engaged individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Phase 1 value element elicitation and Phase 2 language refinement. Study participants were recruited from March to July 2019. Four guided activities, administered in an online instrument, elicited individual preferences for 40 disease-agnostic value elements that were aligned with treatment, outcomes, or care process. Responses from the guided activities were summarized and then presented to a patient advocate and additional patient participants for further refinement of the value elements and the phrasing.
RESULTS: Twenty-three participants, 18 male and five female, mean age of 66 years (standard deviation = 7) were enrolled in Phase 1. Participant responses informed the selection of eight elements as the key candidates for the Phase 2 language refinement: Side Effects, New Therapeutic Option, Available Treatment, Appropriateness of Care, Predictable Healthcare Needs, Physical Activities: Endurance and Symptom Control, and Explanation of Treatment. With feedback from a patient advocate and additional patient participants, elements were refined, rephrased, or modified and this list was narrowed to six value elements (Side Effects, New Therapeutic Option, Willingness to Pay, Physical Activities, Explanation of Treatment, and Access to Care) to serve as attributes in a conceptual framework for a future quantitative stated-preference instrument.
CONCLUSIONS: This patient-engaged formative work identified patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease key attributes of value-based decision making that underpin benefit-risk trade-offs between physical endurance, treatment side effects, care access, and cost. This study illustrates an iterative process for eliciting and refining a comprehensive list of value elements, resulting in a subgroup of elements important to a specific patient population.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33554310     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00495-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  26 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of Health Economics Simulation Models of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Zafar Zafari; Stirling Bryan; Don D Sin; Tania Conte; Rahman Khakban; Mohsen Sadatsafavi
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Reporting Formative Qualitative Research to Support the Development of Quantitative Preference Study Protocols and Corresponding Survey Instruments: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers.

Authors:  Ilene L Hollin; Benjamin M Craig; Joanna Coast; Kathleen Beusterien; Caroline Vass; Rachael DiSantostefano; Holly Peay
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  International trends in COPD mortality, 1995-2017.

Authors:  Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Isabelle Soerjomataram; José Luis López-Campos; Julio Ancochea; Jan Willem Coebergh; Joan B Soriano
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations.

Authors:  Joanna Coast; Hareth Al-Janabi; Eileen J Sutton; Susan A Horrocks; A Jane Vosper; Dawn R Swancutt; Terry N Flynn
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A systematic review of how patients value COPD outcomes.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Rebecca L Morgan; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Wojtek Wiercioch; Małgorzata M Bała; Rafał R Jaeschke; Krzysztof Styczeń; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Anna Selva; Housne Ara Begum; Gian Paolo Morgano; Marcin Waligóra; Arnav Agarwal; Matthew Ventresca; Karolina Strzebońska; Mateusz T Wasylewski; Lídia Blanco-Silvente; Janna-Lina Kerth; Mengxiao Wang; Yuqing Zhang; Saiprasad Narsingam; Yutong Fei; Gordon Guyatt; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  Attribute Development Using Continuous Stakeholder Engagement to Prioritize Treatment Decisions: A Framework for Patient-Centered Research.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Wendy Camelo Castillo; Melissa Ross; Marcy Fitz-Randolph; Angela Vaughn-Lee; Beverly Butler
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016 Sep - Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods.

Authors:  Joanna Coast; Sue Horrocks
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-01

8.  Patient Preference Studies During Early Drug Development: Aligning Stakeholders to Ensure Development Plans Meet Patient Needs.

Authors:  Nigel S Cook; Julie Cave; Anke-Peggy Holtorf
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 9.  Patient preferences in severe COPD and asthma: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Basil G Bereza; Anders Troelsgaard Nielsen; Sverrir Valgardsson; Michiel E H Hemels; Thomas R Einarson
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-04-08

10.  Stakeholder-Engaged Derivation of Patient-Informed Value Elements.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Beverly Butler; Juan Caicedo; Annie Kennedy; Yoon Duk Hong; Chengchen Zhang; Julia F Slejko
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preferences for Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Formative Qualitative Research Using the Patient Experience.

Authors:  Susan dosReis; Laura M Bozzi; Beverly Butler; Richard Z Xie; Richard H Chapman; Jennifer Bright; Erica Malik; Julia F Slejko
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.481

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.