Literature DB >> 33554200

Effect of Distal Masseter to Facial Nerve Transfer in Paralytic Patients with Preserved Facial Nerve Continuity on Improving Scaled Measurement of Improvement in Lip Excursion (SMILE): A Vectoral Analysis.

Berke Özücer1, Osman Halit Çam1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Distal masseter-to-facial neurorrhaphy is an option to improve smile excursion in facial paralysis patients in the early period without truncating the facial nerve truncus and by ensuring the continuity of the facial nerve. This study aimed to study the effect of distal masseter-to-facial neurorrhaphy on smile excursion.
METHODS: Charts of eight patients were retrospectively examined. Screenshots showing the best possible smiles were taken from preoperative videos. Screenshots were taken from postoperative videos showing the best combination of a natural smile on the healthy side and a smile with clenched teeth on the paralytic side. Emotrics and Photoshop software were used for computing vertical, horizontal, and overall excursion from facial landmarks. Scaled measurements of improvement in lip excursion and lip angle was evaluated. Symmetry was evaluated by accepting the healthy side as 100 percent, and the paralytic side was calculated as a percentage of the healthy side.
RESULTS: Five patients had total facial paralysis and three had facial paresis. Mean postoperative follow-up period was 15.0±10.2 months. The average interval between facial denervation and nerve repair was 14.0±4.1 months (range, 11-23). All neurorrhaphies were coapted end-to-end to either the zygomatic or the buccal branch without an interposition graft. Mean postoperative initial movement occurred at 95.5±20.5 days (range, 72-138). Paralytic side to healthy side horizontal excursion changed from preoperative 72.5±17.4% to postoperative 93.4±6.9%. Vertical excursion changed from preoperative 38.4±24.6% to postoperative 89.3±11.8%. Overall excursion changed from preoperative 68.4±19.6% to postoperative 92.9±10.4%. Paralytic side to healthy side mean lip angle changed from 64.7% preoperative to 95.2% postoperatively. All changes were statistically significant (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Facial paralysis patients with an asymmetric smile benefit from distal masseter-to-facial nerve transfer and it improves smile excursion dramatically. This effect was especially prominent in the vertical component of the smiling vector. © Copyright 2020 by Official Journal of the Turkish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial paralysis; facial palsy; facial paresis; facial reanimation; masseter nerve; smile excursion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33554200      PMCID: PMC7846303          DOI: 10.5152/tao.2020.5823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 2667-7466


  23 in total

1.  Assessing outcomes in facial reanimation: evaluation and validation of the SMILE system for measuring lip excursion during smiling.

Authors:  Dominic Bray; Douglas K Henstrom; Mack L Cheney; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

2.  Pre-operative masseter muscle EMG activation during smile predicts synchronicity of smile development in facial palsy patients undergoing reanimation with the masseter nerve: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yvonne Lenz; Jurij Kiefer; Franziska Dietrich; G Björn Stark; Steffen U Eisenhardt
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Use of the masseteric nerve to treat segmental midface paresis.

Authors:  Federico Biglioli; Mahmoud Soliman; Mohamed El-Shazly; Wael Saadeldeen; Essam A Abda; Fabiana Allevi; Dimitri Rabbiosi; Filippo Tarabbia; Alessandro Lozza; Silvia Cupello; Antonino Privitera; G Dell'Aversana Orabona; L Califano
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  A Machine Learning Approach for Automated Facial Measurements in Facial Palsy.

Authors:  Diego L Guarin; Joseph Dusseldorp; Tessa A Hadlock; Nate Jowett
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Facial reanimation using the masseter-to-facial nerve transfer.

Authors:  Michael J A Klebuc
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Facial motion analysis with a video and computer system after treatment of acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  Christopher J Linstrom; Carol A Silverman; Douglas Colson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Functional upgrading of partially recovered facial palsy by cross-face nerve grafting with distal end-to-side neurorrhaphy.

Authors:  Manfred Frey; Pietro Giovanoli; Maria Michaelidou
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A comparative retrospective study: hypoglossofacial versus masseterofacial nerve anastomosis using Sunnybrook facial grading system.

Authors:  Nasser M Altamami; Sandra Zaouche; Delphine Vertu-Ciolino
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Early Nerve Grafting for Facial Paralysis After Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection With Preserved Facial Nerve Continuity.

Authors:  Monirah Albathi; Sam Oyer; Lisa E Ishii; Patrick Byrne; Masaru Ishii; Kofi O Boahene
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  Use of Objective Metrics in Dynamic Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter C Revenaugh; Ryan M Smith; Max A Plitt; Lisa Ishii; Kofi Boahene; Patrick J Byrne
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.