Literature DB >> 33553925

Phage-Display-Derived Peptide Specific to Carbamylated Protein.

Yuhao Ma1, Meng Wu2, Shuhui Li2, Marcello Tonelli3, Larry D Unsworth1,2.   

Abstract

Protein carbamylation has been linked with diseases commonly associated with patients with reduced kidney function. Carbamylated human serum albumin (cHSA), which has been proven to be nephrotoxic and associated with heart failure for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, was chosen for our study. Through phage display against cHSA, one specific peptide sequence (cH2-p1) was identified with higher selectivity toward cHSA over native HSA. The cH2-p1 peptide was synthesized, and its target binding was analyzed through isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The result showed that cH2-p1 was able to bind cHSA of different levels of carbamylation with a similar dissociation constant of ∼1.0 × 10-4 M. This peptide also showed a binding specificity to carbamylated fibrinogen (cFgn), while not binding to native Fgn at all. For better understanding of the binding mechanism of cH2-p1, competitive binding of cH2-p1 and anti-homocitrulline to cHSA was performed, and the result revealed that cH2-p1 may bind to homocitrulline residues in a similar manner to the antibody. A molecular docking study was further performed to investigate the favored binding conformation of homocitrulline residue to cH2-p1. This work demonstrates the potential of peptides as a specific binding element to carbamylated proteins.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33553925      PMCID: PMC7860060          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Carbamylation is a protein post-translational modification that usually arises during the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The buildup of urea in the blood of CKD patients leads to an increase in its decomposition product, isocyanic acid, which reacts with the lysine ε-amino group and turns lysine residues into homocitrulline during the process of carbamylation. As a result, the nature[1−4] and function[5−9] of proteins are significantly altered and have been associated with numerous health concerns such as atherosclerosis,[10] cataracts,[11] arthritis,[12] and Alzheimer’s disease.[13] Carbamylation of human serum albumin (HSA) has been reported to show enhanced nephrotoxicity with an increased possibility of tubular cell damage and peritubular fibrosis.[14] In addition, it was found that carbamylated albumin was strongly associated with cardiovascular mortality and sudden cardiac death; the role of carbamylation in the pathophysiology process has been suggested.[15] Clearance of carbamylated proteins has long been a problem using membrane-based dialysis treatments as they cannot be differentiated from normal proteins based solely upon size differences. Accumulation of carbamylated (cHSA) in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis seems to be inevitable.[16] A specific strategy has to be developed to enable selective removal of carbamylated proteins, viz., albumin, so as to enhance patient outcomes. Previous work has shown that it is possible to target homocitrulline-containing proteins. Specifically, the presence of an anti-homocitrulline-containing protein antibody has been found in the autoantibody system for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.[17] Also, inoculating animals with peptides or proteins containing homocitrulline produces antibodies against these carbamylated proteins. For instance, polyclonal antibodies against carbamylated low-density lipoprotein (cLDL) were produced by immunizing guinea pig[18] and rabbits[19] with cLDL. The anti-cLDL antibody produced from rabbit showed low cross-reactivity toward native LDL or other LDL isoforms. Likewise, in another study rabbits immunized with carbamylated HSA produced serum that has equally strong, off-target, binding to homocitrulline-containing collagen telopeptides as serum generated from carbamylated type I collagen immunization.[20] From western blotting of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies for fetal calf serum with carbamylation, carbamylated albumin was found with the most intense band.[21] All of these findings indicate that antibodies that target carbamylated proteins are in fact specific toward the homocitrulline-containing species, regardless of the protein it is found in. That said, it has been found that antibodies formed against homocitrulline do have some cross-reactivity against citrulline moieties which are formed through a whole different mechanism than homocitrulline.[22] For the application of removing carbamylated proteins from uremic patients, this citrulline cross-reactivity would actually allow for their removal from the blood compartment as well perhaps mitigating unwanted effects. Despite the fact that antibodies against carbamylated albumin have been identified from anti-sera,[20,23] there are several issues with their widespread application. Namely, none of the amino acid sequences for antibodies against homocitrulline-containing proteins has been reported, to the best of our knowledge. The large scale production of antibodies is a significant barrier to their application, having low yields, with limited repeatability.[24] In comparison, phage display techniques allow for antibody-like peptide generation with an easier procedure and a larger scale of production.[25] To date, there has been no phage display-derived peptide identified for carbamylated protein, despite their recognized potential in selective protein removal.[26] In this study, we have identified such peptide ligands that are possible for isolation of carbamylated HSA without binding native HSA.

Results and Discussion

In Vitro Carbamylation

To mimic the physiological condition, the extent of carbamylation should be similar to that contained in uremic patients. However, the problem is that in uremic patients the carbamylated and uncarbamylated albumins are always present; making it hard to distinguish the precise extent of carbamylation present for albumin. One study has determined that the proportion of highly carbamylated HSA, at Lys-549, within the blood varied from 0.1 to 3%.[27] This implies that only a small fraction of HSA was carbamylated to any extent, even if multiple lysine residues were affected. Mapping of carbamylation sites through fragmentation and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) studies identified up to two lysine sites (Lys-549 and Lys-160) of the 59 present in HSA to be significantly more susceptible to carbamylation. Hence, we may roughly estimate the real carbamylation extent, or Hcit%, from 1.7% (1/59) to 3.4% (2/59). In vitro carbamylated HSA was prepared as a model carbamylation target. Homocitrulline level was used as a measure for the degree of carbamylation and was varied from 0.54% (cHSA-1) to 3.7% (cHSA-3) (Table ). The purity of cHSA and cFgn was verified through ABA assay, and the 0 absorbance at 310 nm proved the absence of residual cyanate. To verify the in vitro stability over carbamylation, an sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) study was performed. For both cHSA and cFgn used in this study, their bands remained unchanged compared to their native protein (see Supporting Information Figure S1). This is not surprising as cyanate only binds to a small fraction of lysine side chains, producing a negligible change in molecular weight, nor will it cleave the peptide bond. It has been reported that the Stoke’s radius for BSA increased slightly upon carbamylating.[3] Here, in our study, it was confirmed by dynamic light scattering, where a hydrodynamic diameter of native HSA increased from 9.4 to 12.6 nm for cHSA-1, and remained without further change for cHSA-2 (see Supporting Information Figure S2). This might indicate that the protein size is only sensitive to change at a very slight degree of carbamylation.
Table 1

cHSA and cFgn Prepared through In Vitro Carbamylation

sampleHcit% (%)ζ-potential (mV)
HSA0–7.46 ± 0.65
cHSA-10.54 ± 0.22–7.84 ± 0.59
cHSA-22.7 ± 0.18–10.8 ± 0.44
cHSA-33.7 ± 0.17–11.7 ± 0.75
Fgn0 
cFgn12.0 ± 1.2 

Identification of Candidate Phage Clones that Bind to cHSA

The Ph.D.-12 library was used to select peptides that specifically bind cHSA. The 12 mer random library gives a complexity of 109 variant clones and allows for more complicated folding structure than 7 mer library. We found no antibody sequence recorded in IMGT databases for homocitrulline-containing species.[28,29] However, there were 31 sequences listed, with the acc. number from AJ430734 to AJ430772, for antibodies against citrulline-containing peptide.[30] It is worth noting that one commercial antibody, considered citrulline-specific, has been found to be able to recognize both homocitrulline- and citrulline-containing albumins.[20,31] Moreover, given that each of three complementarity-determining regions (CDR) are 7–15 amino acids, a 12 mer peptide is a reasonable choice to develop analogues to these CDRs. The importance of negative biopanning to remove peptides from the library that have any affinity toward native HSA cannot be overstated as it has already been shown that disulfide-constrained cyclic peptide phage display libraries derived from M13mp18 have been used to develop peptides that specifically bind HSA.[32] Therefore, we reduced the phage library used for cHSA targeting through exposing the native library to HSA coated 96-well plate surfaces (twice repeated). Biopanning against cHSA-1 yielded only one sequence (APPHVSSTVSWL) in all picked plagues after only one round. This sequence did not match any TUP record stored in the SAROTUP database; however, it could be that this sequence has a high propagation bias due to its similarity to APWHLSSQYSRT, which is a notoriously high propagation rate peptide.[33−35] PHD7FASTER prediction revealed that it has a 0.96 probability to have a propagation advantage. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results for these phage isolates (cH1-p1) failed to exhibit significantly higher absorbance on cHSA-1 compared to HSA (Figure ). Thus, we speculate that cHSA-1 may have lacked sufficient chemical features distinct from HSA and therefore no other peptides bound cHSA-1 after negative screening.
Figure 1

Affinity of candidate phages obtained through the phage display biopanning targeting cHSA to native HSA and carbamylated HSA (cHSA-1) (data represent mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD), n = 3; *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.001).

Affinity of candidate phages obtained through the phage display biopanning targeting cHSA to native HSA and carbamylated HSA (cHSA-1) (data represent mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD), n = 3; *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.001). To increase the specificity for targeting carbamylated HSA, a higher Hcit% HSA was used for phage display (cHSA-2). After four rounds of biopanning, a number of sequences with high variability were obtained (see Supporting Information Figure S3). Although it is expected that with repeated biopanning and amplification, clone variation should be reduced and a consensus sequence be resolved, this was not the case; after four rounds, new sequences were still observed. Sequence alignment did not yield any highly conserved motifs (see Supporting Information Section S3). Incorporating additional rounds of biopanning may not have helped in reducing the number of binding phages, as it may cause a selection bias toward phage that has a growing advantage. Nevertheless, there were several clones that appeared more frequently than others, and the top 6 clones were picked together with cH1-p1 (Table ). The amino acid population was ranked according to their occurrence frequency for all clone sequences for cHSA-2 binding peptides (see Supporting Information Table S1). We found serine, alanine, proline, leucine, and threonine are the most abundant amino acids observed in these systems, and they are all constitutes in both cH1-p1 and cH2-p1. Also negatively charged amino acids aspartate and glutamate are far less than positively charged amino acids lysine, histidine, and arginine.
Table 2

Lists of Candidate Peptide Sequences Obtained through the Phage Display Biopanning Targeting cHSA

sequencefrequency (%)apIbtargetlabelreference
GSAARTISPSLL11.99.75cHSA-2cH2-p1(47)
FNHKHNFTDSAH6.07.02cHSA-2cH2-p2this work
WPARTSAPFTNS6.09.75cHSA-2cH2-p3this work
AHPHSDKLVPPR3.68.8cHSA-2cH2-p4(47)
TPTIAIAQYNKW2.48.26cHSA-2cH2-p5this work
TLGLRPVPVATT1.29.41cHSA-2cH2-p6(47, 48)
APPHVSSTVSWL1006.79cHSA-1cH1-p1this work

The frequency was the percentage of the sequences appeared in sequencing data from all rounds of biopanning, with the sum of 36 and 61 sequences for biopanning against cHSA-1 and cHSA-2, respectively.

The isoelectric point (pI) value of peptide was given by ProtParam tool for protein analysis.[39]

The frequency was the percentage of the sequences appeared in sequencing data from all rounds of biopanning, with the sum of 36 and 61 sequences for biopanning against cHSA-1 and cHSA-2, respectively. The isoelectric point (pI) value of peptide was given by ProtParam tool for protein analysis.[39] An ELISA assay was performed for all peptide candidates for cHSA-1, cHSA-2, and native HSA (control). In cHSA-1, ELISA assays of all phages were shown to have similar binding to cHSA-1, despite they have almost no sequence similarities (Figure ). Among them, cH2-p1, cH2-p3, cH2-p4, cH2-p5, and cH2-p6 had significantly lower binding to HSA. In cHSA-2 ELISA (Figure ), all phages were shown to be cHSA-2-specific, with the absorbance difference between HSA and cHSA more significant than in cHSA-1 ELISA. Besides, cH2-p1 was also found to be with a higher binding affinity to cFgn compared to native Fgn as control (Figure ).
Figure 2

Affinity of candidate phages obtained through the phage display biopanning targeting cHSA to native HSA, carbamylated HSA (cHSA-2), Fgn, and carbamylated Fgn (cFgn) (data represent mean ± 1 SD, n = 3; *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.001).

Affinity of candidate phages obtained through the phage display biopanning targeting cHSA to native HSA, carbamylated HSA (cHSA-2), Fgn, and carbamylated Fgn (cFgn) (data represent mean ± 1 SD, n = 3; *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.001).

Identification of Peptide Specific to cHSA through Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)

ELISA results revealed that cH2-p1, cH2-p3, cH2-p4, cH2-p5, and cH2-p6 had specificity for cHSA-1 and cHSA-2. To further characterize their binding, and to minimize peptide–peptide interactions as opposed to peptide–protein interactions, the water-soluble peptides (cH2-p1, cH2-p4, and cH2-p6) were synthesized for ITC experiments. cH2-p3 and cH2-p5 were excluded as they would be marginally soluble within the aqueous solution. ITC analysis of binding between cH2-p1, cH2-p4, cH2-p6, and cHSA or HSA yielded Kd values between 10–5 and 10–3 M (Figures , Figure , and Figure ). Previous work using disulfide-constrained cyclic peptide phage display libraries against HSA showed Kd values of 10–6–10–5 M (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS, pH 6.2), where Kd increased dramatically at pH values of 7.4 and 9.4.[32] In our work, we did not find any peptide binding to HSA/cHSA with Kd less than 10–5 M, possibly because negative panning against HSA removed high-HSA-affinity clones. The downward ITC titration peaks suggest that the binding process is exothermic. The ITC data followed the dimensionless parameter c = [M]0/Kd, where c ∼ 1. In cases like these, only Kd can be determined with a high degree of certainty, while the stoichiometry (n) and binding enthalpy (ΔH) are considered uncertain and are therefore not reported.[36,37] For cH2-p1, the interaction with HSA was too weak to produce an obvious titration curve (Figure a). Despite the fact it was possible to obtain a Kd value of 1.0 × 10–3 M for cH2-p1 binding to HSA, the certainty of such a result is low due to a large confidence interval of ±4.98 × 10–4 M. However, cH2-p1 binding to cHSA yielded a typical low c value nonsigmoidal titration curve, and a Kd value of 9.7 × 10–5 M was obtained with a low confidence interval of ±3.1 × 10–5 M. For cH2-p4 and cH2-p6, the titration curves to both HSA and cHSA are nonsigmoidal as well, with the Kd values between 10–5 and 10–4 M. cH2-p4 gave a lower Kd for binding to HSA (4.6 × 10–5 M) than binding to cHSA (1.3 × 10–4 M), and cH2-p6 showed a similar Kd for binding to HSA (1.3 × 10–4 M) and cHSA (2.0 × 10–4 M). As the main effect of carbamylation is the positive charge elimination, for HSA with a slightly negative charge, carbamylated samples shall have a more negative surface charge (Figure a).[38] We also measured the pI value of cHSA through ζ-potential as 4.13, which was shifted from 4.83 for native HSA (Figure b). Therefore, electrostatic interaction may have an impact on the peptide binding to cHSA. The pI’s of p1, p4, and p6 were calculated (ProtParam) to be 9.75, 8.8, and 8.26, respectively,[39] indicating they are positively charged at pH 7.4. However, despite the fact that cH2-p1 has a higher pI than cH2-p4, cH2-p1 did not give a lower Kd when binding to native HSA. This indicates that the interaction between cH2-p1 and HSA/cHSA is not only affected by electrostatic interactions.
Figure 3

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into (A) native HSA and (B) cHSA-2.

Figure 4

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p4 titration into (A) native HSA and (B) cHSA-2.

Figure 5

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p6 titration into (A) native HSA and (B) cHSA-2.

Figure 6

(a) ζ-Potential and (b) isoelectric point of native HSA and carbamylated HSA.

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into (A) native HSA and (B) cHSA-2. ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p4 titration into (A) native HSA and (B) cHSA-2. ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p6 titration into (A) native HSA and (B) cHSA-2. (a) ζ-Potential and (b) isoelectric point of native HSA and carbamylated HSA. cH2-p1 seems to be the best candidate peptide for binding cHSA. cH2-p1 showed a consistently higher binding affinity for cHSA than HSA in both ITC and ELISA results. However, a similar level of binding specificity for cH2-p4 or cH2-p6 was not observed in ITC results. This may arise from the fact that the phage-displayed peptides are constrained in how they interact with cHSA as their C-terminals are coupled to the phage. Thus, synthesized peptides have one additional negative carboxylate compared to the phage-bound peptides, which may show different binding properties as a function of electrostatic properties. Moreover, ELISA results involved binding HSA/cHSA to a surface, which may have caused structural rearrangement of the protein and thus altered how the phage interacted with it compared to ITC experiments where a fraction of the protein would not be adsorbed to the walls of the test cell.

cH2-p1 Binding to cHSA with Different Hcit%

Since the interaction between cH2-p1 and cHSA was shown to be specific, it is interesting to know if affinity is affected by the extent of carbamylation. To this end, binding of cH2-p1 to cHSA-1, cHSA-2, and cHSA-3 proteins with low to high Hcit% had Kd values of 1.2 × 10–4, 9.7 × 10–5, and 9.9 × 10–5 M, respectively (Figure ). Although the ζ-potential of cHSA shifted from −7.84 mV for cHSA-1 to −11.7 mV for cHSA-3 (Table and Figure a), that difference in surface charge did not seem to affect the binding affinity of cH2-p1. The similar Kd values may indicate that the ligand binding may be specific to homocitrulline.
Figure 7

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into (A) cHSA-1, (B) cHSA-2, and (C) cHSA-3.

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into (A) cHSA-1, (B) cHSA-2, and (C) cHSA-3.

cH2-p1 Binding to cFgn

One previous study collected sera from rabbits inoculated with cHSA and revealed that such sera contained antibodies that recognized homocitrulline-containing collagen telopeptides.[20] To verify if cH2-p1 is homocitrulline-specific, regardless of protein it may be conjugated to, cH2-p1 binding to native and carbamylated Fibrinogen (Fgn) was tested (Figure ). For cH2-p1 binding to Fgn, we found no exothemic or endothemic peaks generated during the whole titration, seeming to indicate that no affinity existed between Fgn and this peptide. While for cH2-p1 binding to cFgn the titration was endothermic with strong titration peaks, with a model Kd value of 8.4 × 10–5 M. The result of cH2-p1 titration to Fgn showed cH2-p1 does not bind to this protein without carbamylation. Unlike cHSA, binding of cH2-p1 to cFgn was found to be endothemic, which suggests that the binding is entropy-driven. The Hcit% for cFgn was measured to be 12.0%, yet still with similar Kd for binding to cH2-p1 compared to cHSA. The endothermic binding may involve complex conformational change that may require further study to determine the mechanism involved.
Figure 8

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into (A) native Fgn and (B) cFgn.

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into (A) native Fgn and (B) cFgn.

Binding Mechanism Study through Titration of cH2-p1 to cHSA with Anti-Hcit

To study if the binding sites on cHSA for cH2-p1 are the same for antibody targets homocitrulline, cHSA was incubated with anti-Hcit prior to cH2-p1 titration test. The control test was done by titration of cH2-p1 into the solution containing only anti-Hcit, and the result (Figure S4) proved that cH2-p1 has a very low binding affinity toward anti-Hcit, with the Kd fitted to be 1 × 10–3 M; therefore, the interaction between cH2-p1 and antibody is not to be considered in later tests. To fit the titration data for cH2-p1 to cHSA with and without the presence of anti-Hcit, a fixed Kd of 9.7 × 10–5 M as we determined before for cH2-p1 titrated into cHSA was used, and good fitting results were obtained for both cases (Figure ). To accommodate the low concentration of obtained antibody, the concentration of both cHSA and cH2-p1 have been lowered by 10 times, thus resulting in a lower c value and more linear and flatter fitting curve. Nevertheless, a difference was found on binding enthalpy, that the binding enthalpy is less for cH2-p1 to cHSA when anti-Hcit is present. However, due to the low c binding nature, the binding enthalpy cannot be precisely quantified. If we assume that the cH2-p1 targets the same binding sites with anti-Hcit, it is reasonable to regard the difference as the result of decreased n value due to the occupancy of binding sites by anti-Hcit.
Figure 9

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into cHSA with cHSA-Abs and without cHSA been incubated with anti-Hcit.

ITC raw titration data and fitting of integrated heat plots of peptide cH2-p1 titration into cHSA with cHSA-Abs and without cHSA been incubated with anti-Hcit.

Binding Mechanism Study through Molecular Docking

Since cH2-p1 binds to both cHSA and cFgn with high affinity, we assume that cH2-p1 has the binding site for homocitrulline residues. To explore the possible binding mode of homocitrulline, molecular docking was studied. The model ligand Hcit-res instead of its amino acid form was created to simulate the carbamylated lysine residue as a simplification. The peptide chain of Hcit-res was simplified with two peptide bonds terminated with methyl groups. Longer peptide chains are not preferable as they may require a larger box for docking and reduce the site specificity. With the purpose to search for the best pose of the side chain and avoid trapping of peptide chains into binding pockets, all non-side-chain bonds of Hcit-res were set to be non-rotatable and only the side-chain bonds were allowed to be rotatable.[40] The top-ranked binding site cH2-p1-C1 is composed of four residues, Ala3, Arg5, Thr6, and Ile7. Figure shows the top 2 scored poses, with the binding affinity of −3.1 kcal/mol for both conformations. Since the surface of pocket is mainly low electrostatic potential area, docking of carbamoyl group-containing ligand should be expected. The same affinity score for both poses suggests that they are equally favorable. Pose a has the primary amine buried inside the pocket, and pose b has the secondary amine buried inside the pocket. Since the positively charged Arg5 is involved in the binding pocket, docking of lysine residues should not be considered as favorable as homocitrulline residues. Although it is possible that homocitrulline residues may dock into other binding sites, by doing docking experiments on all other two potential binding pockets provided by I-TASSER, we found that none of the top-scored poses are reasonable with homocitrulline side chain docked into the pocket.
Figure 10

Two ways, (a) pose a and (b) pose b, of docking the designed model Hcit-res (Pink carbon chain) into the candidate pocket of cH2-p1 (green carbon chain) by AutoDock Vina. The surface of cH2-p1 is shown with an electrostatic potential map.

Two ways, (a) pose a and (b) pose b, of docking the designed model Hcit-res (Pink carbon chain) into the candidate pocket of cH2-p1 (green carbon chain) by AutoDock Vina. The surface of cH2-p1 is shown with an electrostatic potential map. Based on all results obtained above, the avidity of cH2-p1 to carbamylated proteins was significantly higher than to the native protein. However, it is still relatively low compared to antibody binding of even native HSA. This could arise from the fact that according to the molecular docking result, only four residues in cH2-p1 are involved in binding of homocitrulline to form a binding pocket. This limited interaction between peptide amino acids and the small fraction of homocitrulline residues trapped inside may present the maximum limit of the binding affinity—short of further engineering of the amino acids involved in binding homocitrulline.

Conclusions

Several peptide sequences were identified using a Ph.D.-12 phage display library against carbamylated HSA. ELISA results revealed that the phage clone obtained through biopanning on cHSA-1 might be a TUP and does not have a significantly high binding specificity, while several phage clones obtained from cHSA-2 biopanning showed high binding specificity to both cHSA-1 and cHSA-2. ITC results were used to identify GSAARTISPSLL (cH2-p1) to have a dissociation constant (Kd) of 9.7 × 10–5 M during exothermic binding to cHSA, and was almost 1 order of magnitude lower than its Kd to native HSA. The binding affinity for cH2-p1 toward cHSA was not found to be influenced by the extent of carbamylation. Moreover, cH2-p1 was found to bind cFgn over the native protein. This process was endothermic, but yielded a similar Kd (8.4 × 10–5 M) as that for cHSA binding. The binding of cH2-p1 to cHSA was weakened when anti-Hcit is present in cHSA solution, suggesting that anti-Hcit occupied the same sites where cH2-p1 binds to cHSA. Through molecular docking study, we identified two poses homocitrulline residues may have when docking into the cH2-p1 pocket. The potential of cH2-p1 to bind carbamylated proteins over native ones is the baseline for looking at removal of these proteins from CKD patients for further treatment.

Experimental Section

Materials

Albumin from human serum (HSA, lyophilized, fatty-acid-free) and fibrinogen from bovine plasma (Fgn, ≥75% clottable) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Canada). Sodium cyanate, 2-aminobenzoic acid (ABA), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and sodium tetraborate (ST) were also provided by Sigma-Aldrich (Canada). Amicon ultra-15 centrifugal filter unit was provided by Millipore Sigma. M13KE phage display kit (Ph.D-12) was provided by New England Biolabs. Homocitrulline/Citrulline Assay Kit was provided by Cell Biolabs for quantification of carbamylation. Anti-carbamylation (homocitrulline) polyclonal antibody (anti-Hcit), obtained by immunizing rabbits with carbamylated protein, was provided by Cayman Chemical. QIAprep Spin M13 Kit was provided by QIAGEN for template purification. Anti-M13 Antibody (HRP) (Mouse Monoclonal antibody) was provided by Sino Biological. ELISA Substrate Solution (1-Step Ultra TMB) was provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific. Protein targets used were filter-sterilized before biopanning, and all solutions or supplies used in biopanning were autoclaved in advance. Sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) precast gels (10% Mini-PROTEAN TGX stain-free protein gels) and protein standard ladder (Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standards) were provided by Bio-Rad. All candidate peptides without group protection were synthesized by GL Biochem, and the purity was verified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with 98%, and the composition was confirmed by mass spectrometry.

In Vitro Carbamylation of HSA

In vitro carbamylation of HSA and Fgn was done as reported before.[27] In brief, HSA carbamylation was carried out by incubating HSA sample (0.6 mM) under 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) with sodium cyanate at room temperature with stirring for 8 days, and Fgn carbamylation was carried out by incubating the Fgn sample (0.008 mM) under 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) with sodium cyanate (0.1 M) at room temperature with stirring for 2 days. The initial concentration of sodium cyanate was varied for different degrees of carbamylation of cHSA. Unbound free cyanate was removed by three cycles of ultrafiltration with PB. ABA assay, as reported elsewhere, was used to prove the absence of residual cyanate.[41] In brief, 0.5 mL of solution that may contain residual cyanate was added into a solution of 6 N HCl with 2-aminobenzoic acid for 1 min in boiling water bath and then cooled to room temperature, and the absorbance at 310 nm was recorded for quantification of residual cyanate. The solution protein concentration was determined using UV–vis spectroscopy from absorbance at 280 nm and was then diluted to desired concentrations. The extent of carbamylation was quantified by the percentage of carbamylated lysine, marked as Hcit%, and was measured through homocitrulline assay following manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, the samples were treated with Proteinase K in the presence of SDS at 37 °C for 2 h and then incubated with a ureanitrogen reagent and diacetyl monoxime at 97 °C for 30 min. Precipitates were removed by centrifugation at 18 000g for 10 min, and the supernatant was transferred into a 96-well plate and analyzed at 550 nm with a plate reader. A standard curve of homocitrulline solution provided in the kit (0 to 600 μM) was made for the determination of homocitrulline in the sample. Hcit% was calculated by dividing the measured homocitrulline with the total lysine amount estimated (59 for one HSA molecule, 208 for one Fgn molecule).

Protein Characterization

The size and ζ-potential for both HSA and cHSA were measured through Malvern Nano-ZS DLS. For ζ-potential measurement, protein solution was concentrated to 8 mg/mL with 1 mM PB (pH 7.4). For size measurement, protein solution was diluted to 0.25 mg/mL with 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4). All measurements were taken at 25 °C, and each reported data represents average of three measurements. To verify the structure integrity of HSA after carbamylation, SDS-PAGE was performed on a Bio-Rad mini-protean electrophoresis system. The test was done following the standard protocol provided by Bio-Rad. In brief, both HSA and CHSA solutions were denatured by mixing with SDS and heating at 60 °C for 5 min. After loading samples into wells of a precast gel, electrophoresis was performed at 200 V for ∼30 min. The gel was stained with 0.2% Coomassie Brilliant Blue, followed by destaining in acetic acid solution.

Biopanning against cHSA

Six wells of a 96-well ELISA passive binding plate were filled with cHSA target (100 μg/mL in 0.1 M carbonate buffer, pH 8.6) with 150 μL each well. The plate was incubated in a moisture environment at 4 °C overnight, followed by discarding that target solution and refilling fully with HSA blocking (5 mg/mL in 0.1 M carbonate buffer, pH 8.6) buffer for another 1 h at 4 °C. Prior to binding to target, the phage library was first screened on HSA for negative panning. The phage library was prepared at 1011 pfu/mL in TBST, and was added by pipetting 100 μL into wells preblocked with HSA only. After incubation for 1 h at room temperature, the library solution was transferred to the plate with target, and was incubated for another 1 h with gentle shaking. Unbound phages were removed by washing the wells with TBST-0.1% 10 times, and the tween concentration was increased to 0.5% after the first round. Surface-bound phages were eluted with 100 μL of glycine elution buffer (pH 2.2, containing 1 mg/mL HSA) for 15 min and were neutralized with Tris-HCl buffer (pH 9.1). Elution was performed three times for each well, and the collected eluates were denoted as E1, E2, and E3.

Phage Amplification and Purification

With a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, 20 mL of E. coli early log (OD600 0.01–0.05) culture was mixed with 500 μL of each eluate and was incubated for 4.5 h at 37 °C with vigorous shaking. Bacteria were then separated by centrifuging at 12 000g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at 4 °C overnight, with addition of 1/6 volume of PEG/NaCl to precipitate the phage. The precipitate was then centrifuged and further purified by redissolving in 1 mL of tris buffered saline (TBS) and precipitating again with 0.167 mL of PEG/NaCl. The purified pellet was redissolved in 200 μL of TBS and stored at 4 °C.

Phage Titration

Each amplified eluate was titrated with the blue plague titration method given in the supplier’s manual. In brief, 200 μL of E. coli middle log (OD600 ∼ 0.5) culture was mixed with 10 μL of eluate (10-fold serial dilution in TBS in the range of 108–1014) and 790 μL of melted top agar and poured onto a prewarmed LB/IPTG/Xgal plate. All plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight, and the blue plagues were counted as plaque-forming units (pfu).

Phage Clone Separation and Template Isolation for Sequencing

For single-clone phage collection, each separate blue plague for amplified eluate was picked and suspended into 100 μL of TBS in a 96-well plate. The plate was heated at 60 °C for 45 min for sterilization. By mixing with 50 μL of 80% glycerol, each phage suspension was stored at −20 °C. The single-stranded phage DNA was isolated with the QIAprep Spin M13 Kit following supplier’s manual. In brief, each single-clone phage suspension was amplified by adding 10 μL into 4 mL of E. coli early log (OD600 0.01–0.05) culture and incubating for 4 h at 37 °C. After removing bacteria by centrifuge, 1/100 volume of buffer MP was added to each phage supernatant to incubate for 2 min, and a total of 2.1 mL of phage solution was loaded into QIAprep spin column and centrifuged to flow-through the column. To enable M13 phage lysis and template purification, 0.7 mL of buffer PB was loaded into the column and flow-through by centrifuge, followed by 0.7 mL buffer PE loading and flow-through by centrifuge. The template was eluted by loading 100 μL of EB. After incubating for 10 min, the eluate was collected by centrifuge. The template concentration (20–80 ng/μL) and purity were verified by a NanoDrop UV–vis spectrophotometer in its ssDNA measurement mode. For sequencing, 10 μL of each template was mixed with 1 μL of −96 gIII sequencing primer, and the template sequence was obtained through standard Sanger DNA sequencing.

ELISA of Selected Phage Clones

To each well of an ELISA 96-well passive binding plate, 300 μL of protein of interest (1 mg/mL in 0.1 M carbonate buffer, pH 8.6) was added and was incubated in a moist environment at 4 °C overnight, followed by discarding protein solution and refilling fully with TBST-0.5% blocking buffer for another 1 h at 4 °C. After washing the wells with TBST-0.5% to remove unbound protein, 20 μL of amplified single-clone phage solution (1013 pfu/mL) was added with 180 μL of TBST-0.5% buffer and was incubated for 2 h. After washing the wells with TBST-0.5% to remove unbound phages, 200 μL of TBST-0.5% containing 1 μL of HRP-Anti-M13 (0.55 μg/mL) was added to each well and was incubated for 1 h. After washing the wells with TBST-0.5% to send away unbound antibodies, 100 μL of HRP substrate was added to each well and was incubated for 10 min. The reaction was quenched by adding 100 μL of 1 M H2SO4, and the absorbance at 450 nm was collected.

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)

The ITC experiment was performed on a Nano ITC low-volume isothermal titration calorimeter (TA Instruments) with an active cell volume of 170 μL and an injection syringe volume of 50 μL. All proteins and peptides were dissolved using the 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). For titration of HSA/cHSA, the protein concentration was 0.1 mM and the peptide concentration was 2 mM. For titration of Fgn/cFgn, the protein concentration was 4 μM and the peptide concentration was 0.21 mM. Titration was performed with 50 consecutive injections of 0.95 μL of peptide solution with 200 s spacing between each injection. For titration of the peptide into cHSA with antibody, cHSA was incubated with anti-Hcit for 2 h at 25 °C before titration, and both tirant and titrate solutions were prepared with 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) containing 50% glycerol and 0.02% NaN3. The stirring rate and isotherm temperature were set at 150 rpm and 25 °C, respectively. The ITC data were processed by NanoAnalyze Data Analysis v3.10.0 for baseline subtraction and model fitting (independent model). The heat of peptide dilution was subtracted from signal by doing control titration tests. All data were repeated at least twice, and the data presented is a representative curve since only very small variations among repeats were observed. The fitted curves were analyzed through the statistical test program. The Gaussian distribution of results was obtained through repeated simulation with controlled random data perturbations for 1000 trials, and the 95% confidence interval was given and is shown in the fitting graph.

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate–Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

SDS-PAGE was performed on a Bio-Rad mini-protean electrophoresis system. The test was done following the standard protocol provided by Bio-Rad. In brief, protein samples were denatured by mixing with SDS and heating at 60 °C for 5 min. After loading samples into wells of a precast gel, electrophoresis was performed at 200 V for ∼30 min. The gel was stained with 0.2% Coomassie Brilliant Blue, followed by destaining in acetic acid solution.

Molecular Docking

Structure of cH2-p1 was created through I-TASSER Protein Structure and Function Prediction Services (Figure a).[42−44] The potential binding sites for this predicted model were also provided in the result. A total of three possible binding sites were determined, with the top binding site (marked as cH2-p1-C1, and the surface is shown by the blue area in Figure b) showing significantly higher C-score[45] (0.33) compared to the other two, 0.14 and 0.13. To simulate the homocitrulline residue present in protein, a model molecule Hcit-res (Figure ) was created. The docking grids set up in Python Molecule Viewer (PMV), version 1.5.6, were centered in the pocket of cH2-p1-C1. The box for docking was set to 8 Å × 16 Å × 14 Å to fully enclose the surface regions of all residues involved in cH2-p1-C1. AutoDock Vina was used for the docking experiment.[46]
Figure 11

(a) Modeling conformation of cH2-p1. (b) Top-ranked potential binding site, cH2-p1-C1, of cH2-p1.

Figure 12

Model molecule Hcit-res to mimic homocitrulline residue.

(a) Modeling conformation of cH2-p1. (b) Top-ranked potential binding site, cH2-p1-C1, of cH2-p1. Model molecule Hcit-res to mimic homocitrulline residue.
  44 in total

1.  On the value of c: can low affinity systems be studied by isothermal titration calorimetry?

Authors:  W Bruce Turnbull; Antonio H Daranas
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Autoantibodies recognizing carbamylated proteins are present in sera of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and predict joint damage.

Authors:  Jing Shi; Rachel Knevel; Parawee Suwannalai; Michael P van der Linden; George M C Janssen; Peter A van Veelen; Nivine E W Levarht; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil; Anthony Cerami; Tom W J Huizinga; Rene E M Toes; Leendert A Trouw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Phage display: concept, innovations, applications and future.

Authors:  Jyoti Pande; Magdalena M Szewczyk; Ashok K Grover
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 4.  Pitfalls in the detection of citrullination and carbamylation.

Authors:  M K Verheul; P A van Veelen; M A M van Delft; A de Ru; G M C Janssen; T Rispens; R E M Toes; L A Trouw
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 9.754

5.  Allosteric properties of carbamylated hemoglobins.

Authors:  T C Lee; Q H Gibson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1981-05-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Sequence-Dependent Peptide Surface Functionalization of Metal-Organic Frameworks.

Authors:  Gang Fan; Christopher M Dundas; Cheng Zhang; Nathaniel A Lynd; Benjamin K Keitz
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Modification of lysine 69 reactivity in bovine growth hormone by carbamylation of its N-terminal group.

Authors:  C Nowicki; J A Santomé
Journal:  Int J Pept Protein Res       Date:  1981-07

8.  Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Ambrish Roy; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Carbamylated albumin is one of the target antigens of anti-carbamylated protein antibodies.

Authors:  Shuichiro Nakabo; Motomu Hashimoto; Shinji Ito; Moritoshi Furu; Hiromu Ito; Takao Fujii; Hajime Yoshifuji; Yoshitaka Imura; Ran Nakashima; Kosaku Murakami; Nobuo Kuramoto; Masao Tanaka; Junko Satoh; Akihito Ishigami; Satoshi Morita; Tsuneyo Mimori; Koichiro Ohmura
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.