Literature DB >> 33553206

Development and Validation of a Sepsis Mortality Risk Score for Sepsis-3 Patients in Intensive Care Unit.

Kai Zhang1, Shufang Zhang2, Wei Cui1, Yucai Hong3, Gensheng Zhang1, Zhongheng Zhang3.   

Abstract

Background: Many severity scores are widely used for clinical outcome prediction for critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, for patients identified by sepsis-3 criteria, none of these have been developed. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk stratification score for mortality prediction in sepsis-3 patients.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we employed the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC III) database for model development and the eICU database for external validation. We identified septic patients by sepsis-3 criteria on day 1 of ICU entry. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) technique was performed to select predictive variables. We also developed a sepsis mortality prediction model and associated risk stratification score. We then compared model discrimination and calibration with other traditional severity scores.
Results: For model development, we enrolled a total of 5,443 patients fulfilling the sepsis-3 criteria. The 30-day mortality was 16.7%. With 5,658 septic patients in the validation set, there were 1,135 deaths (mortality 20.1%). The score had good discrimination in development and validation sets (area under curve: 0.789 and 0.765). In the validation set, the calibration slope was 0.862, and the Brier value was 0.140. In the development dataset, the score divided patients according to mortality risk of low (3.2%), moderate (12.4%), high (30.7%), and very high (68.1%). The corresponding mortality in the validation dataset was 2.8, 10.5, 21.1, and 51.2%. As shown by the decision curve analysis, the score always had a positive net benefit.
Conclusion: We observed moderate discrimination and calibration for the score termed Sepsis Mortality Risk Score (SMRS), allowing stratification of patients according to mortality risk. However, we still require further modification and external validation.
Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Zhang, Cui, Hong, Zhang and Zhang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical care; intensive care unit (ICU); machine learning; mortality prediction model; sepsis-3.0; severity score system

Year:  2021        PMID: 33553206      PMCID: PMC7859108          DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.609769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)        ISSN: 2296-858X


  38 in total

1.  Selection of important variables and determination of functional form for continuous predictors in multivariable model building.

Authors:  Willi Sauerbrei; Patrick Royston; Harald Binder
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Opening the black box of neural networks: methods for interpreting neural network models in clinical applications.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Marcus W Beck; David A Winkler; Bin Huang; Wilbert Sibanda; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

3.  Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Foster Gesten; Hallie C Prescott; Marcus E Friedrich; Theodore J Iwashyna; Gary S Phillips; Stanley Lemeshow; Tiffany Osborn; Kathleen M Terry; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Qi Huang; Chang-Hong Liang; Lan He; Jie Tian; Cui-Shan Liang; Xin Chen; Ze-Lan Ma; Zai-Yi Liu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A Severe Sepsis Mortality Prediction Model and Score for Use With Administrative Data.

Authors:  Dee W Ford; Andrew J Goodwin; Annie N Simpson; Emily Johnson; Nandita Nadig; Kit N Simpson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  The association between lactate, mean arterial pressure, central venous oxygen saturation and peripheral temperature and mortality in severe sepsis: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Aletta P I Houwink; Saskia Rijkenberg; Rob J Bosman; Peter H J van der Voort
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Prognostic accuracy of the serum lactate level, the SOFA score and the qSOFA score for mortality among adults with Sepsis.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Liu; Zibo Meng; Yongfeng Li; Jingyuan Zhao; Shihong Wu; Shanmiao Gou; Heshui Wu
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Clinical Trajectories and Causes of Death in Septic Patients with a Low APACHE II Score.

Authors:  Chun-Ta Huang; Sheng-Yuan Ruan; Yi-Ju Tsai; Shih-Chi Ku; Chong-Jen Yu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  3 in total

1.  Machine Learning for Prediction of Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Fangning Rong; Huaqiang Xiang; Lu Qian; Yangjing Xue; Kangting Ji; Ripen Yin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Elevated Arterial Stiffness in Chinese Patients With Diabetes Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Qingqing Li; Wenhui Xie; Liping Li; Lijing Wang; Qinyi You; Lu Chen; Jing Li; Yilang Ke; Jun Fang; Libin Liu; Huashan Hong
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Comparison of Two Predictive Models of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients Based on the Combined Use of Inflammatory Markers.

Authors:  Xiaoming Li; Chao Liu; Xiaoli Wang; Zhi Mao; Hongyu Yi; Feihu Zhou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.