| Literature DB >> 33553920 |
Chandra Kanth P1, Maitrayee U Trivedi1, Khushali Patel1, Nirendra M Misra1, Manoj Kumar Pandey1.
Abstract
A supramolecular cucurbit[6]uril (Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33553920 PMCID: PMC7860087 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(A) FTIR spectra, (B) FTIR spectra in the range of 300–1800 cm–1, (C) XRD diffractograms, (D) DR-UV spectra, (E) TGA thermograms, and (F) derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) plots of the CBCM nanocomposite in comparison with CoFe2O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 2(A, B) FE-SEM images, (C) EDAX spectra from FE-SEM, (D) EDAX spectra from TEM, (E–H) TEM images, and SAED diffraction patterns (inset) of the CBCM nanocomposite. Here, the inset in (F) represents the SAED pattern recorded from the nanoparticle region and the inset in (H) shows the SAED pattern taken from the clay region of the CBCM nanocomposite.
Figure 3(A) Comparison of the dye removal efficiency of the CBCM nanocomposite with CB[6] and CuFe2O4 nanoparticles to understand the synergetic effects and (B) point of zero charge plot of the CBCM nanocomposite.
Figure 4Effect of various parameters on the adsorption of CV (purple), MB (blue), and RhB (pink) dyes from aqueous solutions using the CBCM nanocomposite. (A–C) Effects of pH, (D–F) temperature, (G–I) adsorbent dosage, and (J–L) initial dye concentration. Here, the red line with the triangle symbol (◀) represents color removal efficiencies and the black line with the sphere symbol (●) represents the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (qe).
Figure 5Nonlinear adsorption kinetics curves (A–C) and nonlinear adsorption isotherms (D–F) for adsorption of CV, MB, and RhB onto the CBCM nanocomposite under optimized conditions using 10 ppm initial dye concentration.
Kinetic Parameters of CV, MB, and RhB Adsorption onto the CBCM Nanocomposite
| pseudo-first-order | pseudo-second-order | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dye | ||||||||
| CV | 10 | 50.00 | 49.06 | 0.432 | 0.663 | 50.9 | 0.0281 | 0.963 |
| MB | 10 | 47.52 | 47.85 | 0.907 | 0.854 | 48.7 | 0.0823 | 0.987 |
| RhB | 10 | 42.58 | 41.60 | 0.932 | 0.697 | 42.4 | 0.0953 | 0.951 |
Nonlinear Isotherm Parameters for the Adsorption of CV, MB, and RhB onto CBCM at 293 Ka
| model | parameters | CV | MB | RhB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langmuir | 0.999 | 2.233 | 2.736 | |
| 199.20 | 78.31 | 55.62 | ||
| Freundlich | 98.47 | 54.03 | 45.20 | |
| 5.20 | 10.63 | 19.70 | ||
| 0.847 | 0.921 | 0.837 | ||
| Temkin | 28.71 | 4475.40 | 2.56 | |
| 0.079 | 0.357 | 0.863 | ||
| 0.932 | 0.939 | 0.853 |
Bold values indicate the highest correlation factor values obtained for isotherms, based on these values, it is concluded that the CBCM dye removal process followed the Langmuir isotherm model.
Figure 6(A) Reusability cycles of the CBCM composite, (B) FTIR spectra, (C) Fe-SEM image of the recycled CBCM nanocomposite after five cycles, and (D) digital photographs of dye desorption studies with MMT (vials labeled X) and the CBCM nanocomposite (vials labeled Y) performed in DI water (neutral, pH 7) and acidic (pH 3–4), basic (pH 8–9), and acetone solutions.
Figure 7(A) FTIR spectra of CBCM after adsorption of (a) RhB, (b) MB, and (c) CV for mechanistic investigation. (B) Probable mechanism for adsorption and (C) the continuous flow column.