A supramolecular cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6])-enriched magnetic montmorillonite (CBCM) nanocomposite was prepared and characterized. CB[6] played a prominent role as a capping agent, helping in better distribution of the nanoparticles, and as a binder between nanoparticles. Montmorillonite provided structural stability and fortified ultrafast adsorption toward dyes. Its application in the removal of cationic dyes from wastewater was systematically assessed. Process parameters such as pH, initial dye concentration, dosage, temperature, and time were optimized. Kinetics and isotherms of the process were described using pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Langmuir isotherm, respectively. CBCM exhibited rapid dye removal capacity in short reaction times with q max of 199.20, 78.31, and 55.62 mg g-1 and K2 of 0.0281, 0.0.0823, and 0.0953 L mg-1 min-1 for crystal violet, methylene blue, and rhodamine B, respectively. Benefiting from the synergetic effects of montmorillonite surface hydrophobicity, abundant carbonyl groups of CB[6], and magnetic properties of copper ferrite, CBCM demonstrated outstanding dye removal capacity, negligible leaching at saturation, and high tolerance toward harsh conditions. This intrinsic nature is expedient in prolonged industrial operations. To demonstrate industrial viability, syringe filtration and continuous flow fixed-bed column operations were validated. The CBCM fixed-bed column demonstrated stable dye removal efficiency with 10-100 mg mL-1 dye at 10-50 mL min-1 flow rates. Utilizing the magnetic and catalytic activities of the copper ferrite nanoparticles, CBCM was recycled using a magnet, regenerated, and reused for several cycles. CB[6] remarkably improved the performance of the nanocomposite and made it suitable for different effluent treatment techniques. This may pave a sustainable way toward the efficient onsite treatment of effluent at the industrial scale.
A supramolecular cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6])-enriched magneticmontmorillonite (CBCM) nanocomposite was prepared and characterized. CB[6] played a prominent role as a capping agent, helping in better distribution of the nanoparticles, and as a binder between nanoparticles. Montmorillonite provided structural stability and fortified ultrafast adsorption toward dyes. Its application in the removal of cationic dyes from wastewaterwas systematically assessed. Process parameters such as pH, initial dye concentration, dosage, temperature, and time were optimized. Kinetics and isotherms of the process were described using pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Langmuir isotherm, respectively. CBCM exhibited rapid dye removal capacity in short reaction times with q max of 199.20, 78.31, and 55.62 mg g-1 and K2 of 0.0281, 0.0.0823, and 0.0953 L mg-1 min-1 for crystal violet, methylene blue, and rhodamine B, respectively. Benefiting from the synergetic effects of montmorillonite surface hydrophobicity, abundant carbonyl groups of CB[6], and magnetic properties of copper ferrite, CBCM demonstrated outstanding dye removal capacity, negligible leaching at saturation, and high tolerance toward harsh conditions. This intrinsic nature is expedient in prolonged industrial operations. To demonstrate industrial viability, syringe filtration and continuous flow fixed-bed column operations were validated. The CBCM fixed-bed column demonstrated stable dye removal efficiency with 10-100 mg mL-1 dye at 10-50 mL min-1 flow rates. Utilizing the magnetic and catalytic activities of the copper ferrite nanoparticles, CBCM was recycled using a magnet, regenerated, and reused for several cycles. CB[6] remarkably improved the performance of the nanocomposite and made it suitable for different effluent treatment techniques. This may pave a sustainable way toward the efficient onsite treatment of effluent at the industrial scale.
Dyes
have been extensively used in textile industries and are the
foremost source of severe water pollution.[1] More than 1 00 000 types of dyes are available in
the market, and each year, about 7 00 000 tons of dyes
are prepared globally, leading to severe health hazards.[2−4] Numerous methods such as adsorption,[5] membrane filtration,[6] coagulation,[7] distillation,[8] oxidation,[9] ion exchange,[10] electrolysis,[11] precipitation,[12] photochemical
degradation,[13] and reverse osmosis[14] have been used to treat dye-contaminated water.
Among these, adsorption is a widespread method used for industrial-scale
effluent treatment. Based on targeted pollutants, these methods utilize
different adsorbents such as activated carbon, clays, ion-exchange
materials, biosorbents,[8,15] zeolite,[16,17] biodegradable composites,[18] and hybrid
materials.[18,19] Nevertheless, adsorption over
clay minerals and modified clay-based materials have been proven to
be highly favored over other adsorbents due to their process simplicity,
cost-effectiveness, commercial availability, good efficiency, and
eco-friendly nature.[20,21] However, these adsorbents suffer
from common operational issues such as reusability, stability in long-duration
operations, and dye leaching after saturation. Clays were modified
with different materials to overcome these operational issues. In
this direction, montmorillonite (MMT) clay applicability in dye removal
at a larger scale was improved by enriching with cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6])
and copper ferrite nanoparticles.Cucurbit[n]urils (CB[n]s) are
cage-shaped supramolecules known for their host–guest complex
formation ability, especially with cationic molecules, through noncovalent,
electrostatic interactions.[22] The inner
cavity of CB[n] is hydrophobic and accessible through
two identical carbonyl portals to form inclusive complexes with the
cationic guests. CB[n]s are also unique candidates
for nanoparticle-capping, where they bind over the nanoparticle surface
and also provide an available cavity for guest binding.[23−25] The complexation of CB[n]with azo dyes,[26] textile dyes,[27] and
reactive dyes[28,29] was studied by Buschmann and
Karcher to understand the binding mechanism and its probable application
in wastewater treatment. Among homologues of CB[n], CB[6] is a suitable adsorbent for wastewater treatment due to
its better thermal stability, good binding nature, and poor solubility
in water.[23] Moreover, CB[6] is insoluble
in water and can be recovered by simple filtration after the experiment,
whereas CB[5] and CB[7] are soluble in water. When CB[6]was directly
used as an adsorbent, it was only able to remove a minimum quantity
of dyes but exhibited exceptional binding with greater selectivity.
To utilize the advantages of CB[n] dye-binding capabilities,
Karcher et al. suggested coating CB[n] over a solid
support material to prevent leaching of CB[n] into
the effluent.[29,30] Jin and group have implemented
a similar strategy to prepare a CB[7]-modified polymer for adsorption
of methylene blue (MB)[31] and CB[6]-anchored
silica for adsorption of an antibioticsulfamonomethoxine.[32] Lazzara et al. have employed halloysite as solid
support for CB[8] to adsorb toluene vapors.[33] CB[6] possesses a lower equilibrium association constant when complexed
with a larger dye molecule, but it does exhibit shallow interactions
with large positively charged moieties.[34] Similarly, researchers have reported the use of CB[6]-based composites
for different applications.[35−37] This phenomenon could greatly
improvise traditional clay-based adsorbents in terms of selectivity
and reusability. Therefore, utilizing the nanoparticle-capping ability
and complexation phenomenon of CB[6], we have synthesized an improved
CB[6]-capped magneticcobalt ferrite nanoparticle-enriched montmorillonite
(CBCM) clay nanocomposite for wastewater treatment. Since the separation,
regeneration, and reusability of the adsorbent material are crucial
concerns needed to be addressed, the magnetically separable montmorillonitecomposite by introducing magnetic nanoparticles into clay sheets makes
adsorbent separation easy, rapid, and suitable for bulk solutions
in heterogeneous systems.[38] On the other
hand, copper ferrite nanoparticles possess unique properties such
as moderate saturation magnetization, high coercivity, chemical stability,
mechanical hardness, and magneticcrystalline anisotropy.[39,40] Owing to these interesting properties, we used CoFe2O4 nanoparticles to induce magnetism in the CBCM nanocomposite.
The CBCM composite aimed to provide enhanced, rapid dye adsorption;
good reusability; and selectivity for wastewater treatment, and it
was synthesized by an ultrasonication-assisted co-precipitation method
and characterized using adequate analytical techniques. Comprehensive
dye removal studies using the CBCM nanocomposite have been conducted
for the removal of selected dyes, crystal violet (CV), methylene blue
(MB), and rhodamine B (RhB), from aqueous solutions (Figure S1, Supporting Information (SI)). Large-scale industrial
applicability of CBCM was also demonstrated through syringe filters
and continuous flow fixed-bed column operations.
Materials
and Methods
Iron(III) chloride hexahydrate, cobalt(II) chloride
hexahydrate,
and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Merck Inc. Glycoluril, montmorilloniteK10 (Sigma-Aldrich), crystal violet (CV) (Sigma-Aldrich, C25H30ClN3, 407.98 g mol–1),
methylene blue (MB) (Sigma-Aldrich, C16H18ClN3S.3H2O, 373.9 g mol–1), and rhodamine
B (Sigma-Aldrich, C28H31ClN2O3, 479.01 g mol–1) were used as received
without any further purification.
Synthesis of the CBCM Nanocomposite
CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, exfoliated montmorillonite
(ex-MMT), and CB[6]were prepared according to previously reported
methods.[41−43] An aqueous solution containing 1.0 g of as-prepared
CoFe2O4 nanoparticles was taken in a beaker,
and 0.6 g of CB[6]was added to the solution and then sonicated for
1 h. The resulting suspension was further stirred at room temperature
for 1 h; then, solid CB[6]-capped cobalt ferrite nanoparticles (CB[6]-CoFe2O4) were isolated using a magnet, washed with DI
water, and dried in an oven at 100 °C for 3 h. Solid, dried CB[6]-CoFe2O4was added to a 5.0% aqueous suspension of ex-MMT.
The suspension was sonicated for 1 h and stirred overnight at room
temperature. The suspended solid was separated using a magnet, washed
several times with DI water, and dried at 100 °C in an oven,
followed by calcination at 200 °C for 2 h to obtain a black CBCM
nanocomposite (Figure S1, SI), which was
characterized and used as such for dye removal studies.
Characterization of the CBCM Nanocomposite
Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction
(XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission
electron microscopy (TEM), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)
surface area measurements, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and diffuse
reflectance UV–visible (DR UV–vis) spectroscopy were
used to characterize morphological, optical, and structural properties
of the CBCM nanocomposite. The FTIR spectrum was obtained in the range
of 4000–400 cm–1 using a PerkinElmer spectrum-II
infrared spectrophotometer with an attenuated total reflectance (ATR)
accessory. XRD analysis was carried out using a PANalytical X’pert-pro
X-ray diffractometer in the 2θ range of 10–80° using
Cu Kα radiation. FE-SEM images were acquired using a LEO 1550
Gemini (Zeiss) scanning electron microscope. TEM imaging was carried
out on a TEI, Tecnai G2, F30 (300 kV potential) instrument. TGA was
performed on a NETZSCH TG 209F1 Libra TGA209F1D-0105-L instrument
in the temperature range of 50–1000 °C at a 10 °C
min–1 step size in an argon atmosphere. Solid-state
diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu
UV-2600 spectrophotometer in the range of 200–900 nm at a 1
nm step size. Nitrogen adsorption-based five-point BET surface area
measurement was carried out on a Quantachrome Autosorb-IQ instrument.
ζ Potential was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer Lab instrument
by dispersing 2 mg of CBCM in 2 mL of DI water. In dye removal studies,
the dye concentration was determined by the Beer–Lambert method
using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Labindia, model: UV-3000+).
The pH of the solutions was measured using a Hanna edge pH meter equipped
with a HI11310 electrode calibrated with a three-point method using
standard buffer solutions. The point of zero charge (PZC) was determined
by the standard solid addition method.[44]
Dye Adsorption Studies
Batch
Experiments
A set of experiments
was carried out to determine the effect of varying pH, temperature,
adsorbent loading, and dye concentration on the dye removal efficiency
of CBCM. Adsorption isotherms were plotted by experimentally determining
the relationship between the dye concentration and the amount of dye
adsorbed. The kinetics of adsorption was determined by performing
experiments with respect to time. All dye stock solutions were prepared
by dissolving a definite amount of solid in deionized water to obtain
the desired concentration. Working solutions of dyes were prepared
from the stock solution (200 mg L–1) to the desired
concentrations (10–100 mg L–1). All of the
experiments were carried out at a constant speed on a slow-moving
platform shaker. The initial pH value of the dye solutions was adjusted
with 0.1 M HCL or 0.1 M NaOH solution in pH studies.Adsorption
experiments were carried out typically by adding a definite amount
of the CBCM nanocomposite to 3 mL of the dye solution in 5 mL polypropylene
vials. The adsorption studies were carried out at different pH values
(2, 4, 7, 8, and 10), temperatures (35, 45, and 55 °C), adsorbent
dosages (0.03–0.2 mg mL–1), and initial dye
concentrations (10–100 mg mL–1). UV–vis
analysis of all adsorbed samples was performed after reaching equilibrium
at the maximum absorption wavelength (λmax) of the
dye (CV, MB, and RhB exhibited maximum absorbance (λmax) at 585, 665, and 554 nm, respectively). The absorbance of the dye
solution from batch experiments was measured after magnetic separation
of CBCM to avoid turbidity. The amount of the dye adsorbed per unit
mass of the adsorbent at time t and equilibrium are q (mg g–1) and qe, (mg g–1), respectively, calculated
using eqs and 2The
dye removal efficiency (%) at a time (t) and
equilibrium (e) is calculated using eq where C0 (mg L–1), C (mg L–1), and Ce (mg L–1)
are the initial dye concentration and remaining dye concentration
after adsorption at time t and equilibrium, respectively. V is the liquid volume (L) and W is the
dosage of the solid adsorbent (g).
Recovery
and Regeneration of the CBCM Nanocomposite
After completion
of dye adsorption, the CBCM nanocomposite was
recovered with a magnet and was regenerated by the catalytic reduction
method using 0.1 M sodium borohydride. Since the dye adsorbed on the
CBCM composite was difficult to desorb using DI water, electrolyte,
or mild acid washes due to resilient adsorption, the catalytic reduction
method was adopted to regenerate the nanocomposite quickly and to
reduce secondary dye effluent generation. In a typical procedure,
the CBCM nanocomposite was treated with a 0.1 M sodium borohydride
aqueous solution until complete decolorization was achieved and collected
with the help of a magnet, washed with deionized water, dried in an
oven at 110 °C for 3 h, and reused in subsequent adsorption experiments.
Dye Removal Using CBCM-Loaded Syringe Filters
Commercial nylon syringe filters with a 0.22 μm pore size
were loaded with the CBCM nanocomposite. Then, 20 mg of the CBCM nanocomposite
was dispersed uniformly in 5 mL of DI water and injected into the
syringe filters; then, they were dried at 60 °C in a hot air
oven. These CBCM-loaded syringe filters were used for the demonstration
of instant dye removal on a small scale. The dye-contaminated waterwas filtered through the CBCM-modified syringe filter using a syringe
to obtain decolorized water instantly (Figure S5, SI). The saturated CBCM-modified syringe filter was regenerated
by passing 10% sodium borohydride solution until complete removal
of color. Then, it was washed with DI water and dried completely in
a hot air oven. The regenerated syringe filter was again used for
instant dye removal (SI).
Dye Removal Using a Continuous Flow CBCM Fixed-Bed
Column
A continuous flow fixed-bed column was prepared by
loading a polycarbonate column with the CBCM nanocomposite, with a
1.8 cm distance in between sand layers and the polymer mesh separator.
Dye effluent was fed from the top of the column using a rotary drive
pump. The flow rate was adjusted using a flow-regulating knob fitted
before the inlet. Influent and effluent dye concentrations were determined
using UV–visible spectra by collecting at least 2 mL of the
solution at definite time intervals. Complete details of the study
with photographs, graphs, and a representative video are available
in the Supporting Information (SI).
Results and Discussion
FTIR
Formation
of the CBCM nanocomposite
was determined using FTIR spectra by comparing with spectra of its
constituents (Figure A,B). Cobalt ferrite exhibited two characteristic peaks at 588 and
416 cm–1 in the FTIR spectrum, which were assigned
to metal–oxygen intrinsic vibrations of tetrahedral and octahedral
sites in the spinel ferrite structure, respectively.[45,46] These characteristic vibrational peaks shifted to 590 and 420 cm–1, respectively, in CBCM due to different metal–oxygen
bond lengths. The spectrum of pure CB[6] exhibited peaks at 1713,
965, and 799 cm–1 assigned to carbonyl stretching,
mixed vibrations of C–C and C–N bonds, and the rocking
of CH2, respectively (Figure S2A, SI). A minor shift was observed for CB[6]carbonyl peaks when splitting
into two at 1726 and 1628 cm–1, while other characteristic
vibration peaks shifted to 971 and 757 cm–1 in the
CBCM nanocomposite, attributed to the capping of CB[6] over cobalt
ferrite nanoparticles. Interestingly, the two distinct carbonyl stretching
peaks at 1726 and 1628 cm–1 signified that both
carbonyl portals of CB[6]were asymmetrical. This confirmed that either
one CB[6] molecule binds to two cobalt ferrite nanoparticles or CB[6]
molecule interconnects nanoparticles with exfoliated MMT, causing
the magnetic nanoparticles to stick to the clay lamella (Figure A). The FTIR spectrum
of MMT exhibited characteristic peaks at 1040 and 522 and 467 cm–1 attributed to the Si–O stretching and bending
vibrations, respectively (Figure S2A).
These peaks shifting in the CBCM spectrum to 1044 and 528 and 468
cm–1, respectively, also confirmed the noncovalent
interaction between the carbonyl group of CB[6] and the Si active
sites of MMT. The FTIR spectrum provided insights into the framework
of the CBCM nanocomposite, which confirmed the presence and molecular
interactions among cobalt ferrite, MMT, and CB[6] in the CBCM nanocomposite.
Moreover, CB[6] also exhibited a molecular adhesive-like nature by
causing the nanoparticles to stick to the clay lamella. Structural
features of CBCM were further investigated and supported by XRD, DR-UV,
and TGA.
Figure 1
(A) FTIR spectra, (B) FTIR spectra in the range of 300–1800
cm–1, (C) XRD diffractograms, (D) DR-UV spectra,
(E) TGA thermograms, and (F) derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) plots
of the CBCM nanocomposite in comparison with CoFe2O4 nanoparticles.
(A) FTIR spectra, (B) FTIR spectra in the range of 300–1800
cm–1, (C) XRD diffractograms, (D) DR-UV spectra,
(E) TGA thermograms, and (F) derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) plots
of the CBCM nanocomposite in comparison with CoFe2O4 nanoparticles.
XRD
A comparison of the powder XRD
diffractogram of CoFe2O4with that of the CBCM
nanocomposite is presented in Figure C. Intense diffraction peaks of CoFe2O4 at 2θ = 18.0, 30.1, 35.4, 43.1, 53.4, 57.0, and 62.6°
were ascribed to the reflection of 111, 220, 311, 400, 422, 511, and
440 planes of CoFe2O4, which were well-indexed
to the cubic spinel structure (JCPDS card no. 22-1086).[47] Peaks at 2θ = 19.8, 26.6, 34.9, and 50.138°
represent the characteristic peaks of MMT (JCPDS file no. 29-1498)[48] (Figure S2B). CB[6]
merely showed a broad hump in XRD spectra and did not have any distinct
effect on XRD due to its amorphous nature. Diffraction peaks of the
CBCM nanocomposite were obtained at 2θ = 17.7, 19.8, 26.6, 30.2,
34.9, 35.5, 43.3, 50.138, 52.6, 57.1, and 62.8° (Figure C). All characteristic diffraction
peaks of CoFe2O4 and MMTwere indexed in the
CBCM nanocomposite diffractogram, which confirmed the presence of
CB[6]-capped CoFe2O4within the MMTclay lamella.
The average crystallite size of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles
in the CBCM nanocomposite was found to be 26.2 nm, calculated using
the Scherrer equation with respect to the most intense peak at 2θ
35.5° (311) corresponding to nanoparticles.
TGA
Thermogravimetric analysis of
the CBCM nanocomposite resulted in three distinct weight-loss regions
(Figure E,F). The
first weight-loss region due to moisture loss was observed below 180
°Cwith a total 6.0% weight loss. CBCM exhibited a major weight
loss of 23.1% from 280 to 450 °C attributed to the presence of
CB[6]. A similar weight-loss region was also observed in CB[6] (Figure S2C). The third small weight-loss region
near 800 °C specified the phase shift of MMT. These insights
confirmed the incorporation of cobalt ferrite and CB[6]within the
MMT lamella. Onsite temperature shifts for CB[6] indicated the improved
thermal stability of CB[6] in the CBCM nanocomposite. Moreover, the
absence of the peak representing deformation of cobalt ferrite at
around 800 °C in the CBCM thermogram confirmed the nanoparticle-capping
of CB[6] via noncovalent interactions discussed in the Section . These interactions
were instrumental in providing stability and preventing the deformation
of nanoparticles at higher temperatures.
Solid-State
DR UV–Vis Spectroscopy
Diffused reflectance UV–visible
(DR UV–vis) spectra
of CoFe2O4 and CBCM are shown in Figure D. Adsorption of CBCM unveiled
the combined nature of CB[6], CoFe2O4, and MMT
(Figure D). Optical
adsorption of CB[6] and MMT occurred in the UV region below 400 nm,
whereas optical adsorption of CoFe2O4 took place
majorly in the UV region then gradually reduced toward the near-infrared
region with band-edge adsorption at 1090 nm[19,49] (Figures D and S2E, SI). Similarly, CBCM exhibited a broad absorption
band in the UV region, which extended toward the visible region. Band-edge
adsorption at 1049 nm was noted with a blue shift compared to bare
CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. Broad absorption in the
UV–vis region of CBCM confirmed the exfoliation of MMT and
specified the interaction between CoFe2O4 and
MMT.
FE-SEM and TEM
The morphology of
the CBCM nanocomposite was studied using FE-SEM and TEM (Figure ). The original structure
of exfoliated MMTcovered with CB[6]-capped CoFe2O4 in the CBCM nanocomposite confirmed the modification of the
clay lamella (Figure A,B). MMTwas used as a solid medium for supporting CB[6]-capped
CoFe2O4 nanoparticles to improve the stability
and applicability of the particles. Correspondingly, the TGA of the
CBCM nanocomposite also confirmed the higher thermal and structural
stability of nanoparticles within the CBCM nanocomposite. Energy-dispersive
X-ray (EDX) spectra of the composite established the presence of all
of the individual components in the nanocomposite (Figure C). The average particle size
of CoFe2O4 in CBCM was determined to be about
26 nm. Similar observations were made by TEM micrographs (Figure E–H). CB[6]-capped
CoF2O4 nanoparticles were distributed over exfoliated
MMT layers, creating void spaces. The CoFe2O4 nanoparticles appeared to be densely anchored on the surface of
exfoliated MMT, implying the strong interaction between CB[6]-capped
CoFe2O4 nanoparticles and MMT. More importantly,
even after prolonged sonication, the nanoparticles were strongly bound
to the MMT lamella with the help of magnetic dipolar interactions
among nanoparticles and noncovalent interactions induced by CB[6].
EDX spectra recorded from the selected points of the CBCM nanocomposite
also confirmed the presence of CB[6], MMT. The organic matter surrounding
the nanoparticles was attributed to the capping of CB[6]. The selected
area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the nanoparticle region
in the CBCM nanocomposite exhibited a multicrystalline nature with
visible diffraction bright spots and diffuse circles (Figure F, inset). The first two sets
of diffuse circles indicating 220 and 311 planes correspond to the
most intense peaks of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles.
Likewise, the SAED image of the clay region exhibited mostly a diffuse
circle without notable bright spots, indicating the presence of the
amorphous MMTclay (Figure H, inset). SAED patterns confirmed the presence of nanoparticles
and clay, indicating the formation of the CBCM nanocomposite. Insights
gained from electron microscopic images indicate that the CBCM structural
framework could be determined as CB[6]-capped CoFe2O4 decorated over the clay lamella. CB[6]-capped CoFe2O4 nanoparticle aggregates comprised even smaller subunits,
indicating that nanoparticle assemblies formed first and then agglomerated
over the MMTclay lamella. Finally, the CBCM nanocomposite surface
area determined by the five-point BET method was found to be 71.87
m2 g–1, suitable for adsorption experiments
(Figure S2F). Based on structural and morphological
topographies of the CBCM nanocomposite, its application was explored
in dye removal from aqueous solutions using three different dyes,
CV, MB, and RhB, in batch and continuous flow experiments, envisaging
the CBCM nanocomposite use in industrial effluent treatment.
Figure 2
(A, B) FE-SEM
images, (C) EDAX spectra from FE-SEM, (D) EDAX spectra
from TEM, (E–H) TEM images, and SAED diffraction patterns (inset)
of the CBCM nanocomposite. Here, the inset in (F) represents the SAED
pattern recorded from the nanoparticle region and the inset in (H)
shows the SAED pattern taken from the clay region of the CBCM nanocomposite.
(A, B) FE-SEM
images, (C) EDAX spectra from FE-SEM, (D) EDAX spectra
from TEM, (E–H) TEM images, and SAED diffraction patterns (inset)
of the CBCM nanocomposite. Here, the inset in (F) represents the SAED
pattern recorded from the nanoparticle region and the inset in (H)
shows the SAED pattern taken from the clay region of the CBCM nanocomposite.
Dye Removal Studies
The CBCM nanocomposite
was investigated for the removal of selected dyes [CV, MB, and RhB]
from water by performing batch and continuous flow experiments. Initial
dye removal experiments were conducted to evaluate the synergetic
effects of CBCM in comparison with its constituents. Under identical
experimental conditions, maximum dye adsorption for all three dyes
was observed in the following order: CBCM > CoFe2O4–CB[6] > CB[6] > CoFe2O4 (Figure A). Thus,
CBCM exhibited
the maximum adsorption, revealing synergic effects between its constituents.
Capping CoFe2O4with CB[6] eventually amplified
the adsorption capacity of the nanoparticles due to partially negative
carbonyl portals of CB[6] and increased affinity toward cationic dye
molecules. When these CB[6]-capped CoFe2O4 nanoparticles
were intercalated into the MMT lamella, they created a similar effect
and helped to achieve more adsorption. With these results in hand,
comprehensive dye removal batch experiments were conducted, and adsorption
isotherms and kinetics were determined. Further, studies on the versatile
applicability, regeneration, and reusability of CBCM were also performed
systematically. CBCM-loaded syringe filters and continuous flow fix-bed
columns were fabricated for instant treatment of wastewater at the
industrial scale.
Figure 3
(A) Comparison of the dye removal efficiency of the CBCM
nanocomposite
with CB[6] and CuFe2O4 nanoparticles to understand
the synergetic effects and (B) point of zero charge plot of the CBCM
nanocomposite.
(A) Comparison of the dye removal efficiency of the CBCM
nanocomposite
with CB[6] and CuFe2O4 nanoparticles to understand
the synergetic effects and (B) point of zero charge plot of the CBCM
nanocomposite.
Effect
of pH
pH is an essential aspect
that gives an understanding of dye–adsorbent interactions and
the ionic form of the dye that is favorable for higher adsorption.[50] To understand the effect of pH on the dye removal
efficiency, different dye solutions with varying pH values from 2
to 10 were studied (Figure A–C). The maximum dye removal percentages for CV (90%)
and MB (52%) were recorded at pH 7 and that for RhB (34%) was observed
at pH 2 under identical experimental conditions. The dye removal percentage
of CV and MB increased with pH until pH 8 and thereafter remained
unchanged, whereas, in the case of RhB, the dye removal percentage
decreased with the increase in the solution pH. This behavior based
on electrostatic interactions was explained by the point of zero charge
(PZC).[44] The PZC is defined as the point
where the surface charge of the adsorbent material is zero. Accordingly,
if the pH is less than the PZC, the adsorbent surface is positively
charged, and if the pH is greater than the PZC, then the adsorbent
surface is negatively charged. The PZC of the CBCM nanocomposite was
determined as 7.3 using the solid addition method (Figure B). Hence, below pH 7.3, CBCM
acquires a positive surface charge. In this condition, both H+ ions and the dye cations compete for positively charged adsorption
sites on the CBCM surface, resulting in a decreased adsorption capacity.[51] If the pH was more than 7.3, the CBCM surface
would have been predominated by a negative charge; therefore, electrostatic
interactions occur between the dye and the negatively charged adsorption
sites, resulting in higher dye adsorption. RhB exhibited maximum adsorption
between pH 2 and 3. In RhB, the COOH group exists in the protonated
form below pH 3, thus leading to the formation of RhB+ ion,
whereas at pH above 3, the dye exists in the zwitterion form.[50] The zwitterion increases the aggregation of
RhB and also leads to dimer formation. Due to its bulky nature, it
was difficult to accommodate the dimeric form of RhB in CBCM pores,
but the monomeric form was suitable for adsorption.[52] Moreover, CB[6] also ideally favored the host–guest
type of binding with the RhB monomer, and the protonated form of RhBwas more favorable than the zwitterion form, which resulted in higher
RhB removal at lower pH.[53]
Figure 4
Effect of various parameters
on the adsorption of CV (purple),
MB (blue), and RhB (pink) dyes from aqueous solutions using the CBCM
nanocomposite. (A–C) Effects of pH, (D–F) temperature,
(G–I) adsorbent dosage, and (J–L) initial dye concentration.
Here, the red line with the triangle symbol (◀) represents
color removal efficiencies and the black line with the sphere symbol
(●) represents the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (qe).
Effect of various parameters
on the adsorption of CV (purple),
MB (blue), and RhB (pink) dyes from aqueous solutions using the CBCM
nanocomposite. (A–C) Effects of pH, (D–F) temperature,
(G–I) adsorbent dosage, and (J–L) initial dye concentration.
Here, the red line with the triangle symbol (◀) represents
color removal efficiencies and the black line with the sphere symbol
(●) represents the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (qe).
Effect of Temperature
Temperature
is another crucial factor that influences adsorbent behavior. Adsorption
studies were carried out by the CBCM nanocomposite at 25, 35, 45,
and 55 °C (Figure D–F). The dye removal percentage was increased from 90 to
93 for CV, from 52 to 58 for MB, and from 34 to 40 for RhBwhen the
temperature was increased from 25 to 45 °C, indicating the endothermic
adsorption nature. This behavior occurred due to the lowered viscosity
of the dye solution at a higher temperature, which facilitated faster
diffusion of the dye into the nanocomposite. Beyond 45 °C, the
dye removal percentages remained constant, which could be due to weak
physical interaction between the dye molecules and the nanocomposite.[51,54] To attain ease of process and energy efficiency, all dye removal
experiments of MB and CVwere carried out above the PZC (pH 7) and
RhB removal was performed at pH 2–3 at ambient temperature.
Effect of CBCM Nanocomposite Dosage
The
effect of CBCM dosage (from 0.03 to 0.2 mg mL–1)
on the dye removal capacity is presented in Figure G–I. With the increase in the CBCM
dosage from 0.03 to 0.2 mg mL–1, the dye removal
percentage was increased from 48 to 100% for CV, 26 to 95% for MB,
and 18 to 85% for RhB. With the increase in the CBCM dosage, the availability
of adsorption area/sites was increased, leading to complete decolorization.
On further increasing the nanocomposite concentration to 0.26 mg mL–1, the removal efficiency of MB and RhB reached 100%,
whereas CV attained complete removal efficiency with only 0.20 mg
mL–1 CBCM dosage. However, adsorption capacity (qe) values decreased simultaneously with increased
CBCM loading.
Effect of Dye Concentration
The
adsorption capacity of CBCM was evaluated at the equilibrium state
by varying the dye concentration while keeping the CBCM dosage constant,
and the results are presented in Figure J–L. The CBCM qe value gradually increased with increasing dye concentration,
and the highest qe values of 218 mg g–1 for CV, 80 mg g–1 for MB, and 79
mg g–1 for RhBwere exhibited. Higher dye concentrations
amplified the concentration gradient and developed a driving force
between the dye solution and CBCM adsorption sites, resulting in maximum
adsorption capacity. At lower dye concentrations, the maximum amount
of dye molecules was adsorbed on the nanocomposite, attaining higher
dye removal efficiency. In contrast, at higher dye concentrations,
the active adsorption sites became saturated and lower removal efficiency
was observed.[55] On increasing the dye concentration
from 10 to 100 mg mL–1, the dye removal percentage
decreased from 100 to 44 for CV, 95 to 16 for MB, and 85 to 16 for
RhB, due to adsorbent saturation. The adsorption process was less
effective by dye concentration and demonstrated decent adsorption
capacity.
Effect of Time
Within the initial
5–10 min, the dye adsorption process was quick, and maximum
adsorption occurred at this stage. In the later stage when the process
approached equilibrium, the adsorption process became slower due to
the interparticle diffusion of the dye within the pores of the CBCM
nanocomposite. After 30 min, the adsorption and desorption processes
reached an equilibrium where the dye solution in the bulk was in a
dynamic balance with the nanocomposite.[56] CBCM exhibited very rapid dye adsorption, removing the maximum dye
in less than 5 min, which could be advantageous for continuous flow
dye removal applications. Kinetics and adsorption isotherm parameters
of the process were calculated based on time-dependent adsorption
studies.
Adsorption Kinetics
Kinetic plots
of CV, MB, and RhB removal using CBCM are shown in Figure , and the obtained rate constant
values are listed in Table . Experimental data were fitted into nonlinear pseudo-first-order
and pseudo-second-order kinetics models (Figure ). The nonlinear pseudo-first-order kinetics
was expressed by eq (57)where qe and q are the
amounts of dye (mg g–1) adsorbed on the adsorbent
at equilibrium and at a given time t (min), respectively,
and k1 is the rate constant of adsorption
(g mg–1 min–1).
Figure 5
Nonlinear adsorption
kinetics curves (A–C) and nonlinear
adsorption isotherms (D–F) for adsorption of CV, MB, and RhB
onto the CBCM nanocomposite under optimized conditions using 10 ppm
initial dye concentration.
Table 1
Kinetic Parameters of CV, MB, and
RhB Adsorption onto the CBCM Nanocomposite
pseudo-first-order
pseudo-second-order
dye
C0 (mg mL–1)
qe,(exp) (mg g–1)
q1e(cal) (mg g–1)
K1 (min–1)
R12
q2e(cal) (mg g–1)
K2 (L mg–1 min–1)
R22
CV
10
50.00
49.06
0.432
0.663
50.9
0.0281
0.963
MB
10
47.52
47.85
0.907
0.854
48.7
0.0823
0.987
RhB
10
42.58
41.60
0.932
0.697
42.4
0.0953
0.951
Nonlinear adsorption
kinetics curves (A–C) and nonlinear
adsorption isotherms (D–F) for adsorption of CV, MB, and RhB
onto the CBCM nanocomposite under optimized conditions using 10 ppm
initial dye concentration.The nonlinear pseudo-second-order
kinetics were plotted using eq where k2 is the
rate constant for the pseudo-second-order adsorption process. The
values of k2 and qe were determined using eq .According to kinetic plots, the CBCM nanocomposite
followed pseudo-second-order
kinetics for the dye adsorption process on the CBCM nanocomposite
(Table and Figure ). The correlation
factors for pseudo-first-order kinetic plots were less than 0.854,
whereas pseudo-second-order kinetic plots exhibited correlation factors
above 0.950 for all dyes used in the experiment. Pseudo-second-order
rate constants were calculated to be 0.0281 L mg–1 min–1 (CV), 0.0823 L mg–1 min–1 (MB), and 0.0953 L mg–1 min–1 (RhB) under experimental conditions (Table ). The CBCM nanocomposite followed
the pseudo-second-order kinetic model for cationic dye adsorption.
This implies that adsorption could be dominated by chemisorption rather
than physical adsorption. Chemisorption could be a result of host–guest
interactions between cationic dyes and CB[6] or ionic interactions
with the negatively charged surface of the CBCM nanocomposite.
Adsorption Isotherms
Adsorption
isotherms provide valuable information about adsorption behavior,
surface properties, and affinity of the dye toward the adsorbent.
The amount of dye adsorbed on the nanocomposite surface and the amount
of dye remaining in the solution at a fixed temperature and pH at
equilibrium can be evaluated by isotherms.[54] The equilibrium adsorption of the CBCM nanocomposite was analyzed
using Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin adsorption isotherms.[58]The Langmuir isotherm assumes that the
monolayer of dye molecules is adsorbed at definite homogeneous sites
on the surface of the adsorbent and that these sites cannot be further
occupied by another dye molecule, which can be expressed using eq (59)where qe is the
adsorbed amount of dye at equilibrium (mg g–1), Ce is the equilibrium concentration of the dye
in solution (mg L–1), qm is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg g–1), and KL is the Langmuir constant.The Freundlich
adsorption isotherm assumes that dye adsorption
takes place at heterogeneous sites on the surface of the adsorbent
and that the adsorption capacity of an adsorbent depends on the concentration
of the dye, which can be expressed using eq (60)where Kf is the
adsorption capacity and is the adsorption intensity.The
Temkin isotherm discusses the effect of indirect interactions
of the dye and the adsorbent in the process. It assumes that the heat
of adsorption of all molecules in the layer linearly decreases with
an increase in surface coverage, which can be expressed using eq (61)where b (kJ mol–1) is the Temkin
constant associated with sorption enthalpy, KT (L g–1) is the Temkin equilibrium
binding constant, R (kJ mol–1 K–1) is the gas constant, and T is the
absolute temperature in Kelvin.In this study, Langmuir, Freundlich,
and Temkin isotherm models
were fitted with experimental data and then the isotherm constants
and correlation factors were calculated and are listed in Table . Based on the correlation
factor (R2) values, it can be deduced
that the adsorption process of cationic dyes on the surface of CBCM
follows the Langmuir isotherm model owing to high correlation values
of 0.999, 0.962, and 0.985 for CV, MB, and RhB, respectively (Figure D–E and Table ). This implies that
monolayer adsorption took place over the CBCM nanocomposite. Freundlich
and Temkin isotherm models did not correlate with the experimental
data. The maximum adsorption capacities (qmax) of the CBCM nanocomposite for CV, MB, and RhB dyes calculated using
the Langmuir model were 199.20, 78.31, and 55.62 mg g–1, respectively. A high adsorption capacity indicates that good coverage
of cationic dyes over the adsorbent surface could be due to the abundant
negatively charged adsorption sites induced by the presence of CB[6].
Table 2
Nonlinear Isotherm Parameters for
the Adsorption of CV, MB, and RhB onto CBCM at 293 Ka
model
parameters
CV
MB
RhB
Langmuir
KL (L mg–1)
0.999
2.233
2.736
qm (mg g–1)
199.20
78.31
55.62
R2
0.999
0.962
0.985
Freundlich
Kf (L g–1)
98.47
54.03
45.20
n
5.20
10.63
19.70
R2
0.847
0.921
0.837
Temkin
KT (L mg–1)
28.71
4475.40
2.56
b (kJ mol–1)
0.079
0.357
0.863
R2
0.932
0.939
0.853
Bold values indicate the highest
correlation factor values obtained for isotherms, based on these values,
it is concluded that the CBCM dye removal process followed the Langmuir
isotherm model.
Bold values indicate the highest
correlation factor values obtained for isotherms, based on these values,
it is concluded that the CBCM dye removal process followed the Langmuir
isotherm model.
Recycling and Reusability
Adsorbent
regeneration studies were performed to establish the reusability of
the CBCM nanocomposite. Due to the presence of magneticcobalt ferrite
nanoparticles, recycling of the CBCM nanocomposite from the reaction
mixture was much easier and the removal of surface-bound dye was crucial.
In the case of common adsorbents, surface-bound dyes were extracted
using mild acidic or solvent washes for a prolonged time. Similarly,
CBCM was soaked and stirred in various desorption-initiating media,
such as acidic (aqueous HCl, pH 3–4) and basic (aqueous NaOH,
pH 8–9) solutions, deionized water, and organic solvents (acetone),
and compared with MMT (Figure D). Almost negligible desorption was exhibited by CBCM in
all conditions, whereas MMT readily desorbed dyes when basic and organic
solvents were used. Even after soaking and stirring under harsh conditions,
the dye did not desorb from the CBCM surface, showing superstrong
surface-binding in comparison with MMT. This higher stability was
observed in CBCM either due to strong binding between dyes with increased
interactions induced by CB[6] and the nanocomposite or due to the
ultrafast adsorption–desorption cycles. This behavior is highly
helpful in long-duration and extreme operational conditions observed
in the industry. For example, the textile industry effluents often
reach a pH of 8–10 and effluent treatment operations require
longer durations. In this scenario, the pristine MMTadsorbent is
not beneficial as it may gradually desorb all adsorbed dyes. Therefore,
with conventional adsorbents, effluent treatment must be completed
within the speculated time or repeated often. Under these extreme
conditions, the CBCM nanocomposite serves better to treat the effluent
as such without worrying about dye desorption. It is also important
to develop a suitable regeneration method to reuse the CBCM nanocomposite.
Utilizing the catalytic activity of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles,
we have developed an efficient catalytic reduction method to rapidly
regenerate the CBCM nanocomposite and simultaneously degrade the adsorbed
dye. Catalytic degradation in the presence of nanoparticles and a
mild reducing agent is widely used for the removal of many pollutants.[62] Here, the same phenomenon was utilized for faster
regeneration of the CBCM nanocomposite after dye removal experiments.
The CBCM nanocomposite was regenerated using the sodium borohydride-based
catalytic reduction method and reused for several consecutive dye
removal cycles (Figure A). This method offered easy, cost-effective, and fast regeneration
of the nanocomposite along with efficient dye degradation with minimal
secondary effluent generation compared to desorption. Typically, the
CBCM nanocomposite was treated with a definite amount of a 0.1 M sodium
borohydride aqueous solution until complete decolorization, followed
by washing with deionized water. It was separated using a magnet,
then dried at 110 °C in an oven and reused for the next consecutive
cycle. The regenerated CBCM nanocomposite exhibited excellent dye
removal efficiency for at least five cycles without any loss in adsorption
capacity (Figure A).
A slight reduction in the dye removal percentage in the fifth cycle
was observed merely due to the loss of catalyst during handling. The
regenerated CBCM nanocomposite was characterized by FTIR and FE-SEM,
which confirmed that there was no significant structural or morphological
deformation during dye removal or the regeneration process (Figure B). This study confirmed
that the CBCM nanocomposite indeed exhibited an ultrastrong binding
nature and low-desorption behavior, which is quite useful for treating
real-time industrial effluent where the process is lengthy and the
effluent condition is uncertain. The catalytic degradation method
for regeneration of the adsorbent also provided new insights for future
use.
Figure 6
(A) Reusability cycles of the CBCM composite, (B) FTIR spectra,
(C) Fe-SEM image of the recycled CBCM nanocomposite after five cycles,
and (D) digital photographs of dye desorption studies with MMT (vials
labeled X) and the CBCM nanocomposite (vials labeled Y) performed
in DI water (neutral, pH 7) and acidic (pH 3–4), basic (pH
8–9), and acetone solutions.
(A) Reusability cycles of the CBCM composite, (B) FTIR spectra,
(C) Fe-SEM image of the recycled CBCM nanocomposite after five cycles,
and (D) digital photographs of dye desorption studies with MMT (vials
labeled X) and the CBCM nanocomposite (vials labeled Y) performed
in DI water (neutral, pH 7) and acidic (pH 3–4), basic (pH
8–9), and acetone solutions.
Mechanism
FTIR analysis was performed
to determine the mechanism for adsorption of dye on the surface of
the CBCM nanocomposite. Figure A shows the FTIR spectra of CV, MB, and RhB after being adsorbed
on the surface of the CBCM nanocomposite in the 2000–400 cm–1 range. A complete spectrum is provided in Figure S3, SI. Before adsorption, the surface
of the CBCM nanocomposite has characteristic peaks at (a) 590 and
420 cm–1 (Co–O), (b) 1726 and 1628 cm–1 (C=O), and (c) 528 and 468 cm–1 (Si–O). After dye adsorption, a new peak at around 1593 cm–1 distinctly appeared and a more broadened peak was
observed in the case of CV adsorption (Figure A). This peak can be assigned to the vibration
of the aromatic ring owing to the C=C bond, indicating that
all of the three dyes are anchored on the surface of the CBCM nanocomposite.
A minor peak shift was observed in the peaks associated with the Co–O,
C=O, and Si–O bonds in the CBCM nanocomposite after
dye adsorption. The peaks corresponding to Co–O were shifted
to 577 and 413 cm–1, those corresponding to C=O
were shifted to 1720 and 1647 cm–1, and those corresponding
to Si–O were shifted to 524 and 464 cm–1.
This peak shift is attributed to the electrostatic interactions between
cationic dyes and the negatively charged surface of the CBCM nanocomposite.
This behavior has been supported by ζ potential analysis. The
ζ potential of the CBCM nanocomposite was −32.5 mV at
the experimental pH, indicating good emulsion stability and dispersion.
At the same pH, MMT and CuFe2O4NPs exhibited
ζ potentials of −9.16 and −16.2 mV, respectively.
Hence, the incorporation of CB[6] helped to attain better emulsion
stability. This also confirms that the surface of the composite becomes
more negatively charged than those of pristine nanoparticles and MMTclay due to the presence of abundant CB[6]carbonyl portals. This
negatively charged surface can actively adsorb cationic dyes, which
improved the dye removal capacity of the CBCM nanocomposite. Moreover,
CB[6] is also capable of forming host–guest complexes and external
binding complexes with dyes, leading to an increased dye uptake.[63] Based on this, different types of possible molecular
interactions over the surface of CBCM with cationic dyes are illustrated
in Figure B. Overall,
the CBCM nanocomposite was sturdily bound with the dye molecules through
strong hydrogen bonding with carbonyl portals of CB[6], weak H-bonding,
and electrostatic interactions with the MMT lamella and the nanoparticles,
resulting in rapid cationic dye adsorption.
Figure 7
(A) FTIR spectra of CBCM
after adsorption of (a) RhB, (b) MB, and
(c) CV for mechanistic investigation. (B) Probable mechanism for adsorption
and (C) the continuous flow column.
(A) FTIR spectra of CBCM
after adsorption of (a) RhB, (b) MB, and
(c) CV for mechanistic investigation. (B) Probable mechanism for adsorption
and (C) the continuous flowcolumn.
Versatile Application of the CBCM Nanocomposite
for Dye Removal
Treatment of a Mixture
of Dyes (Model Effluent)
Industrial effluent often contains
more than one dye. Individually
measuring the adsorption capacity for each dye may not be conclusive
enough to understand its practical application. Hence, we have prepared
a model industrial effluent with a mixture of CV, MB, and RhB dyes
in three different acidic (2–3), neutral (7), and basic (11–12)
pH ranges, and the model industrial effluent was treated with the
CBCM nanocomposite. Figure S4 shows the
change in absorbance with increasing CBCM quantity. All of the pH
absorbances for CV and MB in water decrease consistently, whereas
for RhB, the absorbance decreases rapidly in the following order:
acidic > neutral > basic. Upon addition of sufficient adsorbent,
complete
dye removal was obtained in a short time. Further, it is found that
the q and the dye removal percentages for the mixture
of dyes are similar to those measured individually, which confirmed
that the CBCM nanocomposite can be used for the treatment of real
effluent.
Syringe Filtration Method
CBCM
exhibited rapid and stable adsorption performance under ambient conditions
for the removal of selected dyes. To widen the practical applicability
of the material, we have also prepared syringe filters loaded with
the CBCM nanocomposite for fast, inline water treatment, as shown
in Figure S5. The syringe filter method
provided conceptual proof that CBCM could be used for inline operations
due to its rapid, irreversible adsorption behavior. Commercially available
syringe filters with the CBCM nanocomposite and the dye-contaminated
water is passed through the modified filters using a syringe. To our
delight, CBCM-modified filters rapidly trapped all dyes from wastewater
and instantly produced decolorized clean water (Video S1, SI). The rapid adsorption with a minimum contact
time of CBCM enables its possible application in household effluent
treatment where rapid removal of contaminants is required. Further,
CBCM application was also evaluated under industrial conditions using
continuous flow fixed-bed column operations.
Continuous Flow Fixed-Bed Column for Rapid
and Large-Scale Operations
To investigate the applicability
of the CBCM nanocomposite in industrial-scale effluent treatment,
a tubular polycarbonate column was prepared sandwiching CBCM between
sand beds (Figure C). The dye-contaminated waterwas pumped using a rotary pump and
collected instantly from the bottom tap (Figure S5). The CBCM-loaded fixed-bed column exhibited rapid dye removal
efficiencies at higher flow rates from 10 to 50 mL min–1 under testing conditions. The dye removal efficiency in the continuous
flow fixed-bed column was investigated by varying dye concentrations
and flow rates. With a 10 mL min–1 flow rate using
50 mg mL–1 CV, the CBCM column reached a breakthrough
point after 1400 min (Figure S6, SI). Even
with an increased flow rate up to 50 mL min–1, complete
dye removal was observed within a short contact time, but the column
reached a breakthrough point early due to adsorbent overloading. On
increasing the initial dye concentration to 100 mg mL–1 with a higher flow rate, color removal was persistent until reaching
the breakthrough point, and the dye adsorption capacity of CBCM remained
unchanged. This study ensured that CBCM was quite beneficial for industrial-scale
effluent treatment with continuous feed. We fed the influent from
the top of the column to ensure that CBCM-based fixed-bed columns
can also be used in gravity-driven wastewater treatment operations
where electricity is not available.Further, the CBCM nanocomposite
efficiency was compared with a fewsimilar adsorbents reported in
the literature (Table S1, SI). CBCM displayed
a relatively high adsorption capacity, rapid adsorption, and good
reusability than many other adsorbents reported. Due to its magnetic
nature and good in-process stability, the CBCM nanocomposite could
be recycled conveniently and reused, which is beneficial over traditional
adsorbents like clay and activated carbon. Additionally, the CBCM
nanocomposite proved to be suitable for different types of application
techniques, and the continuous flow and batch methods are advantageous
over traditional adsorbents. Moreover, CB[6] presence improved desorption
behavior and selectivity, thus making it suitable for extreme industrial
conditions such as long-duration operations.
Conclusions
A functional CBCM nanocomposite where the supporting
montmorilloniteclay sheets are decorated with CB[6]-capped magnetiteCoFe2O4 nanoparticles has been synthesized through a simple
ultrasonication-assisted solution process. In the CBCM nanocomposite,
CB[6] provided additional selectivity, improved dye removal efficiency
owing to its negatively charged carbonyl portals, and strong molecular
interactions with dyes. It also helped in better distribution of the
nanoparticles and acted as a binder between MMT and CoFe2O4, providing additional stability to the CBCM nanocomposite.
The adsorption performance of this nanocomposite has been tested for
several parameters such as pH, temperature, CBCM concentration, adsorbate
concentration, and time on a series of cationic dyes, CV, MB, and
RhB, by monitoring the fingerprint spectral changes in the solutions.
It is confirmed that the nanocomposite has excellent adsorption capabilities
toward the tested dyes. Also, it can be quickly separated from waterwith the help of a magnet due to the integrated magnetic nanoparticles.
Adsorption over the CBCM nanocomposite was so strong that it was stable
even in higher- and lower-pH solvents, including solvents such as
acetone. Once the nanocomposite attains saturation, simple catalytic
reduction treatment at moderate conditions can easily and efficiently
regenerate it at almost no expense to its adsorption capacity in the
consecutive cycles. More importantly, the nanocomposite shows satisfactory
tolerance against the variations in pH conditions/dye concentrations.
Even in a more realisticcondition where mixtures of dyes are involved,
the nanocomposite shows extremely good multiplex absorbability without
decreasing the adsorption capacity for each of the dyes as compared
with those adsorbed individually. CBCM worked well in the syringe
filtration method and fixed-bed column applications even at higher
flow rates, reaching up to 50 mL min–1 with dye
concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 mg mL–1. Taking
advantage of the simple preparation, quick adsorption, rapid extraction,
and easy regeneration of the nanocomposite, this new type of adsorbent
is very promising for high-efficiency and low-cost real-time wastewater
treatment at the industrial scale.
Authors: J Wang; J B Neaton; H Zheng; V Nagarajan; S B Ogale; B Liu; D Viehland; V Vaithyanathan; D G Schlom; U V Waghmare; N A Spaldin; K M Rabe; M Wuttig; R Ramesh Journal: Science Date: 2003-03-14 Impact factor: 47.728