Literature DB >> 33554291

Development of 48-condition buffer screen for protein stability assessment.

Josef Houser1,2, Jana Kosourova3, Monika Kubickova3, Michaela Wimmerova3,4,5.   

Abstract

The determination of a suitable buffer environment for a protein of interest is not an easy task. The requirements of advanced techniques, the demands on the biological material and the researcher time needed for buffer optimization, as well as personal inflexibility, lead frequently to the use of sub-optimal buffers. Here, we demonstrate the design of a 48-condition buffer screen that can be used to determine an appropriate environment for downstream studies. By the combination of several techniques (differential scanning fluorimetry, dynamic light scattering, and bio-layer interferometry), we are able to assess the protein stability, homogeneity and binding activity across the screen with less than half a milligram of protein in 1 day. The application of this screen helps to avoid unsuitable conditions, to explain problems observed upon protein analysis and to choose the most suitable buffers for further research. The screen can be routinely used as a primary screen for buffer optimization in labs and facilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bio-layer interferometry; Buffer; Differential scanning fluorimetry; Dynamic light scattering; Protein stability; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33554291     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-021-01497-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  16 in total

1.  Quantitation of aggregates in therapeutic proteins using sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation: practical considerations that affect precision and accuracy.

Authors:  Allen Pekar; Muppalla Sukumar
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 2.  High throughput methods of assessing protein stability and aggregation.

Authors:  Guillermo A Senisterra; Patrick J Finerty
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2008-12-24

3.  Prediction of hydrodynamic and other solution properties of rigid proteins from atomic- and residue-level models.

Authors:  A Ortega; D Amorós; J García de la Torre
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Structural insights into Aspergillus fumigatus lectin specificity: AFL binding sites are functionally non-equivalent.

Authors:  Josef Houser; Jan Komarek; Gianluca Cioci; Annabelle Varrot; Anne Imberty; Michaela Wimmerova
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Dynamic light-scattering study on polymerization process of muscle actin.

Authors:  J Masai; S Ishiwata; S Fujime
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1986-12-31       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 6.  Guidelines to reach high-quality purified recombinant proteins.

Authors:  Carla Oliveira; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Buffers for enzymes.

Authors:  J S Blanchard
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Protein-ligand interactions investigated by thermal shift assays (TSA) and dual polarization interferometry (DPI).

Authors:  Morten K Grøftehauge; Nelly R Hajizadeh; Marcus J Swann; Ehmke Pohl
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 9.  The impact of protein characterization in structural proteomics.

Authors:  Arie Geerlof; J Brown; B Coutard; M P Egloff; F J Enguita; M J Fogg; R J C Gilbert; M R Groves; A Haouz; J E Nettleship; P Nordlund; R J Owens; M Ruff; S Sainsbury; D I Svergun; Matthias Wilmanns
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2006-09-19

10.  A soluble fucose-specific lectin from Aspergillus fumigatus conidia--structure, specificity and possible role in fungal pathogenicity.

Authors:  Josef Houser; Jan Komarek; Nikola Kostlanova; Gianluca Cioci; Annabelle Varrot; Sheena C Kerr; Martina Lahmann; Viviane Balloy; John V Fahy; Michel Chignard; Anne Imberty; Michaela Wimmerova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.