| Literature DB >> 33553662 |
Vo Duy Thong1,2, Nguyen Ngoc Phuc3, Bui Thi Huong Quynh4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is associated with repetitive gastrointestinal symptoms that greatly reduce the patient's quality of life (QoL). Training regarding IBS-related knowledge, medication adherence, lifestyle, and diet adjustments has been demonstrated to strengthen patient QoL. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention carried out by clinical pharmacists to improve the QoL of patients with IBS.Entities:
Keywords: effectiveness of education; irritable bowel syndrome; quality of life
Year: 2020 PMID: 33553662 PMCID: PMC7857291 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JGH Open ISSN: 2397-9070
Figure 1Flow diagram of the study. IG, intervention group; NIG, nonintervention group.
Baseline patient characteristics
| Characteristics | (n = 273) (%) | Group |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG ( | NIG ( | |||||
|
| % |
| % | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 44 | 56 | 42.4 | 64 | 45.4 | 0.622 |
| Female | 56 | 76 | 57.6 | 77 | 54.6 | |
| Mean age | ||||||
| ≤20 | 2.2 | 2 | 1.5 | 4 | 2.8 | 0.367 |
| 21–30 | 16.8 | 24 | 18.2 | 22 | 15.6 | |
| 31–40 | 28.2 | 41 | 31.1 | 36 | 25.5 | |
| 41–50 | 24.2 | 35 | 26.5 | 31 | 22.0 | |
| 51–60 | 19.0 | 19 | 14.4 | 33 | 23.4 | |
| >60 | 9.5 | 11 | 8.3 | 15 | 10.6 | |
| Job | ||||||
| Farmer | 14.3 | 21 | 15.9 | 18 | 12.8 |
|
| Worker | 11.0 | 19 | 14.4 | 11 | 7.8 | |
| Officer | 2.6 | 36 | 27.3 | 34 | 24.1 | |
| Business | 16.8 | 24 | 18.2 | 22 | 15.6 | |
| Student | 4.8 | 8 | 6.1 | 5 | 3.5 | |
| Other | 27.5 | 24 | 18.2 | 51 | 36.2 | |
| Type IBS | ||||||
| IBS‐D | 67 | 92 | 69.7 | 91 | 64.5 | 0.310 |
| IBS‐C | 11.4 | 11 | 8.3 | 20 | 14.2 | |
| IBS‐M | 21.6 | 29 | 22.0 | 30 | 21.3 | |
| Education level | ||||||
| Not graduated common | 59.7 | 82 | 62.1 | 81 | 57.4 | 0.728 |
| High school graduation | 9.9 | 12 | 9.1 | 15 | 10.6 | |
| On high school common | 30.4 | 38 | 28.8 | 45 | 31.9 | |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single | 16.8 | 23 | 17.4 | 23 | 16.3 | 0.806 |
| Married | 83.2 | 109 | 82.6 | 118 | 83.7 | |
* Chi‐square test
There was no statistically significant difference between Intervention and Non‐Intervention groups on gender, age, IBS type, education level, marital status. Occupational factors had statistical differences between the IG and NIG IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS‐D, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea; IBS‐C, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation; IBS‐M, irritable bowel syndrome with alternating constipation and diarrhea.
Patient lifestyle characteristics and living habits
| Characteristics | (n = 273) (%) | Group |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG ( | NIG ( | |||||
|
| % |
| % | |||
| Stress | ||||||
| Yes | 61.2 | 85 | 64.4 | 82 | 58.2 | 0.291 |
| No | 38.8 | 47 | 35.6 | 59 | 41.8 | |
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Yes | 9.9 | 10 | 7.6 | 15 | 10.6 | 0.381 |
| No | 90.8 | 122 | 92.4 | 126 | 89.4 | |
| Drinking alcohol | ||||||
| No | 71.4 | 95 | 72.3 | 100 | 70.9 | 0.799 |
| Sometimes | 23.1 | 31 | 23.5 | 32 | 22.7 | |
| Regularly (everyday) | 5.5 | 6 | 4.5 | 9 | 6.4 | |
| Coffee | ||||||
| No | 63.4 | 76 | 57.6 | 97 | 68.8 | 0.136 |
| Sometimes | 20.5 | 30 | 22.7 | 26 | 18.4 | |
| Regularly (everyday) | 16.1 | 26 | 19.7 | 18 | 12.8 | |
| Carbonated soft drinks | ||||||
| No | 76.6 | 110 | 83.3 | 99 | 70.2 |
|
| Yes | 23.4 | 22 | 16.7 | 42 | 29.8 | |
| Physical activity | ||||||
| No | 40.7 | 55 | 41.7 | 56 | 39.7 | 0.898 |
| Sometimes | 22.3 | 30 | 22.7 | 31 | 22.0 | |
| Regularly (at least 30 min a day, 3 days a week) | 37.0 | 47 | 35.6 | 54 | 38.3 | |
* Chi‐square test
There was no statistically significant difference between the IG and NIG on stress, smoking, drinking, coffee, physical activity. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of carbonated drinks between the IG and NIG.
Comparison of initial quality of life characteristics between intervention group (IG) and nonintervention group (NIG) cohorts
| Characteristics | Group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| IG ( | NIG ( | ||
| Original quality‐of‐life score | |||
| Total score | 66.8 ± 15.4 | 70.0 ± 11.7 | 0.100 |
| Dysphoria score | 59.9 ± 17.0 | 62.5 ± 12.3 | 0.237 |
| Interference with activity score | 59.4 ± 23.0 | 63.9 ± 16.3 | 0.116 |
| Body image score | 80.3 ± 18.8 | 84.4 ± 12.4 | 0.228 |
| Health worry score | 58.5 ± 22.1 | 62.4 ± 15.9 | 0.108 |
| Food avoidance score | 54.6 ± 27.4 | 55.3 ± 24.7 | 0.477 |
| Social reaction score | 78.0 ± 22.4 | 78.6 ± 18.9 | 0.596 |
| Sexual score | 80.6 ± 26.1 | 87.7 ± 18.9 | 0.387 |
| Relationship score | 80.5 ± 21.5 | 83.9 ± 17.2 | 0.501 |
* Mann‐Whitney test
Δ score = score after 2 months – baseline score.
There has not statistically significant difference for the two groups on aspects of both groups at the baseline (P > 0.05).
Quality of life score after 2 months of follow‐up
| Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of life score after 2 months of follow‐up | IG ( | NIG ( |
|
| Total score | 85.4 ± 8.8 | 82.7 ± 8.3 |
|
| Dysphoria score | 87.8 ± 13.4 | 87.9 ± 6.9 | 0.127 |
| Interference with activity score | 79.2 ± 14.1 | 79.7 ± 11.8 | 0.982 |
| Body image score | 91.3 ± 10.4 | 91.0 ± 10.1 | 0.551 |
| Health worry score | 88.5 ± 15.4 | 76.6 ± 14.1 |
|
| Food avoidance score | 63.5 ± 23.1 | 63.9 ± 19.4 | 0.988 |
| Social reaction score | 91.9 ± 13.2 | 83.7 ± 13.7 |
|
| Sexual score | 87.1 ± 20.2 | 88.6 ± 16.0 | 0.669 |
| Relationship score | 94.7 ± 10.6 | 84.9 ± 13.2 |
|
| Δ Total score | 20.1 ± 12.1 | 13.2 ± 13.4 |
|
| Δ Dysphoria score | 29.4 ± 17.4 | 24.9 ± 14.4 |
|
| Δ Interference with activity score | 21.8 ± 18.3 | 15.9 ± 18.6 |
|
| Δ Body image score | 12.9 ± 14.2 | 7.5 ± 15.2 |
|
| Δ Health worry score | 32.1 ± 23.2 | 14.6 ± 19.5 |
|
| Δ Food avoidance score | 9.3 ± 24.5 | 10.2 ± 29.0 | 0.861 |
| Δ Social reaction score | 14.6 ± 19.1 | 5.8 ± 23.0 |
|
| Δ Sexual score | 7.9 ± 16.5 | 2.3 ± 25.1 | 0.092 |
| Δ Relationship score | 15.2 ± 17.9 | 2.0 ± 21.5 |
|
* Mann‐Whitney test
After 2 months of intervention, the score of quality of life and its on health anxiety aspects, social response, and relationship significantly higher than the NIG group (p < 0.001). At the same time, the change in overall the score of quality of life and unpleasant aspects, obstructing activities, body shape, health anxiety, social reactions, relationships in the IG group is also significantly higher than that in NIG group. Statistical significance (P < 0.05)
∆ score = score after 2 months – baseline score.
Degree of impact caused by pharmacist intervention and interference factors on changes of quality of life (QoL) score after 2 months of follow‐up
| Factor (independent variables) | Changes (∆) in QoL score (dependent variable) | Slope |
| CI (95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG | Δ Total score | 5.9 |
| 2.4–9.4 |
| Δ Dysphoria score | 2.5 | 0.259 | (−1.8)–6.7 | |
| Δ Interference with activity score | 4.4 | 0.081 | (−0.5)–9.4 | |
| Δ Body image score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Health worry score | 16.4 |
| 10.7–22.1 | |
| Δ Food avoidance score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Social reaction score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Sexual score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Relationship score | 13.3 |
| 7.8–18.8 | |
| Job | Δ Total score | 0.3 | 0.488 | (−0.6)–1.3 |
| Δ Dysphoria score | 0.1 | 0.816 | (−1.1)–1.4 | |
| Δ Interference with activity score | 0.2 | 0.781 | −1.2–1.6 | |
| Δ Body image score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Health worry score | −0.4 | 0.638 | −2.0 to 1.2 | |
| Δ Food avoidance score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Social reaction score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Sexual score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Relationship score | −0.4 | 0.602 | (−2.0)–1.1 | |
| Carbonated soft drinks | Δ Total score | −4.2 | 0.053 | (−8.5)–0.1 |
| Δ Dysphoria score | −8.8 |
| (−14.1)–3.5 | |
| Δ Interference with activity score | −3.8 | 0.221 | (−10.0)—2.3 | |
| Δ Body image score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Health worry score | −8.4 |
| (−15.5)–(−1.4) | |
| Δ Food avoidance score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Social reaction score | — | — | — | |
| Δ Sexual score | — | — | – | |
| Δ Relationship score | 2.0 | 0.566 | (−4.8)–8.8 |
* Multivariate linear regression
The IG group had Δ a total quality of life higher than 5.9 units (P = 0.001); Δ Health worry score is higher than 16.4 units (P < 0.001); Δ the relationship score is 13.3 score higher (P < 0.001) compared to the NIG group.