| Literature DB >> 33553723 |
Neeraj Choudhary1,2, Gopal L Khatik1, Sunanda Choudhary3, Gurpal Singh4, Ashish Suttee1.
Abstract
Helminths born diseases are related to pitiable management practices and improper control strategies. The medicinal plants contain various phytoconstituents that are liable for their anthelmintic activity. The aerial parts of the Chenopodium album were successively extracted with microwaves assisted extraction using petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, methanol, hydroalcoholic and aqueous solvents to get respective extracts (CAPE, CAEE, CAME, CAHE, and CAAE). All the extracts were analyzed for preliminary phytochemical screening for the identification of phytoconstituents. The anthelmintic activity was analyzed on Indian adult earthworms Eisenia foetida using piperazine citrate (PCT) as a standard drug. All the extracts (apart from CAAE) lead to paralysis and fatality of the earthworms. CAEE extract exhibits highly significant anthelmintic activity at a 10 mg/ml concentration by causing paralysis and fatality of earthworms and was more potent than PCT suspension. At a concentration of 10 mg/ml, paralysis and death time for CAEE was recorded as (10.08 ± 1.11) and (65.28 ± 2.09) respectively, while for standard piperazine citrate, it was recorded as (22.96 ± 1.12) and (65.09 ± 1.23). The CAEE exhibits two major compounds by LC-MS, i.e., NG and DG, that are mainly accountable for the Chenopodium album anthelmintic activity. The plant possesses GABA-mimetic action and thereby leads to flaccid, reversible paralysis of the body wall muscle.Entities:
Keywords: Anthelmintic activity; Chenopodium album; Eisenia foetida; LC-MS; Piperazine citrate
Year: 2021 PMID: 33553723 PMCID: PMC7848649 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Color, consistency and % yield of Chenopodium album extracts.
| Extract | Color observed in Day light | Consistency | % Yield (w/w) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAPE | Light Green | Semisolid | 6.83 |
| CAEE | Dark Green | Semisolid | 8.58 |
| CAME | Dark Green | Semisolid | 12.15 |
| CAHE | Dark Green | Semisolid | 10.12 |
| CAAE | Light Green | Semisolid | 14.56 |
CAPE: Chenopodium album petroleum ether extract; CAEE: Chenopodium album ethyl acetate extract; CAME: Chenopodium album methanolic extract; CAHE: Chenopodium album hydro alcoholic extract; CAAE: Chenopodium album aqueous extract.
Phytochemical screening of the various extracts from Chenopodium album.
| S. No | Chemical Test | CAPE | CAEE | CAME | CAHE | CAAE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alkaloids | |||||
| 2 | Flavonoids | |||||
| 3 | Tannins and phenolic compounds | |||||
| 4 | Saponins | |||||
| 5 | Triterpenoid | |||||
| 6 | Steroids | |||||
| 7 | Carbohydrates | |||||
| 8 | Protein and amino acids |
+: Weak positive test; ++: Low positive test; +++: Strong positive test; -: Negative test. CAPE: Chenopodium album petroleum ether extract; CAEE: Chenopodium album ethyl acetate extract; CAME: Chenopodium album methanolic extract; CAHE: Chenopodium album hydro alcoholic extract; CAAE: Chenopodium album aqueous extract.
Represents the anthelmintic activity of the different extracts of Chenopodium album.
| Conc. (mg/ml) | Paralysis Time (Minutes) | Death Time (Minutes) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VC | PCT | CAPE | CAEE | CAME | CAHE | CAAE | VC | PCT | CAPE | CAEE | CAME | CAHE | CAAE | |
| 2 | --- | 153.43 ± 1.49∗ | 161.10 ± 1.34∗# | 135.45 ± 1.61∗# | 216.25 ± 1.99∗# | --- | --- | --- | 352.49 ± 2.46∗ | 380.23 ± 1.34∗# | 320.66 ± 2.09∗# | 390.89 ± 2.33∗# | --- | --- |
| 4 | --- | 101.52 ± 1.43∗ | 109.10 ± 1.50∗# | 85.95 ± 1.36∗# | 128.40 ± 1.67∗# | --- | --- | --- | 194.16 ± 1.31∗ | 210.72 ± 2.01∗# | 179.86 ± 2.24∗# | 221.29 ± 2.30∗# | --- | --- |
| 6 | --- | 68.19 ± 1.53∗ | 77.74 ± 2.20∗# | 54.86 ± 1.47∗# | 86.45 ± 1.76∗# | --- | --- | --- | 152.45 ± 1.35∗ | 149.42 ± 1.15∗ | 135.35 ± 1.24∗# | 165.02 ± 2.05∗# | --- | --- |
| 8 | --- | 34.14 ± 2.35∗ | 54.84 ± 1.39∗# | 29.02 ± 1.23∗# | 65.86 ± 1.83∗# | --- | --- | --- | 90.98 ± 1.36∗ | 96.25 ± 1.82∗# | 78.48 ± 1.66∗# | 101.06 ± 1.76∗# | --- | --- |
| 10 | --- | 22.96 ± 1.12∗ | 35.52 ± 1.55∗# | 10.08 ± 1.11∗# | 51.45 ± 1.43∗# | 315.78 ± 2.72∗# | --- | --- | 65.09 ± 1.23∗ | 84.94 ± 1.43∗# | 65.28 ± 2.09∗ | 78.93 ± 171∗# | 492.88 ± 1.81∗# | --- |
∗All the Values are expressed as Mean ± SD; N = 5; Statistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA followed by Turkey's multiple comparison test, ∗ represents p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle Control, # represents p < 0.05 vs. Standard(PCT); PCT: Piperazine citrate; CAPE: Chenopodium album petroleum ether extract; CAEE: Chenopodium album ethyl acetate extract; CAME: Chenopodium album methanolic extract; CAHE: Chenopodium album hydro alcoholic extract; CAAE: Chenopodium album aqueous extract.
Figure 1Bar chart represents the time (minutes) taken for the paralysis of Eisenia foetida. Statistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA followed by Turkey's multiple comparison test, ∗ represents p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle Control, # represents p < 0.05 vs. Standard (PCT); PCT: Piperazine citrate, CAPE: Chenopodium album petroleum ether extract, CAEE: Chenopodium album ethyl acetate extract, CAME: Chenopodium album methanolic extract, CAHE: Chenopodium album hydro alcoholic extract, CAAE: Chenopodium album aqueous extract.
Figure 2Bar chart represents the time (minutes) taken for the death of Eisenia foetida. Statistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA followed by Turkey's multiple comparison test, ∗ represents p < 0.05 vs. Vehicle Control, # represents p < 0.05 vs. Standard (PCT); PCT: Piperazine citrate, CAPE: Chenopodium album petroleum ether extract, CAEE: Chenopodium album ethyl acetate extract, CAME: Chenopodium album methanolic extract, CAHE: Chenopodium album hydro alcoholic extract, CAAE: Chenopodium album aqueous extract.
LC-MS identification of major phytoconstituents in the CAEE extract.
| S. No. | Retention time (min.) | AUC (LC) | Mass (m/z) | Mass Fragments (m/z) | Identified component | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.14 | 49.24 | 770.98 | 771, 701, 475, | [ | |
| 2 | 9.3 | 18.53 | 484.36 | 484, 483, 475, 326 | [ |
Molecular docking results of the major phytoconstituents in CAEE.
| S. No. | Molecule | Binding affinity (kcal/mol) GABA receptor (4MS3) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NG | -6.4 |
| 2 | DG | -7.4 |
| 3 | Gamma Aminobutyric acid | -4.2 |
| 4 | Piperazine | -3.3 |
Figure 3(a) Interaction of NG (molecular surface) in the binding site of GABA receptor (b) Interaction of DG (molecular surface) in the binding site of GABA receptor (c) Ribbon structure of GABA receptor (yellow color) and overlay of NG (green color) and DG (red color).