Literature DB >> 3355368

The effects of n-butanol vapour on respiratory rate and tidal volume.

U Kristiansen1, A M Vinggaard, G D Nielsen.   

Abstract

Exposure to n-butanol vapour gave rise to a sensory irritation response which was measured by the reflexively induced decrease in respiratory rate in mice according to the American standard method (E981-84). The response reached maximum within the 1st min of exposure. In this period the expected threshold response (RD-0) and the concentration expected to depress the respiratory rate by 50% (RD-50) were extrapolated to be 233 ppm and 11,696 ppm, respectively. The response followed the dynamics of a bimolecular reaction between butanol and the sensory irritant receptor. For concentrations below 3000 ppm, the response faded due to desensitization. However, concentrations above 3000 ppm gave rise to a new decrease in respiratory rate due to activation of lung receptors. Two types of lung receptors, probably J-receptors and stretch receptors, were involved. The sensory irritation response measured by the standard method gave a threshold response which was comparable to that found by electrophysiological experiments in rats. The irritation response in man as well as the maximum allowable concentration in the working environment were adequately predicted from the sensory irritation response in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3355368     DOI: 10.1007/bf00316639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  24 in total

1.  Olfaction and the common chemical sense: some psychophysical contrasts.

Authors:  W S Cain
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1976-06

Review 2.  Sensory irritation by airborne chemicals.

Authors:  Y Alarie
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1973-11

3.  Contribution of the trigeminal nerve to perceived odor magnitude.

Authors:  W S Cain
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Evaluation of sensory irritation from acrolein-formaldehyde mixtures.

Authors:  L E Kane; Y Alarie
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1978-04

5.  Airborne chemical irritants. Role of the trigeminal nerve.

Authors:  C E Ulrich; M P Haddock; Y Alarie
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1972-01

6.  Sensory irritation and pulmonary irritation of cumene and n-propanol: mechanisms of receptor activation and desensitization.

Authors:  U Kristiansen; L Hansen; G D Nielsen; E Holst
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1986-07

7.  Chemosensitivity of rat nasal trigeminal receptors.

Authors:  W L Silver; D G Moulton
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-05

8.  Propyl ether. II. Pulmonary irritation and anaesthesia.

Authors:  G D Nielsen; J Olsen; J C Bakbo; E Holst
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1985-02

9.  Sensory irritation caused by various industrial airborne chemicals.

Authors:  J C de Ceaurriz; J C Micillino; P Bonnet; J P Guenier
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 10.  Pulmonary and respiratory tract receptors.

Authors:  J G Widdicombe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation and application of the RD50 for determining acceptable exposure levels of airborne sensory irritants for the general public.

Authors:  Yu Kuwabara; George V Alexeeff; Rachel Broadwin; Andrew G Salmon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.